Eggersanthus, Sittichaya & Smith, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4779.2.9 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3F24EA5B-55BB-4B3C-B321-4B59F6167E52 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3851215 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F57168-314D-5642-C8D9-30F4C2ECF845 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eggersanthus |
status |
gen. nov. |
Eggersanthus , gen. nov.
( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A–G)
Type species: Webbia sublaevis Eggers, 1927 View in CoL
Material examined. Holotype, female: USNM, PHILIPPINES, Mindanao , Provinz Surigao , Surigao ; Nontypes : females, lowland tropical rain forest of the Ton Nga Chang Wildlife Sanctuary , Songkhla province, Thailand (6°59’32.1”N 100°08’57.8”E) (3, WST). GoogleMaps
Diagnosis: Eggersanthus is most similar to Arixyleborus ( Figure 2 View FIGURE 2 and Table 1) and can be separated from other xyleborine genera by the following combination of characters: pronotum in dorsal view rectangular (type a in Hulcr et al. 2007), anterior margin weakly concave, without a median row of serrations, corners sharply quadrate, anterolateral corners asperate with 4–5 serrations forming a 90° angle; pronotum in lateral view with disc longer than anterior slope (type 7 in Hulcr et al. 2007); antennal funicle 4-segmented, club obliquely truncate type 2 ( Hulcr et al. 2007), approximately circular, as long as wide, segment 1 corneous, nearly encircling anterior face, segment 2 pubescent, visible on anterior face only; elytral declivity with granulate striae and interstriae; protibiae very slender, distinctly triangular, posterior face flat and unarmed; scutellum large, triangular, clearly visible from dorsal view; elytra attenuate; and no mycangial tufts present.
Description: Female. Length 2.05–2.2 mm and 2.73–2.90 times as long as wide (n = 4). Body color light brown to brown, darker in appearance on pronotum anterior slope and elytral declivity.
Head. Mandibular base broad, mandibles short. Epistoma with long yellowish setae arranged in a single row. Frons flat, shagreened, with an indistinct small flat median line; vestiture of fine hairs of variable length. Eye comparatively large, shallowly emarginate at antennal insertion, lower portion distinctly larger than upper. Submentum shallowly impressed, shaped as a very narrow triangle. Antennal scape short and thick; pedicel cup-shaped, longer than funicle; funicle 4-segmented, antennal club type 2 ( Hulcr et al. 2007), moderate in size, approximately circular, as long as wide, segment 1 prominent, distinctly corneous, its margin convex, costate, nearly covering posterior face; second segment not sclerotized, soft, visible on anterior face only.
Pronotum. Robust, in dorsal view rectangular (type a in Hulcr et al. 2007), anterior margin weakly concave, without a median row of serrations, corners sharply quadrate, anterolateral corners asperate with 4–5 serrations forming a 90° angle, asperities on anterior slope short, moderately sized and coarse; disc shagreened; basal margin bisinuate; no mycangial tuft; pronotum in lateral view with disc longer than anterior slope (type 7 in Hulcr et al. 2007).
Scutellum. Clearly visible in dorsal view, comparatively large, triangular, flat, flush with elytra, impunctate.
Elytra. 1.53–1.63 times longer than wide; 1.53–1.63 times longer than pronotum, sides parallel from base to apical for three-fourths of length and then becoming gradually attenuate, apex acuminate. Base slightly bisinuate. Disc shining, striae and interstriae uniseriate punctate, striae with long setae, interstriae with minute shallow punctures and a row of shorter setae. Declivity rugose, dull, striae and interstriae granulate; striae uniseriate granulate, granules rhomboidal, very closely arranged; interstriae broader than striae, covered with one or two rows of irregular minute granules.
Legs. Protibiae very slender, distinctly triangular, outer margin straight, widest at apical margin, armed with 4 medium denticles clustered at apical quarter, one or two additional spines may be present on apical half, posterior side flat, finely setose. Procoxae contiguous. Prosternal posterocoxal process flat.
Etymology: Masculine, Eggers + Greek anthos = glory, meaning “glory of Eggers”. The name honors the late Dr. Hans Eggers, a prolific German bark beetle taxonomist who described the type species and has had a significant impact on bark and ambrosia beetle classification.
Distribution: PHILIPPINES, Mindanao; THAILAND, Songkhla province.
Biology: Unknown but probably similar to that of Arixyleborus and Webbia species which are specialized on Dipterocarpaceae and Fagaceae in Asia ( Browne 1958, 1961), though Papua New Guinean species are host generalists ( Hulcr & Cognato 2013).
USNM |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |