Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) cognata Cameron, 1939
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5032.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:65894101-2D60-426D-B149-4CF6E1C561BD |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0C1987AB-FFE2-297E-FF7E-A6D1B364FE74 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) cognata Cameron, 1939 |
status |
|
Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) cognata Cameron, 1939 View in CoL
( Figs 10–16 View FIGURES 10–16 )
Gyrophaena cognata Cameron, 1939: 106 View in CoL
Gyrophaena setiensis Pace, 2006: 355 View in CoL syn. nov.
Type material examined: Syntypes of Gyrophaena cognata Cameron 1939: 1 ♂ [dissected; labels as in Fig. 16 View FIGURES 10–16 ]: ‘Kashmir Gulmarg 8,000 –9,000 ft. vi-vii-1931 Dr. Cameron’, ‘SYN- TYPE’, ‘M. Cameron. Bequest. B.M. 1955– 147.’ ( BMNH); 1 ♀ [dissected]: ‘Kashmir | Gulmarg | 8,000 –9,000 ft. | vi-vii-1931 | Dr. Cameron’ <printed>, ‘SYN- | TYPE’ <round label with blue margin, printed>, ‘M. Cameron. | Bequest. | B.M. 1955–147.’ <printed> ( BMNH); 1 ♂, 1 ♀: ‘Kashmir | Gulmarg | 8,000 –9,000 ft. | vi-vii-[19]31 | Dr. Cameron’ <printed>, ‘SYN- | TYPE’ <round label with blue frame, printed>, ‘M. Cameron. | Bequest. | B.M. 1955–147.’ <printed> ( BMNH). All syntypes with additional handwritten label: ‘ Gyrophaena | cognata Cameron | Enushchenko I.V. | inv. 2019’.
Distribution. India (Kashmir), Nepal.
Remarks. Habitus as in Fig. 10 View FIGURES 10–16 .
Male. Dorsal plate of aedeagus moderately wide and long, S-shaped, in preapical portion with long, filiform flagellum, folded apically; ventral projection very wide, long, rounded mediodorsally and strongly curved in apical portion, with acute apex and rounded preapical part ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 10–16 ); ventral view of the aedeagus see in fig. 43 in Pace (2006). Abdominal tergite VII without tubercles. Apical margin of tergite VIII with three strong, long projections: two lateral projections slightly shorter than median projection ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 10–16 ). Apical margin of abdominal sternite VIII slightly concave ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 10–16 ).
Female. Abdominal tergite VII as that in male. Apical margin of tergite VIII truncated ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 10–16 ). Apical margin of sternite VIII somewhat rounded ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 10–16 ).
Pace (2006) described G. setiensis based on a single male from Nepal (‘Prov. Seti, Distr. Bajura, 19 km SW Simikot, Kuwadi Khola…’). Shapes of the aedeagus and male tergite VIII of G. cognata and G. setiensis Pace, 2006 are the same and they are thus conspecific (compare figs 11–12 and figs 41–44 in Pace (2006)). Thus, the latter species was synonymized with G. cognata .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) cognata Cameron, 1939
Enuschenko, Ilya V. & Shavrin, Alexey V. 2021 |
Gyrophaena setiensis
Pace, R. 2006: 355 |
Gyrophaena cognata
Cameron, M. 1939: 106 |