Dysphaea ulu, Hämäläinen, Matti, Dow, Rory A. & Stokvis, Frank R., 2015

Hämäläinen, Matti, Dow, Rory A. & Stokvis, Frank R., 2015, Revision of the Sundaland species of the genus Dysphaea Selys, 1853 using molecular and morphological methods, with notes on allied species (Odonata: Euphaeidae), Zootaxa 3949 (4), pp. 451-490 : 472-476

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3949.4.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B3123099-882F-4C42-B83B-2BA1C2906F65

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5691009

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F487E5-FFC1-FFFE-FF78-0C454D219832

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Dysphaea ulu
status

sp. nov.

Dysphaea ulu View in CoL spec. nov.

( Figs. 11 View FIGURES 9 – 12 , 15 View FIGURES 13 – 18 , 28 View FIGURES 25 – 30 , 33 View FIGURES 31 – 36 , 39 View FIGURES 37 – 40 , 43 View FIGURES 41 – 44 , 47 View FIGURES 45 – 48 , 51 View FIGURES 49 – 52 , 55 View FIGURES 53 – 56 , 61 View FIGURES 57 – 62 , 67 View FIGURES 63 – 68 , 73 View FIGURES 69 – 74 , 80 View FIGURES 77 – 82 , 85 View FIGURE 85 )

Dysphaea dimidiata View in CoL [nec Selys, 1853];— Schmidt (1934: 330–331, part: Baram, plate 16, fig. 8);— Lieftinck (1954: 19–20, part: Borneo);— Orr (2001: 178, specimens from Kuala Belalong Field Studies Centre, Sites 1,2; except one male which was D. dimidiata Selys, 1853 View in CoL );— Orr (2003: 37, part; 58 part; p. 59, fig. 72; plate 3h);— Orr (2005: 26, illustration);— Dow (2005: 11, Gunung Mulu National Park, part);— Dow & Reels (2008: 3, Gunung Mulu National Park, part);— Dow & Reels (2009: 13, Mount Dulit);— Dow & Reels (2010: 15, Kubah National Park, part);— Dow, Reels & Butler (2013a: 9, Dulit range);— Dow, Reels & Butler (2013b: 11, Kubah National Park, part).

Dysphaea limbata semilimbata View in CoL [nec Selys, 1873];— Laidlaw 1920: 328 (specimen from Baram).

Dysphaea View in CoL species;— Dow, Reels & Ngiam (2015: 11, Usun Apau).

Material studied: Holotype ♂ (SAR13_14_EUP15): Borneo, Sarawak, Miri division, Upper Baram, Sungai Pejelai, Ulu Moh, 24 viii 2014, leg. M. Tegong. Deposited at RMNH, Leiden. Paratypes (47 ♂, 2 ♀; all from Borneo; deposited in Coll. Dow unless otherwise stated).—From Sarawak: 1 ♀ (SAR13_14_EUP15, in tandem with holotype), Sarawak, Miri division, Upper Baram, Sungai Pejelai, Ulu Moh, 24 viii 2014, leg. M. Tegong; 3 ♂ (SAR13_14_EUP24–26), same location and date as above, leg. N. Sigau; 1 ♂ (SAR13_14_EUP23), same location as above, 26 viii 2014, leg. M. Tegong, E. Aran & N. Sigau; 1 ♂ (SAR13_14_EUP29), same location as above, 27 viii 2014, leg. E. Aran & O. Udau; 1 ♂ (SAR13_14_EUP19), Sarawak, Miri division, Upper Baram, tributary of Sungai Pejelai, Ulu Moh, 23 viii 2014, leg. Y. Tegong; 1 ♂ (SAR13_14_EUP35), same area as above, Sungai Moh, 24 viii 2014, leg. R.A. Dow; 1 ♂ (SAR13_14_EUP27), same area as above, Sungai Sii, 10 vii 2014, leg. R.A. Dow; 1 ♂ (SAR13_14_EUP34), same location as above, 12 vii 2014, leg. R.W.J. Ngiam; 1 ♂ (SAR13_14_EUP36), same location as above, 13 vii 2014, leg. N. Pawi; 1 ♂ (SAR13_14_EUP31), same location as above, 15 vii 2014, leg. O. Udau; 1 ♂ (SAR13_14_EUP17), same location as above, 17 vii 2014, leg. O. Udau; 1 ♂ (SAR09_10_EUP142, in RMNH: RMNH.INS.503424), Sarawak, Miri division, Upper Baram, Sungai Pawan, 19 vii 2010, leg. L. Southwell; 2 ♂ (SAR06_EUP18–19), Sarawak, Miri division, foot of Mount Dulit, Sungai Nuam, 30 iii 2006, leg. R.A. Dow; 1 ♂ (SAR06_EUP17, in RMNH: RMNH.INS.509905), same area as above, Sungai Long Aton, 31 iii 2006, leg. G.T. Reels; 1 ♂ (SAR09_10_EUP100; Coll. Hämäläinen), Sarawak, Miri division, Upper Tinjar River, Sungai Lobang, 4–5 v 2010, leg. L. Southwell; 1 ♂ (SAR11_12_EUP159), Sarawak, Miri division, Usun Apau National Park, Sungai Julan, 1 v 2012, leg. C. Wilfred; 1 ♂ (SAR07_8_EUP48, in RMNH: RMNH.INS.509906), Miri division, Gunung Mulu National Park, foot of Gunung Mulu, stream on old trail to Sarawak Chamber, 10 ix 2008, leg. R.A. Dow; 1 ♂ (SAR05-EUP57; Coll. Hämäläinen), Sarawak, Miri division, Gunung Mulu National Park, Long Lansat, 19 iv 2005, leg. R.A. Dow; 1 ♂ (SAR05-EUP31), Sarawak, Miri division, Kelabit Highlands, Bario area, Pa’Dapur river, 5 iv 2005, leg. G.T. Reels; 1 ♂ (SAR06_EUP33), Sarawak, Kuching division, Matang Range, Kubah National Park, Sungai Rayu at Matang Wildlife Centre, 25 i 2006, leg. G.T. Reels; 2 ♂ (SAR07_8_EUP37; SAR07_8_EUP 49 in RMNH: RMNH.INS.509907), Sarawak, Sri Aman division, Batang Ai National Park, Sungai Bebiong Besar, 4 xii 2007, leg. R.A. Dow; 1 ♂ (SAR07_8_EUP12), same location and date as above, leg. G.T. Reels; 3 ♂ (SAR13_14_EUP7–8, SAR13_14_EUP 2 in RMNH: RMNH.INS.557687), Sarawak, Kapit division, Lanjak Entimau Wildlife Sanctuary, Ulu Katibas, Sungai Datai, 22 viii 2013, leg. R.A. Dow; 1 ♂ (SAR13_14_EUP12), same location and date as above, leg. J. ak Awan & M. ak Adau.—From Brunei: 2 ♂ ( RMNH, ex. collection P. Mill), (Temburong district), Ulu Temburong, 1978 , leg. S.L. Sutton; 1 ♂ ( RMNH), 1 ♀ (Coll. A.G. Orr) Brunei (Temburong district), Kuala Belalong Field Studies Centre, iii 1991, leg. A.G. Orr; 1 ♂ ( RMNH), same data, x 1991; 1 ♂ ( RMNH), same data, vii 1992; 1 ♂ ( RMNH), same data, 29 ix 1992; 1 ♂ ( RMNH), same data, 23 i 1993; 1 ♂ ( RMNH), same data, vii 1993; 1 ♂ ( CUMZ), Brunei, Temburong, 10 x 1978, leg. T. Harman (ex coll. D.A.L. Davies); 3 ♂ ( CUMZ), Brunei, Snake Creek, 16 ii 1982, leg. T. Harman (ex coll. D.A.L. Davies).—From Sabah: 3 ♂ ( RMNH), Sabah, 105 km S of Beaufort, Long Pasia area, Sungai Padas, S. of Kampong Long Pasia, 1030 m asl., 4 24’N, 115 44’E, 12–13 iv 1987, leg. J. van Tol; 1 ♂ ( RMNH), Sabah, surr. Long Pasia, Sg. Matang, leg. J. van Tol.; 2 ♂ ( CUMZ), Borneo, Sabah, Maliau Basin, tributary to Sungai Maliau near Maliau Basin Field Centre, 14 v 2013, leg. S. Luke.

Etymology. The species epithet is based on the word ‘ulu’, the form generally in use in Borneo of the Bahasa Melayu/ Indonesia word ‘hulu’, which means upstream. The species epithet is used as a noun in apposition. The species typically inhabits ‘upstream’ habitats.

Diagnosis. A narrow-winged Dysphaea species with male wings broadly opaque at basal half and at wing tips. Cerci with lower border nearly straight in lateral view.

Description of holotype male ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ). Head: Labium, labrum, base of mandibles and clypeus shining black, frons and vertex matt black.

Thorax: Matt black, with very faint obscure brown marking on metepisternum above second lateral suture and similar marking on metepimeron ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ). Venter of thorax without tiny tubercles on metaposternum ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ). Legs wholly black.

Wings: Basal half of wings opaque black with strong metallic blue reflections. In Fw opaque area extends to level of 3–4 cells before nodus, except in costal field where the opaque stripe extends 1 or 2 cells beyond the nodus. Otherwise costal field between nodus and pterostigma hyaline. In Hw basal opaque area extends more apicad, not quite reaching half way between nodus and proximal border of pterostigma; costal field between nodus and pterostigma opaque throughout. Tips of wings narrowly opaque, in Hw slightly more extensively than in Fw ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ). Venation typical of genus. Fw with 37 antenodals in first row; Hw correspondingly with 27 antenodals. Quadrangle with 2 crossveins in Fw, 2–3 in Hw. Pterostigma long and narrow, broadest in middle; covering 14 underlying cells.

Abdomen: Matt black throughout. Appendages black; cerci in dorsal ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 31 – 36 ) and ventral view of typical shape for genus; in lateral view ventral margin of cercus almost straight ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 37 – 40 ). Paraprocts very short, rounded and featureless.

Penis: Terminal segment with two apical arms directed upwards on either side of shaft, turning out and down for short distance at ends, slightly expanded in this part ( Figs. 43 View FIGURES 41 – 44 , 47 View FIGURES 45 – 48 ).

Measurements (mm). Fw 33, Hw 31, abdomen (apps. excl.) 35.5, cerci 2.

Description of female ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 49 – 52 ). Head: Labium shining black with lateral lobes largely yellow, with black hooks. Labrum shining black, with broadly yellow centre, indented by black basally. Base of mandibles largely yellow, with black incomplete stripe medially. Clypeus shining black with narrow yellow stripe along ridge. Frons matt black with sides below antennae yellow, yellow colour continuing over genae ( Fig. 55 View FIGURES 53 – 56 ). Antennae black. Vertex and occiput matt black, with two tiny yellow spots on occiput.

Thorax: Prothorax black with rounded large yellow spots on either side of dorsum of middle lobe. Posterior part of hind lobe raised obliquely upwards to form an elongate rectangular flap, which is narrowly bordered by yellow, more broadly so at sides ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 57 – 62 ). Lateral parts of flap not prominent, lying in ca same plane as median part. Synthorax matt black, with moderately narrow yellow stripes as in Figs. 67 View FIGURES 63 – 68 , 73 View FIGURES 69 – 74 . Yellow stripes on mesepisternum not connected at wing base, but those on metepimeron forming a loop at wing base. Legs black, with yellow markings on both apical and posterior sides of coxae and obscure streaks on hind femora.

Wings: Hyaline with broad blackish opaque streaks in middle section of wings, at base from subcostal field to MA, costal field and much of lower part of wing hyaline ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 49 – 52 ). In Fw opaque streak extends to level of 12 cells before nodus, in Hw it extends gradually narrowing to proximal end of pterostigma. Apex of Fw narrowly darkened, slightly more extensively on Hw. Fw with 37 antenodals in first row; hindwings with 26–28. Quadrangle with 3 crossveins in Fw, 5 in Hw. Pterostigma long, covering 11–13 underlying cells.

Abdomen: Matt black, with yellow markings as follows: S1 with lateral spot, extending upwards and downwards at apex of segment. S2–7 with lateral stripe, broadest on S2–3 and gradually narrowing towards apical segments. Separate small lateral spots at base of S3–7. On S2–5 stripe occupies almost whole segment length, on S6–7 stripe is interrupted.

Measurements (mm). Hw 31.5–33, abdomen (apps. excl.) 30.5–32, cerci 1.

Variation in male paratypes. In some specimens the pale markings on the synthorax are slightly more distinct, in others they are entirely absent; clearly this is an age dependent character. The extent of the opaque area in wings is somewhat variable. In some specimens the opaque basal area in the Fw extends to the level of the nodus or even 1–4 cells beyond the nodus (up to 8 in costal field) and in Hw beyond half way between the nodus and proximal border of pterostigma. There is also some slight variability in venational details.

Measurements (mm): Hw 27.5–32.5, abdomen (apps. excl.) 32.5–37.

Distinguishing characters. Male: Superficially D. ulu male closely resembles D. dimidiata , a species with which it co-occurs in many locations in northern Borneo. However, these species are easy to separate by the shape of cercus as seen in lateral view; in D. ulu ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 37 – 40 ) the ventral margin of the cercus is almost straight, but distinctly arched in D. dimidiata ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 37 – 40 ). Other characters, although less consistent, include the colour of the costal field between nodus and pterostigma in the Fw; in D. ulu ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 25 – 30 ) the field is hyaline, but in most specimens of Bornean D. dimidiata the costal field in the Fw is opaque ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 19 – 24 ). In D. ulu the venter of the thorax is always without tiny tubercles on metaposternum ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ), whereas in Bornean D. dimidiata they are almost always present ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ). There are also differences in the shape of the apical arms of the penis: the terminal, upward directed part is distinctly shorter in D. ulu than in D. dimidiata , best seen in lateral view (cf. Figs. 45 and 47 View FIGURES 45 – 48 ), and is more rounded in ventral view (cf. Figs. 41 and 43 View FIGURES 41 – 44 ). Female: D. ulu is easy to separate by the distinct opaque streak in both wings ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 49 – 52 ). In D. dimidiata the wings are largely hyaline or semihyaline with brownish tinge, the tips being slightly darkened ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 49 – 52 ). In D. ulu the yellowish stripes on thorax are narrower ( Fig. 67 View FIGURES 63 – 68 ) than in D. dimidiata ( Figs. 63– 65 View FIGURES 63 – 68 ). D. ulu lacks the conspicuous yellow stripe on antefrons ( Fig. 55 View FIGURES 53 – 56 ), which is often present in D. dimidiata ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 53 – 56 ).

Remarks. Some published records on Bornean Dysphaea species still remain uncertain as regards the real identity of the species. The D. dimidiata record from Lanjak Entimau Wildlife Sanctuary in Sarawak by Norma- Rashid & al. (2010, p. 326) could refer to either to D. dimidiata or D. ulu ; both species are known to occur there. The D. dimidiata record from ‘ Sarawak, Kampong Seku’ by Asahina (1966) might just as well refer to D. ulu .

RMNH

National Museum of Natural History, Naturalis

CUMZ

Chulalongkorn University Museum of Natural History

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Odonata

Family

Euphaeidae

Genus

Dysphaea

Loc

Dysphaea ulu

Hämäläinen, Matti, Dow, Rory A. & Stokvis, Frank R. 2015
2015
Loc

Dysphaea

Dow 2015: 11
2015
Loc

Dysphaea limbata semilimbata

Laidlaw 1920: 328
1920
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF