Siphonaria rodriguensis, B. W. Jenkins & Köhler, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.13.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14989368 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0D49832F-FF2F-82AF-FCCA-FB82FE70F876 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2025-03-05 09:04:49, last updated 2025-03-07 14:54:03) |
scientific name |
Siphonaria rodriguensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Siphonaria rodriguensis View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs 71I, Q–R View FIGURE 71 , 72E–F View FIGURE 72 )
Material examined. Type material. Holotype, from Rivière Banane 19°11.25’S, 63°22.866’E, N coast Rodrigues; coll. A. Meunier and O. Griffiths, RG01-1, 20 Aug 2018 ( AM C.585197 [SK330], Fig. 71I View FIGURE 71 ) GoogleMaps . Paratype same data as holotype ( AM C.585196 p [M427, SK133, protoconch D1], Fig. 71Q View FIGURE 71 ) GoogleMaps .
Other, non-type material. Rodrigues: Anse Quiter, SW coast, 19°46.183’S, 63°22.866’E, RG02-1 ( AM C.585888 p) GoogleMaps .
External morphology. Foot wall, mantle, cephalic folds and pneumostome evenly cream, foot sole darker, paler to foot edge; mantle translucent, narrower than foot wall, edge weakly lobed, thickened with broad white edge band; uneven dark/black pigmentation along foot wall and mantle join, concentrated over centre of cephalic folds.
Shell ( Figs 71I, Q View FIGURE 71 ; Table S9). Small sized (max sl mean = 8.8 mm, SD = 1.3 mm, n = 2), ovate; height medium; centrally broad, thickness thin; exterior even, smooth; protoconch direction weakly homostrophic (n = 2, Fig. 71Q View FIGURE 71 ), shell whorl dextral; apex offset to posterior and left of centre, apex offset growth reflected in apical ridge, apical banding fades from tan/brown at shell edge to pale protoconch; anterior and lateral apical sides convex, posterior weakly concave; ribs radiate from apex to shell lip, straight unraised, primary and secondary ribs indistinct, rib count (mean = 39.5, SD = 2.5, n = 2), primary ribs irregularly spaced, whitish, ridges narrow, dual ribs form siphonal ridge, secondary ribs brown/tan; shell edge un-scalloped, even; growth striae indistinct. Interior spatula glossy, white, inner margin to shell edge dark chocolate brown with narrow white rays aligning under primary ribs, extending from shell lip to inner margin; ADM scar indistinct; CMS straight; siphonal groove very weakly indented. Thickening or whitening of inner shell lip not observed.
Reproductive system ( Fig. 72E; n View FIGURE 72 = 4). Positioned within coelom under the respiratory cavity, epiphallic parts positioned between RAM and BM close to MG. ED joins at underside of small GA, AO joins underside of ED, short, blunt, narrower than ED, smaller than GA; ED thick, elongated, centrally twisted, broader at EG, narrower than AO; single broad curled stubby flagellum F1, appears as extension of ED at connection with EG; AO, GA and ED all muscular white tissue; EG broad, relatedly large, soft white tissue; BD and CD connect in parallel to GA at opposite sides of GA, BD without distal loop or MA; BD longer and slightly thinner than CD, both ducts smooth and pass together between RAM and inner foot wall connecting into thick layered folds of MG ( BD over CD); BC relatively large, spherical, embedded along with part of BD in AG / MG; SV embedded in AG under BC; HD short narrow, coiled, links large AG to a much smaller yellowish granulated HG, AG and MG folded, soft white tissue, with outer sides curved reflecting the close positioning to curvature of inner foot wall at right posterior quarter of coelom.
Spermatophore ( Fig. 72F View FIGURE 72 ). Broad head with short flagellum (length = 1.62 ± 0.1 mm, n = 4); test thin, whitish, smooth, featureless; head section broad cylindrical, bulbous, centrally bent, rounded tip; short tapering section merges head to filamentous flagellum; head longer, wider than translucent flagellum (head length = 1.04 ± 0.02 mm, ~ 70% of SPM length, head width = 99 ± 2 μm, flagellum width = 17 ± 0 μm, n = 4); 5 and 14 SPM tightly packed in BC ( AM C.585197, C.585196).
Comparative remarks. In our mitochondrial phylogeny, S. rodriguensis sp. nov. ( laciniosa group, unit 68) is the sister species of S. sipho (unit 24). Both species are closely related to S. viridis ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 , 3 View FIGURE 3 ). Siphonaria rodriguensis sp. nov. differs from S. sipho by COI distances of ≥ 14.9% and from S. viridis by ≥ 13.9% (Table S6). We found S. rodriguensis sp. nov. in sympatry with S. fuliginata on Rodrigues, Indian Ocean. For comparative remarks see under S. fuliginata . The shell of S. basseinensis Melvill, 1893 described from Bombay ( Fig. 14M View FIGURE 14 , not reviewed herein) is similar in having a smooth and even exterior, paired flush ribbing, but differs in having a prominent siphonal ridge.
Distribution and habitat. Recorded as endemic to Rodrigues Island, Indian Ocean ( Fig. 73 View FIGURE 73 ). In this study, found on exposed marine rocky shores, at upper and mid littoral levels ( Fig. 71R View FIGURE 71 ).
Etymology. Named after the type location of Rodrigues Island, Indian Ocean.
Melvill, J. C. & Abercrombie, A. (1893) The Marine Mollusca of Bombay. Memoirs and Proceedings of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, 4 th Series, 7, 17-51.
FIGURE 1. Maximum Likelihood phylogram based on analyses of a concatenated sequence data set of 16S and COI. Branches are collapsed at the species level. Branch labels give unit numbers and accepted species names. Numbers on branches indicate branch support employing 10,000 ultrafast bootstraps.Available genus-group names are shown next to their type species. Scale bar indicating modelled sequence divergence.
FIGURE 3. Maximum Likelihood phylogram (partial, species not collapsed). Clades J–L (laciniosa and plicata groups) of the tree shown in Fig. 1. Branch labels give specimen identifiers for new sequences or Genbank accession numbers for imported sequences from other studies and geographic regions (see Tables S1–S2 for details). Identical haplotypes are merged into single tips. Numbers on branches indicate branch support by employing 10,000 ultrafast bootstraps. Clade names give unit numbers and accepted species names. Scale bar indicating modelled sequence divergence.
FIGURE 14. Shells of S. obliquata, S. crenata, and S. basseinensis. A–D, N, Q–R. S. obliquata, A. Neotype of S. obliquata NMNZ M.331450 [M515]. B. South Island, TS, NMNZ M.331115 [M516]. C. Largest syntype of S. scutellum MNHN IM-2000-5117. D. Port Elisabeth, AM C.265378. N, Q. Animal and in situ NMNZ M.331115. R. South Island, TS, NMNZ M.331115 [M516]. E–I, P, S–T. S. crenata. E. Probable holotype MNHN IM 2000-35937. F. Pakistan, Karachi, AM C.585338 [SK153]. G. Karachi, AM C.585851 [M242]. H. Holotype of S. rosea UUZM 1577. I. Saudi Arabia, Persian Gulf, AM C.69719. P. Original figure in Savigny (1817: pl. 3, fig. 3.5). S. In situ; T. Protoconch AM C.585853 [SK302]. J–L, O. S. savignyi, J. Lectotype of S. savignyi IM 2000- 35936. K. Paralectotype MNHN IM 2000-35935. L. Paralectotype MNHN IM 2000-35934. O. Original figures in Savigny (1817: pl. 1, fig. 1.1–1.4). M. Syntype of S. basseinensis NHMUK 1893.2.16.29. Unlabelled scale bars = 10mm.
FIGURE 71. Shells of S. pravitas sp. nov., S. recurva sp. nov., S. restis sp. nov., S. rodriguensis sp. nov. and S. striata sp. nov. A–B, M–N, S. S. pravitas sp. nov. A. Holotype AM C.585040 [M192, SK118]. B. Paratype AM C.585038 [M153]. M. Sydney Harbour, in situ. N. Sydney Harbour, animal, S. Protoconch, AM C.546766 [SK432]. C. Holotype of S. recurva NMHN IM-2013- 55336 [M534]. D–H, O–P. S. restis sp. nov., WA, Kalbarri. D. Holotype WAM S74049 [M400]. E. Paratype WAM S74048 [M100]. F. Paratype AM C.585200 [M313]. G. Paratype AM C.585919 [SK150]. H. Rottnest Is, AM C.584943 [SK154]. O. Animal. P. Protoconch, AM C.585009 [SK063]. I, Q–R. S. rodriguensis sp. nov. I. Holotype AM C.585197 [SK330]. Q. Protoconch, AM C.585196 [M427]. R. In situ. J–L, T. S. striata sp. nov., Madagascar, Itampolo. J. Holotype AM C.584952 [M264]. K. Paratype AM C.584953. L. Paratype AM C.584954. T. Protoconch, paratype AM C.584953 [M265]. Scale bars = 10 mm.
FIGURE 72. Reproductive morphology of S. recurva sp. nov., S. restis sp. nov., S. rodriguensis sp. nov. and S. striata sp. nov. A. Holotype of S. recurva sp. nov. MNHN IM-2013-55336 [M534]. B–D. S. restis sp. nov. B. WA, Kalbarri, holotype WAM S74049 [M400]. C. WA, Rottnest Is, AM C.584943 [SK154]. D. WA, Point Maud, AM C.585919 [SK150]. E–F. Holotype of S. rodriguensis sp. nov. AM C.585197 [SK330]. G–H. Holotype of S. striata sp. nov. AM C.584952 [M264]. Scale bars = 1 mm.
AM |
Australian Museum |
BM |
Bristol Museum |
MG |
Museum of Zoology |
SPM |
Sabah Parks |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |