Antechinus argentus, Baker, Mutton & Hines, 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3746.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:878A20EE-FCFE-43D4-B716-A57A4C752625 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EAD149-FFDF-873D-FF28-4C6DE40B1169 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Antechinus argentus |
status |
|
(8) A. argentus View in CoL versus A. subtropicus Van Dyck and Crowther
Pelage: A. argentus has a silvery head and neck that merges to deep olive-buff on the rump and flanks; A. subtropicus is more uniformly brownish on the head and back.
External measurements: A. argentus is smaller than A. subtropicus in absolute measurement for one external body character in females: wt (see Table 4); this was rendered non-significant because of small sample size in female A. argentus and A. subtropicus (n=2 and n=3 for body weight, respectively) (Table 4).
Dentary: Antechinus argentus is smaller than A. subtropicus in absolute measurement in males and females for: APV, IOW and PPV. Antechinus argentus is larger than A. subtropicus in absolute measurement in males and females for: IPV. Antechinus argentus is smaller than A. subtropicus in absolute measurement in females only for: Dent, HT and PL (Table 4). A. argentus has small- to medium-sized entoconids on M 3, whereas in A. subtropicus they are medium- to large-sized.
Other Comments: A. argentus is found in south-east Qld in Kroombit Tops NP, whereas A. subtropicus has a coastal subtropical distribution in south-east Qld and north-east NSW, with a northern limit at about Gympie (about 200 km SSE of Kroombit). Genetics: uncorrected pairwise range differences at the mitochondrial gene CytB between A. argentus and A. subtropicus are 14.3–14.7%.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.