Actinopus ducke, Miglio, Laura Tavares, Pérez-Miles, Fernando & Bonaldo, Alexandre B., 2020

Miglio, Laura Tavares, Pérez-Miles, Fernando & Bonaldo, Alexandre B., 2020, Taxonomic Revision of the Spider Genus Actinopus Perty, 1833 (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Actinopodidae), Megataxa 2 (1), pp. 1-256 : 41-43

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.2.1.1
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D8203766-9E7B-468F-9E75-F21393A1BA3D
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5655565
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0975136A-FFA5-CE77-FF77-FF4ED85A3426
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Actinopus ducke
status	sp. nov.

Treatment

Actinopus ducke View in CoL sp. nov.

Figs 33–35 View FIGURE 33 View FIGURE 34 View FIGURE 35 , Map 4 View MAP 4

Type material. Holotype male from 2° 58’ 5.9952” S 59° 55’ 49.9836” W, Reserva Florestal Adolpho Ducke, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, 1993, Wollscheid & Curd leg. ( MCN 24987) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: BRAZIL. Amazonas : Manaus, Reserva do Km 41, 02º 26’ S 59º 46’ W, 1♂, 05.viii.1996, G. Gascon leg. ( IBSP 110498 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; Reserva Florestal Adolpho Ducke , 2° 58’ 5.9952” S 59° 55’ 49.9836” W, 3♂, viii–ix.1993, Wollscheid & Curd leg. ( INPA 3512 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 15♂, ix.2010 ( INPA 6124 View Materials ) .

Etymology. The specific name is a noun in apposition from the type locality name.

Diagnosis. Males of A. ducke resemble those of A. pinhao ( Fig. 32 View FIGURE 32 A–C), A. hirsutus ( Fig. 38 View FIGURE 38 A–C), A. jaboticatubas ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 A–C) and A. confusus ( Fig. 44 View FIGURE 44 A–C) by the serrated area distal to PAc ( Fig. 32 View FIGURE 32 A–B); PA continuous to PAc ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 A–C), except in A. hirsutus ( Fig. 38 View FIGURE 38 A–C). They resemble A. paranensis ( Fig. 115 View FIGURE 115 A–C), A. hirsutus and A. jaboticatubas by the wider tegulum with robust BTA, placed medially on prolateral tegular surface ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 A–C). Males differ from those of A. pinhao and A. hirsutus by legs with few bristles and from all other species of the group by the presence of slots above PI, on prolateral tegular surface and pigmentation spots above PA on retrolateral view ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 A–C).

MALE (MCN 24987): Total length 19.25; Carapace, long 8.375; wide 7.5. Carapace rounded. Anterior eye row slightly procurved, posterior row recurved almost without interdistance AME–ALE ( Fig. 33 B View FIGURE 33 ). With short bristles between AME-clypeus. With one long bristle between ALE–ALP and many short and weak bristles between posterior eyes-fovea and lateral eyes-edge of carapace. Sternum with eight sigilla fused medially, two distal sigilla more fused than others ( Fig. 33 C View FIGURE 33 ). Rastellum protuberant, inverted V-shaped, hirsute, without spines apically ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 E–F). Chelicerae with six denticles along prolateral row of teeth. Prolateral row with five megateeth. Retrolateral row with five megateeth and two denticles between three basal megateeth ( Fig. 34 D View FIGURE 34 ). Patella and tibia III with distal crown of well-developed thorns, not interrupted in middle ( Fig. 34 View FIGURE 34 A–B). Patella IV with spines on prolaterodorsal face ( Fig. 34 C View FIGURE 34 ). Tibia IV without spines on dorsal surface ( Fig. 34 D View FIGURE 34 ). Ventral pseudoscopulae occupying 20% of tarsus I, 50% of II and 100% of III and IV. Pseudoscopula of tarsi I and II with setae spaced, forming diffuse group of bristles; On tarsi III and IV, compact. Carapace, chelicerae, sternum, coxae, trochantera, femora, patellae, tibiae, metatarsi and tarsi reddish brown; tibia of palp paler than other articles; Abdomen pale brown ( Fig. 33A View FIGURE 33 ). Eyes: Diameters: PME 0.28, PLE 0.32, ALE 0.52, AME 0.4; MOQ: Length 1.28, front width 2.84, back width 2.72; Interdistances: PME–PME 1.72, PLE–PME 0.02,AME–AME 0.24, ALE–AME 0.64, ALE–PLE 0.56, AME–PME 0.52. Ocular area: OAL 5, OAW 4.75, and IF 2.25. Body: Clypeus: 0.37; Fovea: 2.62; Labium: long 1.87; wide 1.37; Chelicerae: long 3.75; wide 1.87; Sternum: long 5.25; wide 4.12. Abdomen: long 9.12; wide 7.37. Leg measurements: I: Fe 7.75/ Pa 3.37/ Ti 5/ Me 5.25/ Ta 30.5/ total 51.87. II: 7.25/ 3.37/ 4.75/ 5.37/ 2.87/ 23.62. III: 6.62/ 3.62/ 3.75/ 5.25/ 3.12/ 22.37. IV: 9.12/ 3.87/ 7.37/ 6.37/ 3.5/ 30.25. Formula 4123. Spination: I—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0, d0, p0, r0; ti v0-0-1, d0, p0, r0-0-2; Me v4-7-5, d0, p0-0-1, r4-4-7; ta v0-2-6, d0, p0-3-4, r4-8-9. II—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0, d0, p0, r0; ti v0-4-3, d0, p0, r0-2-6; Me v7- 13-15, d0, p0-0-3, r4-7-8; ta v3-7-8, d0, p2-8-9, r4-6-8. III—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0, d6-8-25, p0-0-2, r0-0-5; ti v0, d1-0-10, p0-0-4, r0-0-3; Me v11-6-5, d0, p1-4-5, r1- 4-5; ta v0, d0, p6-7-6, r7-9-4; IV—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0, d8-6-2, p3-3-1 r0; ti v0, d0, p0, r0; Me v5-6-5, d0, p0-1-5, r1-1-4; ta v0, d0, p5-5-5, r2-5-7. Palp: PA poorly developed, embolus with three keels (PAc, PI and PS). Prolateral tegulum with slots above PI. BTA developed and placed medially on prolateral tegular surface; serrated area developed, positioned distal to prolateral accessory keel and next to base of next to base of embolus; embolar bases wider ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 A–C).