Chloropepla tucuruiensis Grazia & Teradaira, 1980
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1163/1876312X-04401002 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3665137 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EFB13F-FF8D-FFA1-FFCB-FF156B67FD69 |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana |
scientific name |
Chloropepla tucuruiensis Grazia & Teradaira, 1980 |
status |
|
Chloropepla tucuruiensis Grazia & Teradaira, 1980
Chloropepla tucuruiensis Grazia & Teradaira, 1980: 123–130 ; Grazia et al. 2008b: 535
Diagnosis
Medium size (male: 12.93; female: 13.66). Humeral angles triangular. Male. Pygophore triangular, a bit longer than wide. Dorsal projection of hypandrium widening from base toward apex; ventral wall with apical bilobed process and 1 +1 medial triangular processes. Paramere narrowing from base toward apex. Processus phallothecae 2 earlike; processus phallothecae 1 absent ( Grazia & Teradaira 1980). Female. Gonocoxites 8 posterior margintriangular; posterior thirdof suturalmargins divergent.Laterotergites 9 slightly shorter than laterotergites 8 both with acute apex. Basal half of pars intermedialis striated. The three processes of capsula seminalis reaching the posterior annular flange ( Grazia & Teradaira 1980).
Distribution
Brazil (PA, MT).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chloropepla tucuruiensis Grazia & Teradaira, 1980
Grevea, Caroline, Schwertnerb, Cristiano F. & Grazia, Jocelia 2013 |
Chloropepla tucuruiensis
Grazia, J. & Schwertner, C. F. & Greve, C. 2008: 535 |
Grazia, J. & Teradaira, C. T. 1980: 123-130 |