Cryptalaus cardoni ( Candèze, 1890 ) Parekar & Danani & Patwardhan, 2024

Parekar, Harshad, Danani, Drashti & Patwardhan, Amol, 2024, Rediscovery and Redescription of Cryptalaus cardoni (Candèze, 1890) comb. nov (Coleoptera: Elateridae) after a century with notes on other Cryptalaus Ôhira species in India, Zootaxa 5399 (1), pp. 52-64 : 53-56

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5399.1.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2CCD1E2F-977D-4250-B6DE-E6F903B3517A

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10494554

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F387F3-FF93-CB2F-7880-FBFD121D4B35

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Cryptalaus cardoni ( Candèze, 1890 )
status

comb. nov.

Cryptalaus cardoni ( Candèze, 1890) comb. nov.

( Figures 1–3 View FIGURES 1–4 , 5–14 View FIGURES 5–14 , 22–27 View FIGURES 22–33 )

Alaus cardoni Candèze, 1890 : CL (original description; type locality: Bengal); Candèze, 1891: 32 (catalogue; distribution: “ Bengalen ”); Schwarz, 1906: 37 (catalogue; distribution: “ Bengalen ”); Schenkling, 1925: 46 (catalogue; distribution: “ Bengalen ”).

Type material (examined through photographs). 1 Syntype ( Figs 1, 2 View FIGURES 1–4 ), sex unknown, INDIA: Bengal , precise location unknown; see remarks ( RBINS) .

New material examined. 1 male ( TN275 ), INDIA: Thakurpada , SGNP , Mumbai , Maharashtra, 17.vi.2023, on light, coll. A. Patwardhan ( ZKJSSC) .

Distribution. INDIA: Jharkhand (see remarks), Maharashtra (new state record).

Redescription.

Male (TN275). Body elongate and subparallel ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5–14 ) 11 mm long, 3 mm wide, pitch-black, with antennomeres I–II brownish black, and maxillary palpi brownish with tip slightly whitish, labial palpi whitish with last segment light brownish and tip whitish, and legs including coxa reddish brown with femora, tarsi darker; dorsum densely covered with whitish grey decumbent scale-like setae intermingled with black blotches and brownish speckles; pronotum with anterior and posterior sides including posterior angles covered with whitish grey scales with disc of pronotum covered with brownish to black scales with a few whitish speckles; scutellar shield and adjacent area of elytra around scutellar shield with black scales except posterior edge of scutellar shield with white-grey scales; elytral interstria I with alternate black and white bands from medial half to subapical end, interstria II with small vertical to slightly oblique black band near anterior submedial part, elytral medial region with two black blotches covering interstriae III to X, small obscured patch of white scales encapsulated in black scales near elytral apex; ventrally ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5–14 ) with dense white scales throughout.

Head. Short ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 5–14 ), almost as wide as long (length/width 0.92), including eyes 0.68 times as wide as pronotum; frons ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 5–14 ) carinate over antennal insertion, with shallow depression subapically; punctures dense, round, deep, separated by less than half of their diameter with interspaces between them somewhat flat. Labrum around 3.0 times as wide as long, densely punctate, covered with yellow, long setae. Maxillary and labial palpi with apical palpomere securiform. Antennae ( Figs 5, 12 View FIGURES 5–14 ) short, slightly reaching beyond half of pronotal length in dorsal view, serrate from antennomere IV. Length ratio of antennomeres II–IV is about 1.0: 1.3: 1.9. Antennomere II almost as wide as long; antennomere III about 1.1 times as long as wide; antennomere IV about 1.1 times as long as wide; antennomere XI slightly longer than antennomere IV, twice as long as wide.

Thorax. Pronotum ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 5–14 ) 1.28 times longer than wide (measured medially), and 1.40 times longer than wide including posterior angles. Anterior edge ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 5–14 ) uniformly shallowly arched, smooth, without any projections; anterior angles somewhat acute, very slightly produced anteriad; sides straight and subparallel, gradually sloping in anterior 1/4, and just slightly incurved before posterior angles; posterior angles long, broadly pointed, very slightly divergent, with carinae not reaching base. Disc of pronotum uniformly convex without any ridge or carina. Punctures dense, round, deep, separated by less than half to half their diameter with interspaces between them flat. Hypomeron ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 5–14 ) with anterior angles slightly acutely produced beyond prosternal chin piece; mesal edge near opening for antenna sinuous; posterior edge with sharply produced angle near middle; punctures dense, similar to those on pronotum, separated by about half of their diameter, interspaces flat with minute dot-like punctures. Prosternum ( Figs 7, 10 View FIGURES 5–14 ) in front of procoxae about 6.3 times long, 7.4 times wide at base of chin piece, 2.6 times wide before procoxae (all measurements compared with diameter of procoxa); chin piece transverse, around 4.0 times wider than long with anterior edge almost straight with angular ends, around 40 degrees below prosternal plane in lateral view ( Figs 6, 14 View FIGURES 5–14 ); shallow transverse impression posteriad to base of chin piece; surface strongly convex in ventral view; punctures denser near chin piece, lateral edges and less denser medially, slightly larger than those on hypomeron, each puncture on average separated by about less than half to half its diameter near chin piece and about 1.0–2.0 times its diameter medially, interspaces between larger punctures with small dot-like punctures more or less uniformly distributed. Prosternal process ( Figs 7, 10, 14 View FIGURES 5–14 ) about 3.30 times longer than diameter of procoxa, almost horizontal behind procoxae till basal half then gradually slightly curved to posterior half (visible in lateral view). Scutellar shield ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 5–14 ) somewhat lingulate, almost twice as long as wide, uniformly declivous; anterior edge deeply emarginate in middle; sides slightly incurved till anterior half then widened in middle and sloping in arched posterior edge; punctation starts in posterior half with punctures similar to those on head and pronotum but sparser with scale-like pubescence. Mesoventrite ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 5–14 ) 1.30 times wider than long; mesoventral cavity with sides parallel. Metaventrite ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 5–14 ) 1.36 times wider than long; metaventral discrimen ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 5–14 ) not reaching anterior edge of metaventrite, deeply furrowed in about its posterior one-third, almost reaching posterior edge. Metacoxal plate about 6.0 times as wide as narrowest part, anterior edge oblique, posterior edge after lobe subparallel to anterior edge. Elytra ( Figs 5, 8 View FIGURES 5–14 ) 1.9 times as long as pronotum, 2.5 times as long as its combined width, together almost as wide as pronotum; sides sub-parallel to posterior two-third, then slightly narrowing to apex; apex of elytra dehiscent, conjointly rounded apically with slightly produced knob-like sutural spine; striae III costate near base, interstriae flat.

Abdomen. Ventrite V ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 5–14 ) anteriorly (measured near anterior edge) twice as wide as long. Tergite VIII ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–33 ) widely v-shaped with convex posterior edge, about 1.82 times as wide as long, anterior edge inwardly obtusely angulate; medially with sparse punctures without longer setae, apically and apicolaterally densely punctate with bristle-like long setae. Sternite VIII ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 22–33 ) somewhat semicircular, about 1.5 times as wide as long, moderately covered with short setae along darker posterior edge; translucent median area heart-shaped without apparent punctures. Tergites IX–X ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 22–33 ) connected with membrane; tergite IX 2.6 times as wide as long, anterior margin somewhat bisinuous, sides arcuate posteriad, posterior edge incurved uniformly, punctate throughout in posterior two-third with a few setae apicolaterally; tergite X small, slightly semicircular posteriorly. Sternite IX ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 22–33 ) almost twice as long as wide, posteriorly rounded and translucent with short setae, sides smoothly constricted medially, anterior arch emarginated and obliterated medially. Aedeagus ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 22–33 ) 2.6 times as long as wide; median lobe longer than parameres, broader at base, gradually narrowing anteriorly to somewhat widely rounded apex; basal struts moderately long, robust, inclined inwardly, about 0.32 times as long as aedeagus and 0.54 times as long as median lobe, uniformly thick throughout, apically rounded. Paramere ( Figs 26, 27 View FIGURES 22–33 ) slightly constricted behind subapical hook, sides somewhat subparallel, inner margin behind subapical hook slightly sinuate; covered in long setae near and behind subapical hook on dorsal and ventral sides; apical lobe of paramere somewhat elliptical, about 2.6 times as long as wide (width measured along subapical hook) with narrowly rounded apex, outer margin arcuate towards subapical hook, inner margin straight and sloping outwardly just slightly; subapical hook pressed inwardly, short, inconspicuously sharp.

Remarks. All the morphological characters and genitalia structures confirm its transfer to genus Cryptalaus and hence, we propose Cryptalaus cardoni ( Candèze, 1890) comb. nov. Interestingly, the male specimen (TN275) we have at our disposal has its right antenna with antennomeres IV and V conjoined ( Figs 3 View FIGURES 1–4 , 5, 12 View FIGURES 5–14 ). This deformity gives an impression of an elbowed antenna. RBINS has only a single specimen with Candèze’s original type labels (pers. comm. Jérôme Constant, RBINS; see Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–4 ). There is no specimen with a type label in the Natural History Museum, London, The United Kingdom (NHML; list shared by Max Barclay & Michael Geiser). Furthermore, Candèze did not give the number of additional specimens he examined, as seen in the case of other species in the same publication. So, the type specimen in RBINS is treated as a syntype ( ICZN 1999, recommendation 73F, Art. 73.2 and 73.2.1). Its sex is unknown as it lacks the abdomen (pers. comm. Jérôme Constant, RBINS). Although the type label reads “Bengal”, Candèze mentioned (1890: CXLVII) that Father Cardon primarily collected most of the elaterid specimens used in his publication from the vicinity of Tetra as “Tetara” and “Konbir-Nowatoli” which were a part of Bengal in the 19th century. These localities belong in Jharkhand. Hence, this locality is added as a part of its distribution.

RBINS

RBINS

SGNP

SGNP

RBINS

Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Elateridae

Genus

Cryptalaus

Loc

Cryptalaus cardoni ( Candèze, 1890 )

Parekar, Harshad, Danani, Drashti & Patwardhan, Amol 2024
2024
Loc

Alaus cardoni Candèze, 1890

Schenkling, S. 1925: 46
Schwarz, O. 1906: 37
Candeze, E. C. A. 1891: 32
1891
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF