Ischnochiton sp.

Dell’Angelo, Bruno, Schwabe, Enrico, Gori, Sandro, Sosso, Maurizio & Bonfitto, Antonio, 2014, Chitons (Mollusca, Polyplacophora) from São Tomé and Príncipe Islands, African Invertebrates 55 (2), pp. 171-200 : 176

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7680891

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B5CAA0D6-6F90-4311-899F-210544BFDCFF

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7674505

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/090387B4-F077-B45A-6B62-FC81FE7FF912

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Ischnochiton sp.
status

 

Ischnochiton sp.

Figs 2L–Q View Fig

Material examined: ST06: 1 specimen, length 2 mm ( BD 108 ).

Distribution: São Tomé Island.

Comparison and remarks: This specimen is characterized by a tegmental sculpture consisting of rough and closely spaced nodules, irregular in outline and irregularly distributed ( Figs 2O–P View Fig ). The dorsal girdle is beset with rectangular overlapping scales, bearing up to 11 strong ribs ( Fig. 2Q View Fig ).

Only five species of Ischnochiton are known from the northern and central Atlantic African coasts and islands, namely I. sererorum ( de Rochebrune, 1881) from Mauritania and Cape Verde Islands, I. cessaci ( de Rochebrune, 1881) from Mauritania, Senegal, Angola, Canary Islands and Cape Verde Islands, I. goreensis Thiele, 1909 from Senegal and Cape Verde Islands, I. paessleri Thiele, 1909 from Cape Verde Islands, and I. nicklesi Kaas & Van Belle, 1990 , from Senegal and Cape Verde Islands (Kaas & Van Belle 1990; Rolán 2005, 2011). However, all have a tegmental sculpture that is mainly smooth or finely granulose.

Congeners from South African Atlantic waters, namely I. textilis (Gray, 1828) , I. oniscus (Krauss, 1848) , I. bergoti (Vélain, 1877) , and I. elizabethensis Pilsbry, 1894 , could also be found along part of the southwest African coast but differ from the present specimen not only in their generally larger size, but they also have morphological peculiarities, summarized in Kaas and Van Belle (1990) and Sirenko and Schwabe (2002), that are lacking in this specimen, although their juvenile stages have not been carefully compared.

Description of a new species on the basis of the single small specimen is not justified, so it is preferable to leave the identification as Ischnochiton sp. until such time as more material becomes available.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF