Physocephala Schiner, 1861
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.273851 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6251523 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE0236-1A20-FFD5-FF71-D084FA28F917 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Physocephala Schiner, 1861 |
status |
|
Physocephala Schiner, 1861 View in CoL View at ENA
Key for the Costa Rican species of Physocephala Schiner, 1861 View in CoL
1 Antennal groove completely and densely silver dusted (figure 27); haltere completely black; frons black (figure 27) ....................................................................................................... lugubris ( Macquart, 1835) View in CoL - Antennal groove not or only inconspicuously dusted (figure 30); haltere at least partly yellow (figure 29); frons partly yellow in many species (figure 30) ........................................................................................ 2 2 Mesopleuron without pubescent stripe (figure 9); knob of haltere completely dark black ....................... 3 - Mesopleuron with pubescent stripe; knob of haltere yellow or brown, at maximum a brownish darkening at tip ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 3 Gena uniformly dark (figure 10); antenna and proboscis at least partly darkened (figure 10); posterior dorsal corner of the katepisternum at most slightly dusted; tip of the female abdomen as figure 11: tergite 5 less curved and syntergite 6 shorter.................................................................... carbonaria ( Bigot, 1887) View in CoL - Gena lighter in the middle (figure 17); antenna and proboscis completely orange (figure 17); posterior dorsal corner of the katepisternum obviously dusted; tip of the female abdomen as figure 18: tergite 5 strongly curved and syntergite 6 quite long .................................................................. herrerai View in CoL spec. nov. The following four species are very similar and can be separated only by colouration characters-future research has to test if these are good species or only colour forms of one variable species.
4 Keel of the antennal groove black up to the base of the antenna (figure 14); mesoscutum black ................ .................................................................................................................... cayennensis ( Macquart, 1844) - Keel of the antennal groove black in the middle (figure 30) or completely orange; mesoscutum black or brown ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 5 Red brown species (figure 29); keel of the antennal groove regularly black in the middle; frons usually yellow and brown, without a black T-marking (figure 30) ....................................... wulpi Camras, 1996 - At least mesoscutum and the apical tergites blackish; keel of the antennal groove completely yellow; frons with T-marking (figure 23) ........................................................................................................................ 6 6 Scutellum black; wing as figure 25: radial cell r4+5 at the posterior side partly hyaline, radial cell r2+3 lighter apically ................................................................................................................ inhabilis ( Walker, 1849) - Scutellum orange-brown; wing with radial cell r4+5 and r2+3 completely dark ................................................ ....................................................................................................................... bipunctata ( Macquart, 1844)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Conopinae |