Dichelops, Spinola, 1837

Klein, Joana Tartari, Barcellos, Aline, Grazia, Jocélia & Redaelli, Luiza Rodrigues, 2012, Contributions to the knowledge of Dichelops (Dichelops) with the description of a new species (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Pentatominae: Carpocorini), Zootaxa 3157, pp. 61-68 : 62

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3157.1.6

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4390430

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FD87B1-0834-FFFB-FF0D-FF2BF1E5721B

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Dichelops
status

 

Key to the species of subgenus Dichelops (modified from Grazia, 1978)

1. Humeri not projected, obtuse or bearing a small spine, at most barely surpassing rhomboid projections of posterolateral margins of pronotum (figs. 1‒3)............................................................................. 2

1´. Humeri projected as wide, subacute or acute at apex processes, or with long spines surpassing an imaginary longitudinal line crossing third tergite (fig. 4)............................................................................ 5

2. Superior process of pygophore present..................................................................... 3

2´. Superior process of pygophore absent......................................................... saltensis Grazia

3. Ventral rim with bristle tufts laterad to median notch (fig. 6); parameres twisted, head of paramere shorter than foot (fig. 10)........................................................................................ avilapiresi Grazia

3’. Ventral rim of pygophore without 1+1 bristle tufts laterad to median notch (figs. 7‒9); parameres not twisted (figs. 11‒13), head of paramere as long as foot.......................................................................... 4

4. Outer anterolateral angles of sternites with a small black spot; ventral rim of pygophore straight in the middle (fig. 7); gc8 tumescences wide, occupying inner 3/4 of each plate (fig. 18); capsula seminalis with three projections.... australis sp. nov.

4’. Outer anterolateral angles of sternites without a small black spot; ventral rim of pygophore with a mesial notch (fig. 9); gc8 tumescences narrower, occupying inner half of each plate (fig. 17); capsula seminalis with two projections..... pradoi Grazia

5. Juga abruptly convergent at tylus level, thence narrowing progressively towards acute apex.......................... 6

5´. Juga uniformly narrowing toward acute apex............................................................... 9

6. Humeri as broad projections, subacute apically, directed anterolaterad, just surpassing an imaginary longitudinal line across third connexivum..................................................................................... 7

6´. Humeri produced as long spines, acute apically, quite surpassing an imaginary longitudinal line across third connexivum.. 8

7. Ventral rim of pygophore uniformly concave, straight at middle, bristle tufts present only at distal angles (fig. 8); superior processes of dorsal rim produced as a spine......................................................... bicolor Distant

7´. Ventral rim of pygophore bisinuate, triangular projections not surpassing posterolateral angles of pygophore; bristle tufts at distal angles of ventral rim and also over triangular projections; superior processes of dorsal rim spatulate... peruanus Grazia

8. Posterolateral angles of connexivum well developed in acute tubercles; connexivum with darker castaneous punctures, anterolateral angles stained with black; ventral rim of pygophore largely concave, distal angles not projected, with bristle tufts; median bristle tufts of ventral rim absent; capsula seminalis with three teeth......................... punctatus Spinola

8´. Posterolateral angles of connexivum projected in little spines; connexivum with concolorous punctures; ventral rim of pygophore narrowly concave, distal angles projected inward, with bristle tufts; median bristle tufts of ventral rim present; capsula seminalis with two teeth............................................................... leucostigmus (Dallas)

9. Disc of head outlined by darker punctures; humeral angles in a spine just surpassing rhomboid projections of posterolateral margins of pronotum; posterolateral angles of connexivum with conspicuous spines; connexivum with castaneous punctures at apical third of each segment; ventral rim of pygophore projected inward in a narrow flap, sinuate in ventral view, distal angles with thick bristle tufts..................................................................... miriamae Grazia

9’ Disc of head not detached; humeral angles in long spines directed laterad, well surpassing an imaginary line across third connexivum; posterolateral angles of connexivum slighted projected, castaneous or black punctures at inner half of each segment, outer half with concolorous punctures; ventral rim of pygophore uniformly concave or sinuate at middle, with 1+1 triangular projections which surpass the posterolateral angles of pygophore; bristle tufts absent................... nigrum Bergroth

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Pentatomidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF