Perla persica Zwick, 1975

Teslenko, Valentina A., Palatov, Dmitry M. & Semenchenko, Alexander A., 2024, Overview of the Caucasian Perla Geoffroy, 1762 (Plecoptera: Perlidae) based on morphological and molecular data with description of two new species, Zootaxa 5507 (1), pp. 1-56 : 10-17

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5507.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:065ECECA-5F0B-47BE-82FC-6C1F68B316FD

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13751042

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F4BB77-FFF9-CE17-FF03-9406D995FE89

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Perla persica Zwick, 1975
status

 

Perla persica Zwick, 1975 View in CoL

Figs. 24‒49 View FIGURES 24‒27 View FIGURES 28‒31 View FIGURES 32‒35 View FIGURES 36‒41 View FIGURES 42‒43 View FIGURES 44‒49

Zwick, 1975: 392‒394, figs. 19‒23 (original description);

Zwick, 1978: 236 (synonymy proposed);

Sivec & Stark, 2002: 13 (as Perla caucasica ).

Remarks. In our collections, a few specimens from Iran and North Ossetia-Alania correspond to the original description of P. persica in Zwick (1975). Zwick (1978) considered the possibility of a synonymy between P. persica and P. abbreviata , but without studying the holotype of P. abbreviata , this question remained unresolved. Nevertheless, both species were proposed to be considered synonyms of P. caucasica based on a comparison of the eggs of topotype specimens from Alborz with the eggs of P. caucasica from the Caucasus ( Sivec & Stark 2002). Notably, the female subgenital plate of the P. persica ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 28‒31 ) and P. caucasica specimens, as well as the chorion structures ( Figs. 36‒41 View FIGURES 36‒41 ) and larvae appearance ( Figs. 42‒49 View FIGURES 42‒43 View FIGURES 44‒49 ), are very similar, except for the body color of P. persica adults, which is much darker and more contrasting ( Figs. 24‒27 View FIGURES 24‒27 ) than that of P. caucasica . Additionally, males of P. persica are brachypterous ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 24‒27 ), whereas the wing length of P. caucasica males is usual. Upon closer examination of the male genitalia of P. persica , several morphological differences were discovered that are important and diagnostic. Perla persica and P. caucasica can be clearly distinguished by the male hemitergal structure and chaetotaxy of the penis. The shape of the hemitergal hook of P. caucasica is tapered towards its rounded apex ( Figs. 2, 5 View FIGURES 1‒6 , 7 View FIGURES 7–10 ). The hemitergal hook of P. persica is distinguished by a plump, rounded rectangular tip in profile and, at the same time, an almost spatula-like flat shape in dorsal view ( Figs. 28‒29, 31‒32 View FIGURES 28‒31 View FIGURES 32‒35 ). The penis of P. caucasica is armed with two brushes of setae: a typical apical brush and an additional small ventral brush of tiny setae ( Figs. 10 View FIGURES 7–10 , C‒D). In contrast, the penis of P. persica bears a single apical brush of setae at the apex ( Figs. 32‒35 View FIGURES 32‒35 ). In our opinion, these significant morphological differences indicate that P. persica should be considered a valid species rather than a synonym of P. caucasica . Reinstating the original name of Perla persica from synonymy on external and internal morphological features of males is proposed.

DNA barcoding. GenBank accession numbers are PP216463-PP216464 and PP216468-PP216469. According to phylogenetic relationships, P. persica and P. caucasica would be monophyletic if not for the specimen P. caucasica TVA 364 from Adygea, which fell into the clade of P. persica . The DNA barcode of this specimen was identical to P. persica TVA 199 therefore the minimum interspecies distances were zero ( Table 2 View TABLE 2 ). Four methods of species delimitation united both species into a single mOTU ( Fig. 160 View FIGURE 160 ). This indicates that P. persica and P. caucasica are closely related species and have a recent common ancestor. Further molecular study with nuclear markers is needed to resolve the discrepancy between morphological and molecular characters.

Material examined. Iran: 3♂, 4♀, 5 larval ♂, 2 larval ♀, 2 exuvia, Central Alborz, Mazandaran province, Zarrin Kamar village, Nurrud River , Haraz River Basin , altitude 1900 m above sea level, 36.205033 N, 51.82055 E, 25. VI. 2019, coll. D. Palatov. GoogleMaps Russia, Republic of North Ossetia-Alania : 2♂, 2♀, 3 exuvia, Alagirsky District, Komdon River, in the area of the Tsey Gorge , Tseydon River Basin , Terek River Basin , altitude 1832 M above sea level, 42.803514 N, 43.933395 E; 25.07.2021, coll. D. Palatov GoogleMaps ; 1 larva, Prigorodny District, Mairamadag River, Terek River Basin , altitude 690 m above sea level, 42.993308 N, 44.49815 E, coll. D. Palatov. GoogleMaps

Distribution. Iran: Alborz Mountains, Fars, Teheran, and Mazandaran Provinces. Perla persica was found in the streams and rivers of the northern slopes of the Greater Caucasus, Russia, and North-Ossetia-Alania for the first time ( Fig. 159 View FIGURE 159 ). The species was found in the Komdon River, which flowed down steeply by waterfalls on the dry slope of the Tsey Gorge in a narrow bushy ravine. The river has a width of 3−4 m, a bottom with pebbles and stones without fouling, water current of 0.3−0.7 m /s, and an altitude of 1700−1900 m above sea level.

The ecological differences between P. persica and P. caucasica are currently difficult to assess due to the scarcity of information about their environments. In our collections, both species were found together in the Mairamadag River ( Table 1 View TABLE ). However, according to our collections and the original description ( Zwick 1975), P. persica inhabits mainly an altitude of 1770–1900 m above sea level. Perla caucasica , as we assume, is a relatively low-mountain and warm-water species and has been recorded at altitudes of up to 700 m.

VI

Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Plecoptera

Family

Perlidae

Genus

Perla

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF