Tetragonopterus franciscoensis , Silva, Gabriel S. C., Melo, Bruno F., Oliveira, Claudio & Benine, Ricardo C., 2016

Silva, Gabriel S. C., Melo, Bruno F., Oliveira, Claudio & Benine, Ricardo C., 2016, Revision of the South American genus Tetragonopterus Cuvier, 1816 (Teleostei: Characidae) with description of four new species, Zootaxa 4200 (1), pp. 1-46: 32-35

publication ID

http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4200.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:911ECACD-8903-405E-AAA4-8300901D69C7

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F47776-FFD6-5972-FF5C-BD8F35A24164

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Tetragonopterus franciscoensis
status

new species

Tetragonopterus franciscoensis  , new species

Fig. 12View FIGURE 12, Table 6

Tetragonopterus chalceus  (not Cuvier): Britski et al., 1988: 20, 44–45, 96 (list of species, Três Marias, São Francisco). Tetragonopterus aff. chalceus, Silva et al., 2013: 1613  –1631 ( DNAAbout DNA barcoding).

Tetragonopterus  sp. São Francisco: Melo et al., 2016: 709 –717 (molecular phylogeny).

Holotype. MZUSPAbout MZUSP 120566, 76.5 mm SL, Brazil, Minas Gerais, Três Marias, Rio São Francisco , 18°30’S 45°17’W, H. Britski & I. A. DiasGoogleMaps  , 14–18 Feb 1965.

Paratypes. All from Brazil  . MZUSPAbout MZUSP 17081, 8, 67.9–86.0 mm SL, collected with holotype. LBP 10294View Materials, 21, 70.7–91.3 mm SL, Minas Gerais, São Roque de Minas, Rio São Francisco , 20°11’03.4”S 45°50’57.9”W, J. Senhorini et al., 14 Apr 2010GoogleMaps  . LBP 10319View Materials, 1, 52.7 mm SL, Minas Gerais, Pirapora, Rio São Francisco , 17°13’33.7”S 44°48’27.9”W, J. Senhorini et al., 12 Sep 2010GoogleMaps  . LBP 10350View Materials, 13, 52.1–64.1 mm SL, Minas Gerais, Pirapora, Rio São Francisco , 17°19’29.9”S 44°45’57.2”W, J. Senhorini et al., 14 Jul 2010GoogleMaps  . LBP 10394View Materials, 13, 58.5–80.4 mm SL, Minas Gerais, Buritizeiro, Rio São Francisco , 17°19’32.4”S 44°46’01.0”W, J. Senhorini et al., 15 Jul 2010GoogleMaps  . LBP 11540View Materials, 2, 46.2–47.6 mm SL, Sergipe, Porto da Folha, Rio São Francisco , 10°01’11.1”S 37°07’04.6”W, J. Senhorini et al., 23 Nov 2010GoogleMaps  . LBP 11552View Materials, 2, 45.4–49.2 mm SL, Bahia, Jenipatuba, Rio São Francisco , 9°55’28.4”S 37°07’22.5”W, J. Senhorini et al., 23 Nov 2010GoogleMaps  . LBP 11571View Materials, 1, 30.3 mm SL, Bahia, Jenipatuba, Rio São Francisco , 9°56’03.5”S 37°06’53.8”W, J. Senhorini et al., 24 Nov 2010GoogleMaps  . Non types: MZUSPAbout MZUSP 90886, 5, 42.3–46.4 mm SL, Bahia, Iaçu, Rio Paraguaçu , 12°41’05”S 40°07’05”W, A. Zanata et al., 0 9 May 2006GoogleMaps  . MZUSPAbout MZUSP 90905, 3, 49.3–64.2 mm SL, Bahia, Queimadas, Rio Itapicuru , below Barragem Grande, 10°59’02”S 39°40’09”W, A. Zanata et al., 15 Jun 2005GoogleMaps  .

Diagnosis. Tetragonopterus franciscoensis  is distinguished from all other congeners, except T. anostomus  , by the presence of 11–17 olfactory lamellae (vs. 20–41). Tetragonopterus franciscoensis  also differs from T. anostomus  and T. araguaiensis  by having 11–14 gill rakers on lower limb (vs. 17–20). Tetragonopterus franciscoensis  differs from T. kuluene  and T. anostomus  by having two conspicuous humeral marks (vs. only one conspicuous humeral mark). It differs from T. ommatus  by the presence of 1–4 maxillary teeth (vs. 7–8) and by having a mark centered on the caudal peduncle (vs. mark limited to the posterior portion of the caudal peduncle).

Tetragonopterus franciscoensis  differs from T. rarus  by the absence of dark stripes on the flank (vs. presence of stripes); it differs from T. rarus  and T. georgiae  by having 3.5 scale rows between lateral line and pelvic-fin origin (vs. 4.5–5.5). Tetragonopterus franciscoensis  further differs from T. argenteus  by the presence of 7–9 predorsal scales (vs. 11–17). Tetragonopterus franciscoensis  differs from T. denticulatus  by having humeral marks separated by only one vertical scale row (vs. humeral marks separated by three vertical scale rows). Finally, T. franciscoensis  differs from T. chalceus  by having thinner and sharper principal teeth on dentary (vs. more robust teeth).

Description. Morphometric data summarized in Table 6. Body compressed and moderately elongate when compared with congeners. Greatest depth at origin of dorsal fin. Dorsal profile slightly convex between tip of snout and vertical through middle of orbit; slightly concave from this point to end of occipital process and then convex to dorsal-fin origin; slightly convex from end of dorsal-fin base to rear of adipose fin. Prepelvic region transversely flattened with distinct, longitudinally aligned lateral keels. Ventral profile slightly convex from lower lip to slightly behind vertical through pectoral-fin origin; convex from that point to anal-fin origin; slightly convex along base of anal fin. Caudal peduncle with dorsal and ventral profiles nearly straight.

Holotype Range Mean Standard length (mm) 76.5 29.9–92.8 70.5 Percentages of standard length

Greatest depth 48.5 48.5–58.7 53.9 Predorsal length 51.0 49.6–57.1 52.5 Prepectoral length 28.1 27.4–35.2 29.3 Prepelvic length 48.3 46.9–53.4 50.4 Preanal length 65.4 62.3–76.0 68.4 Caudal peduncle depth 11.5 9.46–17.2 11.0 Caudal peduncle length 6.9 4.67–15.0 7.1 Pectoral-fin length 23.5 18.5–28.5 22.6 Pelvic-fin length 17.4 7.76–20.8 16.9 Dorsal-fin length 32.0 27.0–38.7 33.1 Length of dorsal-fin base 16.4 15.0–19.8 16.8 Anal-fin length 13.9 12.8–32.7 14.6 Length of anal-fin base 37.7 33.4–40.1 37.5 Distance from eye to dorsal-fin origin 48.3 41.9–49.9 48.3 Distance from dorsal-fin origin to caudal-fin base 56.3 50.7–57.9 54.8 Head length 27.5 25.6–29.6 27.7 Head depth 23.7 22.3–33.6 25.6 Percentages of head length

Snout length 14 12–19 14.3 Maxillary length 44 41–49 44.3 Horizontal orbital diameter 46 40–49 44.2 Least interorbital width 36 30–38 34.1 Snout shorter than orbital diameter. Mouth terminal. Upper and lower jaws of similar size. Premaxillary teeth in two rows of relatively robust teeth. Outer row with 5 (34)* or 6 (21) teeth with three cusps, central cusp longest. Inner row with 4 (1) or 5 (55)* teeth with three or five cusps, central cusp twice as long as the lateral cusps. Maxilla with 2 (9), 3 (35)* or 4 (15) tricuspid teeth. Dentary with 4 (55)* anteriormost teeth with four or five cusps followed by one (2 c&s) smaller tricuspid tooth and 12 (2 c&s) smaller conical or tricuspid teeth of similar size.

Dorsal fin rays ii,9 (55)*. First unbranched ray shorter than second one. Dorsal-fin origin anterior to middle of body in SL. Distal margin of fin straight with anterior rays longer. Anal-fin rays v,27 (2), v,28 (3), v,29 (16)*, v,30 (15), v,31 (14) or v,32 (4); posterior unbranched rays and anterior branched rays usually slightly longer than following ones. Anal-fin origin at vertical through base of ninth branched dorsal-fin ray. Pelvic-fin rays i,7 (55)*. Pelvic-fin origin anterior to vertical line through dorsal-fin origin; distal margin of pelvic-fin angled, anterior rays longest. Tip of adpressed pelvic fin reaching anal-fin origin. Pectoral-fin rays i,11 (11), i,12 (26)*, or i,13 (17). Caudal fin forked, with i,17,i rays (2 c&s). Dorsal procurrent rays 11 and ventral procurrent rays 7 (2 c&s).

Scales large and cycloid. Lateral line complete and distinctly bent downward anteriorly. Longitudinal scales 29 (1), 30 (27), 31 (23) or 32 (4)*. Scale rows between lateral line and dorsal-fin origin 6 (18) or 7 (37)*; scale rows between lateral line and pelvic-fin origin 3.5 (55)*. Scale rows around caudal peduncle 12 (28), 13 (25)* or 14 (2). Anal-fin base covered by a single row of small scales, lobes of caudal fin scaled. Predorsal scales 7 (2), 8 (43) or 9 (10)*.

First gill arch with 9 (4)*, 10 (9) or 11 (8) rakers on the upper limb and 12 (4), 13 (9)* or 14 (8) rakers on the lower limb. Total vertebrae 30, precaudal vertebrae 12, intermediate vertebrae 2 and caudal vertebrae 16 (2 c&s). Supraneurals 3 (2 c&s).

Color in alcohol. General body color pale brown. Dorsal portions of head and body darkly pigmented. Dorsolateral portion of body scattered with few chromatophores along distal margins of scales; scales of ventrolateral portion of body less pigmented. Opercular and infraorbital bones silvery. Two conspicuous vertical dark humeral marks spaced by one or two scales, with anterior more evident. Anterior humeral mark extending over four horizontal scale rows above lateral line. Posterior humeral mark extending over three horizontal scales rows above lateral line. Caudal peduncle with a rounded or horizontally elongate dark mark. Midlateral silvery stripe broad, running from supracleithrum to anterior margin of the dark mark on caudal peduncle. Anal, pelvic, and dorsal fin hyaline, outlined by small chromatophores at distal portions of rays. Adipose fin hyaline with distal margins covered by small chromatophores ( Fig. 12View FIGURE 12 a).

Sexual dimorphism. None observed.

Distribution. Tetragonopterus franciscoensis  occurs in the Rio São Francisco basin, Rio Paraguaçu and Rio Itapicuru, all coastal drainages of northeastern Brazil ( Fig. 2 a).

Etymology. The specific epithet franciscoensis  is in reference to the Rio São Francisco, where the species is well known and abundant. An adjective. Tetragonopterus franciscoensis  is popularly known as “piaba-rapadura” in the state of Minas Gerais.

DNA

Department of Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport

MZUSP

Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Anthribidae

Genus

Tetragonopterus

Loc

Tetragonopterus franciscoensis

Silva, Gabriel S. C., Melo, Bruno F., Oliveira, Claudio & Benine, Ricardo C. 2016

2016
Loc

Tetragonopterus

Melo 2016: 709

2016