Chilenuncia rostrata ( Maury, 1990 ) Porto & Derkarabetian & Giribet & Pérez-González, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.1207.120068 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8B2E2B5D-CA1D-4B61-8736-ECF013EDC384 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12734495 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4CE15F41-D4CA-4A1A-916A-46A441D3EF08 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:4CE15F41-D4CA-4A1A-916A-46A441D3EF08 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Chilenuncia rostrata ( Maury, 1990 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Chilenuncia rostrata ( Maury, 1990) comb. nov.
Figs 50 View Figure 50 , 51 View Figure 51 , 52 View Figure 52 , 53 View Figure 53 , 54 View Figure 54 , 55 View Figure 55
Nuncia rostrata Maury, 1990: 110, figs 25–35; Maury 1992: 4; Kury 2003: 22; Pérez-Schultheiss et al. 2019: 20; Pérez-Schultheiss et al. 2021: 412, fig. 3 a, d. View in CoL
Material examined.
Holotype. ♂ Chile. Llanquihue, Caleta La Arena, 50 km S de Puerto Montt, Carretera Austral , 07–08. XII. 1985 ( MACN 8703 View Materials ) . Paratype (allotype ♀). Chile. Llanquihue, Caleta La Arena, 50 km S de Puerto Montt, Carretera Austral , 07–08. XII. 1985 ( MACN 8704 ) . Paratypes. Chile. Llanquihue, Caleta La Arena, 50 km S de Puerto Montt, Carretera Austral , 07–08. XII. 1985 ( MACN 8705 ) .
Additional material.
Chile. Llanquihue: 35 km W. Río Negro, R. Schuh, N. Platnick coll., 24. I. 1986, 1 ♀ ( AMNH). Chiloé: Chiloé Island, 5 km N of Quellón, R. Schuh, N. Platnick coll., 01. XII. 1981, 1 ♀ 1 imm. ( AMNH), Isla Chiloé, R. Schuh, N. Platnick coll., 29. XI. 1981, 1 ♂ 1 ♀ ( AMNH). Llanquihue: P. N. Alerce Andino, N. Platnick, K. Catley, M. Ramírez, T. Allen coll., 23. XI. 1993, 1 ♀ 2 imm. ( AMNH). Palena: Termas de Pichicolo, 11 km west of Río Negro, Carretera Austral, E. Maury coll., 08. XII. 1985, 1 ♀ ( MACN 8706). Aysén: 30 km NE de Puerto Cisnes, E. Maury coll., 08. XII. 1986, 2 ♀ 3 imm. ( MACN 8707).
Diagnosis.
This species can be readily distinguished from C. chilensis by the prominent interocular apophysis, which is notably longer in C. rostrata . Additionally, C. rostrata possesses seven tarsomeres on leg II (males), whereas C. chilensis has six. These characteristics serve as key distinguishing features between the two species.
Distribution.
Chile: Los Lagos and Aysén Regions (Fig. 4 C View Figure 4 ).
Redescription of male
( MACN 8705). Measurements: Total length 2.97. Carapace length 1.07, dorsal scutum length 2.09, carapace max. width 1.49, mesotergum max. width 1.94. Appendage measurements: Pedipalps. Trochanter length 0.25, femora length 0.95, patella length 0.55, tibia length 0.68, tarsus length 0.66. Leg I: trochanter (tr) 0.25, femora (fe) 0.87, patella (pa) 0.50, tibia (ti) 0.70, metatarsus (mt) 0.89, tarsus (ta) 0.85. II: tr 0.33, fe 1.28, pa 0.54, ti 0.96, mt 1.08, ta 1.45. III: tr 0.32, fe 0.81, pa 0.43, ti 0.66, mt 0.77, ta 0.85. IV: tr 0.34, fe 1.15, pa 0.61, ti 0.95, mt 1.31, ta 1.03.
Dorsum (Fig. 50 View Figure 50 , 51 View Figure 51 ). Eta (η) hourglass-shaped dorsal scutum. Ocularium elevated, with a long, backward-curving apophysis. Eyes located laterally in the middle of the ocular structure. Dorsal scutum microgranulate and without clear delimitation of areas. Area I with a pair of setae, while areas II – IV display an arcuate row of small setae tubercles. Posterior margin characterized by a row of small setiferous tubercles. All free tergites with a row of small setiferous tubercles.
Chelicerae (Fig. 52 A, B View Figure 52 ). Segment I with a small tubercle on its dorso-distal surface; segment II with a mesal tubercle and bears a few setae.
Pedipalps (Fig. 52 C, D View Figure 52 ). Trochanter with a small dorsal and ectal tubercle. Femora with two ventroproximal and one ventromedial spine with subdistal setae, with two distal setiferous granules and three dorsoproximal tubercles with subdistal setae. Mesal surface of femora with 2–3 distal setiferous granules. Patella with a ventral setiferous tubercle. Tibia with four ectal and three mesal spines with subdistal setae, while the ventral surface presents small setiferous granules. Tarsus with three mesal and four ectal spines with subdistal setae, as well as a few setae and granules.
Legs (Fig. 53 View Figure 53 ). Coxa I with a row of setiferous tubercles, with two distal setiferous tubercles with subdistal setae. Coxae II – III also with setiferous tubercles, while Coxa IV with only microgranulation. Four bridges between legs II and III, and five or six bridges between legs III and IV. Spiracles not obstructed by bridges. A smooth surface covers ~ 1 / 3 of leg II, ¾ of leg III, and <1 / 3 of leg IV. Within the smooth area of leg II, two small tubercles with subdistal setae can be observed on each side. Sternum arrow-shaped, with a triangular posterior area. Smooth, covered in setae, without a notch on tarsus I. Tarsal count 4–7 – 4 – 4.
Penis (Figs 54 View Figure 54 , 55 View Figure 55 ). Pars distalis with large ventral cleft that divides the plate into two lamellae. Each lamella with three pointed macrosetae on the ventral surface and one macroseta on the dorsal surface. Capsula externa covers dorsal and lateral surfaces, exhibiting a small medial notch that divides the apical region of the capsula externa. With a dorsolateral plate attached to the pars basalis. Capsula interna slightly longer than capsula externa and partially covers the ventral plate. Capsula interna sac-shaped in appearance.
Female. Similar to male, with shorter pedipalpal femora and interocular apophysis.
Female measurements. Total length 3.17. Carapace length 0.98, dorsal scutum length 2.12, carapace max. width 1.38, mesotergum max. width 2.08. Appendage measurements: Pedipalps. Trochanter length 0.21, femora length 0.83, patella length 0.45, tibia length 0.59, tarsus length 0.62. Leg I: trochanter (tr) 0.23, femora (fe) 0.84, patella (pa) 0.52, tibia (ti) 0.69, metatarsus (mt) 0.82, tarsus (ta) 0.64. II: tr 0.30, fe 1.13, pa 0.52, ti 0.89, mt 0.92, ta 1.23. III: tr 0.30, fe 0.73, pa 0.40, ti 0.72, mt 0.79, ta 0.73. IV: tr 0.30, fe 1.13, pa 0.60, ti 0.90, mt 1.27, ta 0.93. Tarsal count: 3–6 – 4 – 4.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Laniatores |
Family |
|
Genus |
Chilenuncia rostrata ( Maury, 1990 )
Porto, Willians, Derkarabetian, Shahan, Giribet, Gonzalo & Pérez-González, Abel 2024 |
Nuncia rostrata
Pérez-Schultheiss J & Urra F & Oyarzún C 2021: 412 |
Pérez-Schultheiss J & Urra F & Otárola A 2019: 20 |
Kury A 2003: 22 |
Maury EA 1992: 4 |
Maury EA 1990: 110 |