Cotesia erionotae (Wilkinson, 1928)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.667 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:59113117-7A31-4969-BA24-4E8E45EBF24A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5700536 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EE8792-C40F-3824-D04C-FC4B864D2D95 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Cotesia erionotae (Wilkinson, 1928) |
status |
|
Cotesia erionotae (Wilkinson, 1928) View in CoL
Fig. 16A View Fig
Apanteles erionotae Wilkinson, 1928: 83 (holotype, ♀, NHMUK).
Cotesia erionotae View in CoL – Austin & Dangerfield 1992: 21 (transfer from Apanteles View in CoL s.l.).
Diagnosis
Cotesia erionotae can be separated from all other species of Cotesia currently described from Australia and Papua New Guinea by the following combination of characters: T3 pale; T1–2 mostly pale; antennae pale.
Material examined
Holotype
MALAYSIA • 1 ♀; Parit Buntar; Mar. 1922; G.H. Corbett leg.; parasite from Erionota thrax (Linnaeus, 1767) ; “233”; NHMUK 3.c.1037.
Distribution
Malaysia (from type specimens); Papua New Guinea (introduced, see Waterhouse et al. 1998); Thailand, Mauritius (introduced), Guam (introduced), Hawaii (introduced), Saipan (introduced) (Waterhouse & Norris 1989).
Host
Erionota thrax (Hesperiidae) (record from type material), gregarious ( Okolle et al. 2006).
Remarks
We include this species in the key due to its presence in Papua New Guinea, but it is not known to occur in Australia.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cotesia erionotae (Wilkinson, 1928)
Fagan-Jeffries, Erinn P. & Austin, Andrew D. 2020 |
Cotesia erionotae
Austin A. D. & Dangerfield P. C. 1992: 21 |
Apanteles erionotae
Apanteles erionotae Wilkinson, 1928: 83 |