Reuteroscopus falcatus Van Duzee, 1917b: 278
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090(2001)266<0001:RONWPF>2.0.CO;2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5466225 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F387FC-FF2A-FF2E-2FC6-FBF2F80CFE87 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Reuteroscopus falcatus Van Duzee, 1917b: 278 |
status |
|
Reuteroscopus falcatus Van Duzee, 1917b: 278
(n. sp.).
Microphylellus adustus Knight, 1929a: 40 View in CoL (n. sp.).
NEW SYNONYMY.
Microphylellus adustus binotatus Knight, 1929a :
40 (n. sp.). NEW SYNONYMY.
HOLOTYPE: Microphylellus adustus Knight : Female: ‘‘ Fort Garland, Colo [rado]., Ute Creek Ranch , August 11, 1925, H. H. Knight’ ’. Deposited in the National Museum of Natural History , Washington, D.C.
HOLOTYPE: Microphylellus adustus binotatus Knight : male: ‘‘ Montesano, Wn. [Washington], 29 June 1927, Wm. W. Baker’ ’. Deposited in the National Museum of Natural History , Washington, D.C.
This species has been recorded from California, Washington, and Colorado. The structure of the male genitalia indicates that it belongs to neither Plagiognathus nor Reuteroscopus . The vesica, although similar in general form to that of Plagiognathus , has only a single, rather short, apical spine. Although I have not examined the holotype of falcatus , comparison of the holotypes of Microphylellus adustus and M. a. binotatus in the United States National Museum of Natural History with authoritatively identified specimens of falcatus indicates that these three nominal taxa are the same, with falcatus having priority.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Reuteroscopus falcatus Van Duzee, 1917b: 278
SCHUH, RANDALL T. 2001 |
Microphylellus adustus
Knight 1929: 40 |