Plinthisus Stephens sensu Wagner, 1964

Sweet, Merrill H. & Slater, James A., 2004, An analysis of species­groups of the genus Plinthisus Stephens (Hemiptera: Rhyparochromidae) in the Ethiopian Region with the description of eight new species, Zootaxa 533, pp. 1-56 : 8-11

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.157231

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F227B130-5DAF-4BC2-9986-DC2076AA93CA

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6272633

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F9879A-AF30-AF7D-C405-FEC03493ED80

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Plinthisus Stephens sensu Wagner, 1964
status

 

Subgenus Plinthisus Stephens sensu Wagner, 1964 View in CoL

The following three groups fall under the nominate subgenus Plinthisus as defined by Wagner, but they are distinctive and each probably will be worthy of generic rank.

RUDEBECKI SPECIES­GROUP

Included species: Plinthisus (Plinthisus) rudebecki Slater, 1964 ( Figs. 9 View FIGURES 8 – 17 , 18 View FIGURES 18 – 27 , 29 View FIGURES 28 – 37 , 39 View FIGURES 38 – 50 , 62 View FIGURES 51 – 65 , 80, 81 View FIGURES 80 – 99 , 100 View FIGURES 100 – 108 )

As noted by Slater (1964), P. rudebecki is an isolated taxon in the African fauna. It is highly distinctive and forms part of the endemic element in the fauna of the southwest Cape. We place P. rudebecki in the nominate subgenus Plinthisus ( Wagner 1963, 1964) based on its elongate pronotum, punctate posterior pronotal lobe and profemur armed with two rows of spines. However P. rudebecki warrants recognition as a separate speciesgroup as shown by its large bucculae and abdominal structure with transverse 5–6 suture.

BRACHYOCCUS SPECIES­GROUP

Included species: Plinthisus (Plinthisus) brachyoccus n. sp., P. (P.) debaroensis Linnavuori, 1989 .

Plinthisus (Plinthisus) brachyoccus n. sp.

( Figs. 10 View FIGURES 8 – 17 , 20 View FIGURES 18 – 27 , 28, 28 View FIGURES 28 – 37 a, 41, 54, 55, 68, 84, 85, 102, 114)

Description. Macropterous male. Elongate, robust. Head and anterior pronotal lobe black to very dark chocolate brown. Tylus, anterior margin of pronotum, entire posterior pronotal lobe and femora bright reddish brown. Scutellum castaneous. Hemelytra strongly contrastingly testaceous. Tibiae, tarsi, labium and antennae yellowish, tinged with light tan. Ventral surface dark brown. Surface shining, but not strongly polished; sparsely clothed with inconspicuous short decumbent hairs, these more dense on head and abdominal venter; antennae with moderately long forward­directed hairs on distal ends of segment 2 & 3 and entire segment 4, a strong seta on inner surface of segment 1. A short (0.06) trichobothriumlike seta on eye and 3 setae on tylus; vertex apparently lacking a pair of trichobotriumlike setae ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ). Abdominal sternum 3 with cluster of 3 trichobothria, 2 short 1 long on each side of meson of sternum; sternum 4 with 1 trichobothrium on each side of meson, other two normal trichobothria extremely short, difficult to distinguish from body hairs. Trichobothria of abdominal sterna 5, 6, 7 just ventral (entad) and spiracles just dorsal (ectad) of shiny horizontal pseudosuture. Posterior trichobothrial pair on sternum 5 oblique, located on coalescent granulose spots just posterior (0.03) to spiracle and remote (0.15) from posterior margin of segment; trichobothria of sterna 6 and 7 near (0.06) posterior margins of sterna; dorsal trichobothrial hair of posterior pairs on sterna 6 and 7 relatively long (0.25), much longer than ventral trichobothrial hair. Entire exposed dorsal surface prominently punctate; punctures on anterior pronotal lobe large and coarse, nearly as large as those on posterior lobe. Propleura ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ), and area below shining dorsal margin of meso­ and metapleura ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18 – 27 ) coarsely punctate­rugulose; acetabula smooth, shining.

Head ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ) strongly declivent; vertex strongly convex. Tylus nearly attaining distal end of first antennal segment. Tylar sutures incised, converging caudad. Length of tylus 0.17, anterior width 0.12. Juga posteriorly strongly convex, anteriorly moderately tumid, apices subacute, almost attaining apex of tylus, jugal sulcus longer than length of eye. Lorum shining, a short low anterior carina along jugal sulcus. Antenniferous tubercles invisible from above; insertion of antennae below and in front of eyes. Ocelli large, oblong, 0.033 X 0.057, placed close (0.031) to inner margin of eye. Eyes narrow, elliptical, and transverse, of about 80 facets, height of eye (0.25) over twice as great as longitudinal length (0.12), and extending laterad to level of anterior pronotal angle. Bucculae relatively high, height (0.10) a little greater than width of first labial segment (0.092), narrowing posteriorly to become merely ridges at level of eyes, these ridges terminating caudad in an elongate V­shaped point at base of head. Visible head length 0.40, width 0.64; interocular space 0.46.

Pronotum ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ) convex, slightly higher across anterior than across posterior lobe. Lateral margins sharply carinate, narrowly explanate, forming submarginal pale grooves; margins noticeably sinuate, moderately constricted in region of transverse impression. Width across humeri slightly greater than across anterior lobe; anterior and posterior margins shallowly concave. Pronotal length 0.94, width across anterior lobe 1.18, width across humeri 1.28 (pronotal measurements from male paratype). Scutellum triangular, flat, length 0.78, width 0.82. Corium with lateral margins carinate, gently and evenly arcuate. Midline distance from apex of clavus to apex corium 0.72. Midline distance from apex of corium to apex of abdomen 0.56. Metathoracic scent gland auricle ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18 – 27 ) simple, produced as a low ledge above pleural surface, apex broadened, tear­drop shaped, and curving caudad; dorsal margin of auricle shining, groove and ventral margin granulose. Scent gland area coarsely granulose, small, covering only ventral (=inner) 1/3 of metepisternum, a narrow fringe extending dorsad along anterior margin of metepisternum nearly to dorsal callosed shining area below corium. Metapleural posterior flange weakly differentiated by depression from metapleuron. Posterior margin of flange nearly straight, dorsal corner rounded. Prosternum ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ) with anterior collar moderately narrow (length 0.14), delineated by weakly defined sulcus that is continuous with groove below lateral margin of pronotum. Mesosternum carinate anteriorly between forelegs, moderately produced and transversely rugose in lightly excavate area between coxal cavity ridges, median furrow absent; ridges adjacent to coxal cavities not deeply impressed mesally.

Abdomen maximum width 1.43, length 1.72. [Abdominal terga ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 38 – 50 ) 3–7 lightly arched, more sclerotized than 1 and 2, caudal margin of tergum 7 nearly straight, very slightly convex; sternal sutures 3–4 and 4–5 moderately dovetailed, suture 4–5 bent distinctly cephalad at level of trichobothria, (in female, sterna 4–5 free, intersegmental margin slightly bent cephalad at level of trichobothria); spiracle 5 a little closer (0.17) to posterior margin of segment than are other spiracles; spiracle 8 small but present; terga 1 and 2 ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 38 – 50 ) relatively wide (1.08), lightly sclerotized, with lateral margins cleft between terga. Plectrum ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 38 – 50 ) on tergum 1 moderately sclerotized, small, width 0.14, length 0.12, striae 1.7 µ apart. Abdominal tergum 3 longest in middle, very slightly carinate along posterior margin, tergal suture 3–4 curving slightly caudad; tergal sutures 4–5 and 5–6 dovetailed, sutures curving caudad so that tergum 6 on midline is shorter than either tergum 4, 5, or 7. Maximum width of terga (across 2 and 4) 1.08; medial tergal lengths 1–0.20, 2–0.05, 3–0.16, 4–0.39, 5–0.33, 6–0.17, 7–0.28. Scent gland scar widths 3–4: 0.03 (anterior scent gland absent or a single pore), 4–5: 0.15, 5–6: 0.20. Terga 6 and 7 and posterior 1/3 of tergum 5 inflexed and grooved laterad to receive connexivum. Connexivum relatively wide, widest across junction of hypopleurites 5 and 6, narrowed cephalad and caudad. Epipleurites 3–6 relatively wide (0.05); hypopleurites 5–6 juncture oblique, others transverse, epipleurite 6 narrowed caudad; hypopleurite widths 2–0.03, 3– 0.6, 4–0.9, 5–0.11, 6–0.12, 7–0.04; lengths 2–0.07, 3–0.18, 4–0.25, 5–0.36, 6–0.47, 7– 0.37; tergum 7 and sternum 7 internally lightly impressed for reception of segment 8 and genital capsule, two apodemes 0.04 apart on anterior margin of sternum 8. Genital capsule ( Figs. 54 & 55 View FIGURES 51 – 65 ) width 0.36, posterior rim nearly transverse, bluntly carinate; dorsal opening large compared to clasper opening, parandria slender, fingerlike; epiproct and paraprocts fused into a ringlike structure open ventrally ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 51 – 65 ); anal sclerites a flaplike structure. Clasper ( Fig. 68 View FIGURES 66 – 79 ) straight with small carina under the inner projection; small hairs on tip and three setae on mesal surface of blade. Phallus ( Figs. 84 & 85 View FIGURES 80 – 99 ) moderately long with sleeve extending half way up the gonoporal process; wings of reservoir very small on distal part of body near neck; holding sclerites small and slender. Spermatheca ( Fig.102 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ) very unusual in lacking basal duct, having only sclerotized distal duct; bulb hemispherical. Valvulae length 0.52].

Profemur ( Fig. 114 View FIGURES 110 – 120 ) strongly incrassate, armed below with 2 rows of spines; inner row with 2 or 3 very large spines; metatibia with two rows of 4 and 1 spurs; mesotibia with two rows of 3 and 2 spurs. Labium elongate, extending between metacoxae. Length labial segments: I 0.44, II 0.50, [III 0.42, IV 0.30]. Antennae with segments 2 and 3 distinctly clavate. Length antennal segments: I 0.21, II 0.40, III 0.61, IV 0.40. Total body length 3.80.

Brachypterous form: Coarsely punctate (as in macropter) over entire hemelytron. Clavus and corium fused. Lateral corial margins carinate and evenly and narrowly convex. Apical hemelytral margin strongly angulate, slightly convex, laterally extending over anterior portion of tergum 6 but leaving most of tergum 5 exposed mesally; a distinct membrane remnant present. Length hemelytron 1.54, maximum width 0.72; length hemelytral commissure 0.68. Total body length 3.44.

Material Examined. HOLOTYPE: Macropterous male. CONGO: Lusinga, 1.760 m., Parc Nacional Upemba, 22­23­IV­1949 (Mis. G. F. de Witte 2540a). In Congo National Parks Museum, Brussels.

PARATYPES: CONGO: 1 male (macropter) same data as holotype. 1 female (brachypter) same data as holotype except 15­III­1947. 1 male (brachypter) Lusindoi, 27­VIII­ 1911 (L. Gengeon). In Museu do Afrique Centrale, in J. A. Slater and M. H. Sweet collections.

Etymology. The specific name brachyoccus is derived from the Greek, the prefix brachy­ from brachys, meaning short, and the stem ­occus from okkus, meaning eye, in reference to the greatly foreshortened eyes of this species, which is unique among the Plinthisinae .

Discussion. We place the Brachyoccus Species­Group in the subgenus Plinthisus sensu Wagner (1963, 1964) because the pronotum is relatively long as compared with its width and there are two rows of spines on the male profemur. However, P. brachyoccus differs from other known species of Plinthisus s. s. in having the entire dorsum evenly and coarsely punctate, and is especially distinguished by the narrow foreshortened eyes ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 8 – 17 ), which are unique within the genus Plinthisus . Also unique is the spermatheca ( Fig. 102 View FIGURES 100 – 108 ) in which the entire duct is sclerotized, whereas in all other Plinthisinae the duct is divided into a basal unsclerotized and a distal sclerotized duct.

We tentatively include P. debaroensis Linnavuori, 1989 in the Brachyoccus Species­ Group because the entire pronotum is similarly coarsely punctate and the male protibia is only slightly bent ( Linnavuori 1989). P. debaroensis differs from P. brachyoccus in having very small eyes (width 1/6 of interocular space) and being much smaller, 2.5 mm in length as compared to 3.4–3.8 mm for P. brachyoccus . Further study may show that these species to belong in separate species­groups.

HIRSUTUS SPECIES­GROUP

Included species: Plinthisus (Plinthisus) hirsutus Slater, 1964 . ( Figs. 10 View FIGURES 8 – 17 , 19 View FIGURES 18 – 27 , 30 View FIGURES 28 – 37 , 40 View FIGURES 38 – 50 , 51, 52 View FIGURES 51 – 65 , 67 View FIGURES 66 – 79 , 82, 83 View FIGURES 80 – 99 , 101 View FIGURES 100 – 108 , 113 View FIGURES 110 – 120 )

P. hirsutus Slater resembles superficially the subgenus Dasythisus Wagner, 1964 in having long upright hairs, a character Slater (1964) remarked on in comparing P. hirsutus to P. compactus (Uhler) . (The Nearctic species Plinthisus compactus (Uhler) , P. americanus Van Duzee , and P. indentatus Barber should be placed in the Palearctic subgenus Dasythisus.) However, unlike Dasythisus ( Fig. 112 View FIGURES 110 – 120 ), P. hirsutus does not have a large tooth­like spur midway on the male protibia ( Fig. 113 View FIGURES 110 – 120 ). Because the male protibia of P. hirsutus is distinctly bowed as in P. brevipennis ( Fig. 111 View FIGURES 110 – 120 ), the type species of Plinthisus (s. s.), rather than slightly bent as in Locutius ( Fig. 110 View FIGURES 110 – 120 ), and the brachypterous pronotum is relatively long as compared to its width (ratio 1.18) as in Plinthisus (s. s.), rather than relatively short as in Locutius (ratio 1.46), P. hirsutus fits Wagner's concept of the subgenus Plinthisus better than the subgenus Locutius and is therefore provisionally placed in the subgenus Plinthisus , although as indicated above and in the key, P. hirsutus certainly represents a distinct species­group. In support of the uniqueness of P. hirsutus is the unusual double plectrum (pl and spl) in the male abdomen ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 38 – 50 ), which may correspond to the unusually long stridulitrum ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 28 – 37 ), and in proctiger ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 51 – 65 ), the fusion of the epiproct and the paraprocts into a nearly circular structure surrounding a flaplike anal sclerite is unique, as is the sharp posterior lip on the genital capsule rim ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 51 – 65 ).

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF