Catapagurus fimbriatus, Komai & Rahayu, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26107/RBZ-2021-0013 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C6DD0960-51EE-40C6-B948-BFAEF4E9F304 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FF878E-8C0E-1039-64EF-FBD987E9F9A6 |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Catapagurus fimbriatus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Catapagurus fimbriatus , new species
( Figs. 5–8 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig )
Material examined. Holotype: male (sl 1.5 mm), NMCR 50802, PANGLAO 2004, stn T27 , Bohol Sea , between Panglao and Pamilacan islands, 09°33.4′N, 123°51.0′E, 106–137 m, fine sand and mud with echinoderms, trawl, 25 June 2004. GoogleMaps
Paratype: 1 male (sl 1.4 mm), ZRC 2021.0414 View Materials , PANGLAO 2004, same data as holotype GoogleMaps .
Remarks. There were no female specimens available for Description. Shield ( Fig. 5A View Fig ) 1.2 times broader than long; study. The present new species is assigned to Catapagurus anterior margin between rostral lobe and lateral projections without hesitation because it agrees with the generic features concave; anterolateral margins sloping; posterior margin of Catapagurus , including the gill formula consisting of 11 truncate; dorsal surface with longitudinal rows of tufts of pairs of biserial gills, the somewhat reduced crista dentata short setae on midline and posterior to lateral projections; on the maxilliped 3 ischium, the presence of a prominent carapace lateral lobes narrow, well calcified. Rostral lobe preungual process on the pereopod 4 dactyli, and the broadly and roundly triangular, usually produced as far as possession of a long sexual tube arising from the right lateral projections. Lateral projections broadly and roundly pereopod 5 coxa in males, curving exteriorly and over the triangular, each usually with terminal, submarginal spinule. lateral side of the body ( McLaughlin, 2003, 2004). Posterior carapace 0.5 length of shield; posterolateral plates moderately wide anteriorly, drawn out into relatively thin Catapagurus exilidigitus , new species, appears close to C. bands reaching to posterior margins, posterior median plate tanimbarensis McLaughlin, 1997 , presently known only short, only weakly calcified.
from the Banda Sea, Indonesia, in the general armature and slenderness of the pereopod 2 and 3 dactyli. In particular, in Ocular peduncles ( Fig. 5A View Fig ) short (0.7 times as long as these two taxa, the dorsal spiniform or bristle-like setae on the shield), stout, widened distally; corneal width 0.7 peduncular mesial surfaces of the ambulatory dactyli are relatively few length. Ocular acicles narrowly triangular, slender, reaching compared to other species in the C. misakiensis group (20 or 0.3 length of ocular peduncle, terminating acutely; widely less versus more than 30) (de Saint Laurent & McLaughlin, separated.
2000; Asakura, 2001; McLaughlin, 2002; Komai &
Antennular peduncle ( Fig. 5A, B View Fig ) overreaching distal corneal margin by full length of ultimate article. Ultimate article 0.8 times as long as shield, 5.3 times as long as distal height, with tuft of long setae at dorsodistal margin and some short setae on dorsal surface. Penultimate article with few short setae. Basal article with very slightly produced, subacute ventrodistal margin; statocyst lobe gently inflated in proximal half of lateral margin.
Antennal peduncle ( Fig. 5A View Fig ) overreaching distal corneal margin by 0.7 length of ultimate article. Articles 5 and 4 with few, scattered short setae. Article 3 with few setae on unarmed ventrodistal angle. Article 2 with produced dorsolateral distal angle reaching to or beyond base of article 4, terminating in spine; dorsomesial distal angle with prominent spine. Article 1 with small spine at dorsolateral distal angle. Antennal acicle reaching distal margin of article 4 and reaching corneal base, terminating in spine. Flagella missing.
Maxilliped 3 endopod ( Fig. 5C View Fig ) moderately stout; merus with small dorsodistal spine; ischium with crista dentata consisting of 5 small teeth; accessory tooth prominent ( Fig. 5D View Fig ).
Right cheliped ( Fig. 6A–D View Fig ) long, moderately slender. Chela elongate subovate ( Fig. 6A View Fig ), 2.7 times as long as wide. Dactylus 0.9 length of palm; weakly convex dorsal surface almost smooth and with sparse tufts of setae; dorsomesial margin not delimited, rounded; occlusal margin with 2 blunt calcareous teeth, slightly overlapped by fixed finger. Palm subequal in length to carpus, 1.6 times as long as wide; dorsomesial and dorsolateral margins not delimited, dorsal and mesial surfaces minutely granular; ventral surface nearly smooth; fixed finger with sparse tufts of setae in distal half, occlusal margin with row of low, blunt calcareous teeth over entire length. Carpus ( Fig. 6D View Fig ) slightly shorter than merus, 2.7 times as long as distal width; dorsal surface with sparse granules, dorsomesial margin delimited with row of tiny spines in distal 0.3 and of minute granules proximally, and with few setae, dorsodistal margin unarmed; dorsolateral margin delimited with irregular row of spinules, and with few setae; lateral and mesial surfaces with sparse minute granules, ventral surface nearly smooth; all with covering of tiny or minute spinules, tubercles or granules. Merus subtriangular in cross section; dorsodistal margin with small spine; dorsal surface with widely spaced short setae; mesial and lateral faces almost smooth; ventrolateral and ventromesial margins each with small distal spine; ventral surface smooth, only with few short setae. Ischium unarmed on distolateral margin. Coxa with small ventromesial distal spine ( Fig. 1E View Fig ).
Left cheliped ( Fig. 7A–D View Fig ) slender, subequal in length to right cheliped; dactyl and fixed finger nearly straight. Chela ( Fig. 7A View Fig ) 4.8 times as long as wide. Dactylus 1.8 times as long as palm; surfaces almost smooth, with sparse tufts of setae; dorsomesial margin not delimited; occlusal margin with row of tiny corneous teeth in distal half, otherwise unarmed. Palm 0.5 length of carpus, 1.8 times as long as wide; dorsomesial and dorsolateral margins not delimited, dorsal, lateral and mesial surfaces with few setae and sparse minute granules; ventral surface slightly convex, smooth; fixed finger with smooth surfaces, few scattered long setae; occlusal margin with row of minute calcareous teeth in distal half, unarmed in proximal half. Carpus ( Fig. 7D View Fig ) slightly shorter than merus, 4.0 times as long as distal width; dorsomesial margin with row of spinules and few setae, dorsolateral margin with row of granules, becoming spinulose distally, dorsal surface with few granules distally, otherwise smooth; mesial and lateral surfaces with sparse granules, ventral surface smooth. Merus with small spine on dorsodistal margin, dorsal surface with row of widely spaced setae; lateral surface with sparse granules, mesial and ventral surfaces almost smooth, ventromesial and ventrolateral distal angles each with small spine. Ischium with small spine distolaterally. Coxa with small ventromesial distal spine ( Fig. 1E View Fig ).
Pereopods 2 ( Fig. 8A–C View Fig ) considerably overreaching tips of outstretched chelipeds. Dactyli narrowly blade-shaped, 1.1 times as long as propodi; in dorsal view, straight; in lateral view, gently curved ventrally; dorsal margins each with row of moderately spaced setae, becoming longer and more stiff distally; mesial faces ( Fig. 8C View Fig ) slightly concave, each with row of about 20 moderately spaced, stiff setae adjacent to ventral margin; lateral faces and ventral margins unarmed. Propodi approximately twice length of carpi; dorsal margins and lateral surface smooth, almost glabrous; mesial surfaces each with longitudinal rows of setae adjacent to dorsal and ventral margins. Carpi 0.6 length of meri; dorsal surfaces each with row of very small spinules, strongest distally; lateral, mesial and ventral surfaces almost smooth. Meri each with 1 small dorsodistal spine; dorsal surface with 2 small subdistal spines and widely spaced stiff setae; lateral and mesial faces glabrous; ventral surfaces with few short setae, ventrolateral distal angle with small spine. Ischia unarmed.
Pereopods 3 ( Fig. 8D–G View Fig ) distinctly longer than pereopods 2. Dactyli ( Fig. 8F View Fig ) narrowly blade-shaped, 1.3 times as long as propodi; in dorsal view, straight; in lateral view, gently curved ventrally; dorsal margins each with row of numerous, closely spaced setae, becoming longer and more stiff distally; mesial faces each with row of numerous setae adjacent to ventral margin; lateral surfaces and ventral margins unarmed. Propodi ( Fig. 8E View Fig ) approximately twice length of carpi; dorsal margins unarmed; mesial surfaces each with sparse granules and row of short setae adjacent to dorsal margins; lateral surfaces smooth; ventral margins each with row of short setae in distal 0.7. Carpi ( Fig. 8E View Fig ) 0.6 length of meri; dorsal surfaces each with row of very small spinules, strongest distally; lateral surface with sparse granules medially, mesial and ventral surfaces almost smooth. Meri each with 1 small dorsodistal spine; dorsal surface with 2 small subdistal spines and irregular rows of short stiff setae mesially; lateral surface with sparse granules; mesial surface smooth; ventral surfaces slightly granulate, bearing 3 spinules in paratype, no distinct spinule in holotype, ventrolateral distal angle unarmed. Ischia unarmed.
Pereopods 4 ( Fig. 5F View Fig ) weakly semichelate; dactyli each with well developed preungual process usually far extending beyond tip of claw; propodal rasp consisting of single row of corneous scales on distal half of ventral margin, distalmost scale longest. Pereopods 5 chelate.
Males with long right sexual tube curved dorsally over pleon and reaching pleonal midline, terminating in 2 small, unequal lobes ( Fig. 5G, H View Fig ). Left coxa lacking gonopore, having row of setae on ventral surface posteriorly ( Fig. 5G View Fig ).
Thoracic sternite 6 (pereopods 3) ( Fig. 5I View Fig ) with very wide, subtrapezoidal anterior lobe, much shorter than large posterior lobe; with row of short setae on anterior margin; posterior lobe much longer than anterior lobe. Sternite 8 consisting of two small rounded lobes widely separated.
Pleon in males with 3 unpaired, uniramous pleopods (pleopods 3–5); females unknown. Uropodal protopods not protruding posteriorly.
Telson ( Fig. 5J View Fig ) with lateral indentations suggesting separation of anterior and posterior portions; triangular posterior lobes separated by very wide, trapezoidal medial cleft, each terminating in subacute tip; oblique terminal margins unarmed.
Colouration in life. Not known.
Distribution. Presently known only from the Bohol Sea, central Philippines; at depths of 77– 137 m.
Remarks. There were no female specimens available for study. None of the two types is intact: in the holotype, the entire pleon is missing; in the paratype, both chelipeds and pereopods 2 are missing. Nevertheless, the new species is assigned to Catapagurus without hesitation because it agrees with the generic features, including the gill formula consisting of 11 pairs of biserial gills, the somewhat reduced crista dentata on the maxilliped 3 ischium, the presence of a prominent preungual process on the pereopods 4 dactyli and the possession of a long sexual tube arising from the right pereopod 5 coxa, curving exteriorly and over the lateral side of the body ( McLaughlin, 2003, 2004).
Catapagurus fimbriatus , new species, is readily distinguished from all other congeneric species in the characteristic setation of the pereopod 3 dactyli and propodi: the dactylus has a row of dense setae on the dorsal margin and on the mesial face adjacent to the ventral margin; the merus is also provided with setal rows on the mesial face adjacent to the dorsal margin and on the distal 0.7 of the ventral margin. Such setation is not seen in the 24 other species in the genus ( McLaughlin, 1997, 2002, 2004; Hogarth et al., 1998; de Saint Laurent & McLaughlin, 2000; Asakura, 2001; Komai & Osawa, 2009; Nucci & Melo, 2012; this study). The shape of the ambulatory dactyli of the present new species is also notable: the dactyli are slender as in species referred to the C. misakiensis species group as diagnosed by Asakura (2001; as C. japonicus group), but in this new species the shape is similar to the blade-shaped dactyli with shallow concave mesial faces of the C. ensifer species of Asakura (2001). As a result, this new species appears to be intermediate between the two species groups as proposed by Asakura (2001), and cannot be satisfactorily placed in either.
Etymology. The Latin fimbriatus (= fringed) refers to the characteristic setation of the ambulatory dactyli of the new species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |