Testechiniscus meridionalis ( Murray, 1906 )

Gąsiorek, Piotr, Stec, Daniel, Zawierucha, Krzysztof, Kristensen, Reinhardt Møbjerg & Michalczyk, Łukasz, 2018, Revision of Testechiniscus Kristensen, 1987 (Heterotardigrada: Echiniscidae) refutes the polar-temperate distribution of the genus, Zootaxa 4472 (2), pp. 261-297 : 285

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4472.2.3

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1468154D-628C-456B-A237-5E130AB3E9FF

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5975778

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EA879F-B946-8805-FF73-934ABFFB194B

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Testechiniscus meridionalis ( Murray, 1906 )
status

 

Autapomorphies of Testechiniscus meridionalis ( Murray, 1906) View in CoL and T. macronyx ( Richters, 1907)

(measurements and statistics of juveniles and adult specimens of both sexes of T. meridionalis in Tables 10–12)

Both species assigned to the genus Testechiniscus by Kristensen (1987) and McInnes (1994a), respectively, exhibit unique phenotypic traits. Given that works on their systematic position are in progress (McInnes, personal communication), we do not designate them as new genera, but, instead, we present their autapomorphies, which exclude their affiliation within the revised Testechiniscus . Both species have brown lipoid or red eyes and are dioecious whereas Testechiniscus s.s. exhibits black crystalline eyes and parthenogenetic reproduction (although the presence of males was suggested in T. laterculus by Kathman & Dastych (1990)).

Moreover, T. meridionalis resembles Testechiniscus s.s. in having eight rows of ventral plates, however it differs from Testechiniscus s.s. by: a smaller body size, i.e. with adults not exceeding 200 µm (compare Figs 1A–B View FIGURE 1 , 6A–B View FIGURE 6 , 10A–C View FIGURE 10 and 12A–B View FIGURE 12 , see Tables 10–11), whereas adults of Testechiniscus spp. are typically 300–450 µm long; smaller ventral plates ( Figs 12C–D View FIGURE 12 ) with minute cuticular pillars that are more like in the Bryodelphax weglarskae group (see Dastych 1984, Kaczmarek et al. 2012) rather than in Testechiniscus spp.; the dorsal sculpture consisting solely of granules ( Fig. 14E View FIGURE 14 ) and never polygonal pores typical for Testechiniscus (e.g. Fig. 14A View FIGURE 14 ); evident sexual dimorphism, i.e. cephalic papillae and primary clavae are significantly longer in males than in females (one-tailed Welch t -test for: cephalic papillae: t 3=4.07, p=0.013, and primary clavae: t 3=4.14, p=0.013, compare also Figs 12A, D View FIGURE 12 , arrowheads).

Finally, T. macronyx differs from the revised Testechiniscus by: a smaller body size (i.e. below 200 µm); the presence of only lateral, exceptionally long cirri A ( Fig. 13A View FIGURE 13 ); nine (instead of eight) rows of small ventral plates (configuration IX:2-5-5-2-4-4-4-1-2, Fig. 13B View FIGURE 13 ); dorsal sculpture in the form of an irregular reticulum/pseudopores (see McInnes 1994a), that look like dark margins of minute bright depressions on the cuticle surface ( Fig. 14F View FIGURE 14 ); and by considerably longer claws, curved slightly only in their terminal parts.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF