Litoporus aerius Simon, 1893
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.718.1101 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F9E9A91E-488C-4DB1-9361-E788E9AC5BC1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14371426 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E887AD-FF90-7A43-FDEC-FB83F8AEF852 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Litoporus aerius Simon, 1893 |
status |
|
Litoporus aerius Simon, 1893 View in CoL
Figs 200–202 View Figs 200–207 , 208–209 View Figs 208–211 , 1041
Litoporus aerius Simon, 1893a: 321 View in CoL .
Litoporus aerius View in CoL – Simon 1893b: 479–483, fig. 479. — Huber 1997d: 582, figs 8a–b, 9a–e (not figs 8c–d; see Notes below). — González-Sponga 2010: 15, pl. 3, figs 1–8.
Diagnosis
Males are easily distinguished from most known congeners (except L. curimagua Huber sp. nov.) by armature of chelicerae ( Fig. 208 View Figs 208–211 ; two pairs of frontal apophyses, proximal pair short but wide). Females (newly described below) with distinctive internal genital structures ( Figs 201–202 View Figs 200–207 , 209 View Figs 208–211 ; anterior receptacle, heavily sclerotized ventral structure, and pair of processes originating from pore plates); note, however, that females of several putatively closely related species are unknown ( L. dimona Huber, 2000 ; L. saul Huber, 2000 ; L. secoya Huber, 2000 ). Distinguished from very similar L. curimagua Huber sp. nov. by proximal cheliceral apophyses inclined rather than horizontal (compare Figs 208 and 210 View Figs 208–211 ), by anterior margins of pore plates strongly bent towards posterior (arrows in Figs 201 and 206 View Figs 200–207 ), and by pair of processes originating from pore plates (compare Figs 209 and 211 View Figs 208–211 ).
Type material
VENEZUELA – Carabobo • ♂ lectotype (designated in Huber 1997d), 11 ♂♂ paralectotypes, and one misidentified female paralectotype (see Notes below), MNHN, San Esteban [approximately 10.425° N, 68.015° W], Mar. 1888 (E. Simon); examined GoogleMaps .
Notes
The new material below confirms the old suspicion (in Huber 1997d) that the single female accompanying the male types of this species is not conspecific with the males. It is very likely a Mecolaesthus Simon, 1893 .
González-Sponga (2010) redescribed the species and cited material from seven localities. This material seems to be present in the MAGS collection, but there are two major problems regarding the material and the publication. First, the collection cards (that contain all the collection data) of all seven vials are lost. Within the vials there are only labels with the MAGS numbers (334, 502, 1037, 1040, 1043, 1051, 1092). Second, the publication mentions only vial MAGS 502 with 9 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀, but this vial contains only 2 ♂♂, and all seven vials together contain 24 ♂♂, and 3 juveniles and not a single female. González-Sponga’s (2010) figure 8 (abdomen) is thus probably from a juvenile, and it is probably for this reason that his figure 9 (epigynum) exists in the legend but not in the plate.
The numerical agreement between seven localities mentioned in González-Sponga (2010) and seven vials with L. aerius in the MAGS collection suggests that all his records are probably valid. They
are thus all shown in the map in Fig. 1041. Apart from the type locality San Esteban this includes the following:
Miranda, Birongo [10.482° N, 66.240° W]
Miranda, El Guapo-Las Mayas [10.149° N, 65.972° W]
Miranda, Guatopo National Park [approximately 10.06° N, 66.46° W]
Miranda, Pueblo Seco-Chuspa [approximately 10.59° N, 66.26° W]
Miranda, Salmerón [approximately 10.468° N, 66.376° W]
Anzoátegui, Sabana de Uchire [approximately 10.02° N, 65.52° W]
New records
VENEZUELA – Miranda • 3 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀, ZFMK (Ar 21864), and 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK (Ven18-144), El Ávila National Park , Sabas Nieves (10.5165° N, 66.8558° W), 1080 m a.s.l., 7 Nov. 2018 (B.A. Huber, O. Villarreal M.) GoogleMaps • 1 ♂, ZFMK (Ar 21865), and 3 ♀♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK (Ven20- 180), El Ávila National Park , near La Julia, ‘site 3’ (10.5066° N, 66.8119° W), 1090 m a.s.l., forest near dry brook bed, 22 Feb. 2020 (B.A. Huber, O. Villarreal M.) GoogleMaps .
Redescription of male (amendments, see Huber 1997d)
Measurements (male from El Ávila): distance PME–PME 160 µm; diameter PME 50 µm; distance PMEALE 40 µm; distanceAME–AME 40 µm; diameter AME 30 µm. Leg 1: 38.1 (10.7+0.4 +8.9+16.4 + 1.7), tibia 2: 6.3, tibia 3: 4.5, tibia 4: 5.9; tibia 1 L/d: 99. Carapace monochromous whitish to pale ochre; legs light brown, femora and tibiae with whitish tips, metatarsi entire distal half whitish. Thoracic furrow shallow but distinct. Retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 1.5%; prolateral trichobothrium present on tibia 1. Tibia 1 in 11 males (Sabas Nieves and types measured in Huber 1997d): 8.5–9.9 (mean 9.2); tibia 1 in male from near La Julia: 6.7.
Description of female
In general similar to male (and very similar to L. curimagua Huber sp. nov.; cf. Fig. 204 View Figs 200–207 ), but carapace with dark Y-mark, and legs pale ochre yellow with darker patellae and tibia-metatarsus joints, without whitish tips. Tibia 1 in three females from Sabas Nieves: 4.2, 4.3, 4.4; two females from near La Julia: 3.5, 3.5. Epigynum ( Fig. 200 View Figs 200–207 ) weakly sclerotized, posteriorly rectangular plate, internal structures partly visible in uncleared specimens. Internal genitalia ( Figs 201–202 View Figs 200–207 , 209 View Figs 208–211 ) with anterior median receptacle, heavily sclerotized ventral structure, and pair of processes originating from pore plates.
Distribution
Known from several localities in the Venezuelan states Carabobo, Miranda, and Anzoátegui (Fig. 1041).
Natural history
The newly collected specimens were found in domed webs among low vegetation (10–40 cm above the ground). The specimens from Sabas Nieves were found in a humid part of the forest close to a small stream; near La Julia the species was found close to a dry brook bed. The long-legged males were constantly slightly swinging in the webs while the females were not seen to move but were hiding on the undersides of leaves. It is probably for this reason that the collections of E. Simon and M.A. GonzálezSponga include numerous males but no females.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Litoporus aerius Simon, 1893
Huber, Bernhard A. & Villarreal, Osvaldo 2020 |
Litoporus aerius
Simon E. 1893: 321 |
Litoporus aerius
Gonzalez-Sponga M. A. 2010: 15 |
Huber B. A. 1997: 582 |
Simon E. 1893: 479 |