Siphonaria radiata ( Blainville, 1826 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.13.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14989236 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0D49832F-FFB8-823B-FF68-FA42FB3CFD96 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2025-03-05 09:04:49, last updated 2025-03-07 14:54:03) |
scientific name |
Siphonaria radiata ( Blainville, 1826 ) |
status |
|
Siphonaria radiata ( Blainville, 1826) View in CoL
( Figs 17A–B, U–V View FIGURE 17 , 18A–B View FIGURE 18 )
Pileopsis radiata Blainville 1826: 462 (type locality unknown).
Siphonaria radiata View in CoL — Blainville 1827a: pl. 2, figs 4, 4a (as ‘radiée’); 1827b: 294 (type locality unknown); Lamarck 1836: 556, 1839: 205; Jay 1839: 39; Catlow & Reeve 1845: 100; Hanley 1858b: 152; H. Adams & A. Adams 1855 (in 1853–58): 271; 1863: 271; Paetel 1889: 429; Morrison 1972: 52; Galindo 1977: 416; Jenkins 1982: 12, White & Dayrat 2012: 67.
Siphonaria ‘ normalis View in CoL group, unit 12’, Dayrat et al. 2014: 260, fig. 3N.
Material examined. Type material. Neotype of Pileopsis radiata , present designation, Malaysia, Port Dickson , 02°31.234’N, 101°48.026’E; coll. B.W. Jenkins, 15 Feb 2015, PD01-1 ( AM C.585861 , Fig. 17A View FIGURE 17 ). GoogleMaps
Other, non-type material. Malaysia: Bak Bak Beach, Kudat , Sabah, 07°00′ N, 116°46′ E ( AM C.585236 20p, C.595941 d [SK523]); GoogleMaps Bukit Keluang, Terengganu, 5°47.81’N, 102°36.43’E ( ZRC 1999-1978 12p; GoogleMaps ZRC. MOL.24900 p [M528, SK444], ZRC.MOL.24901 p [M596, SK528]); GoogleMaps Port Dickson, 02°31.234’N, 101°48.026’E PD01-1 ( AM C.585959 3p, C.585821 7d, C.585921 p [SK337 protoconch H2]); GoogleMaps Air Papan, Mersing, Johor, 2°30.98′ N 103°50.1’E ( ZRC 1999-1755 20p, ZRC. MOL.24895 p [M527]; ZRC.MOL.24896 p [M526]); GoogleMaps Tg. Bidara, Malacca, 02°17.568’N, 102°5.207’E ( ZRC 1999- 1746 9p; ZRC.MOL.24891 p [SK348], Fig. 17B View FIGURE 17 ; GoogleMaps ZRC. MOL.24892 p [M525], ZRC.MOL.24893 p [M595], ZRC.MOL.24894 p [M594]); GoogleMaps Pulau Langkawi, 6°18′ N, 99°52′ E ( AM C.595974 20+p, C.585098 p [SK525], C.585697 p [SK524]) GoogleMaps .
Taxonomic remarks. Blainville (1826: 462) introduced the new name Pileopsis radiata , and subsequently transferred it to Siphonaria in Blainville (1827a: pl. 2, figs 4,4a; 1827b: 294). The original type material is considered lost; no types were found in the MNHN (Philippe Bouchet, pers. comm.). The neotype is designated herein in accordance with Art. 75.3 of the Code to clarify the identity of this nominal taxon as well as to restrict its type locality. Blainville’s name is not invalidated by S. radiata Gray, 1824 , which is not an available name (for details see under S. sipho ). Siphonaria radiata ( Blainville, 1826) is a senior secondary homonym of S. radiata Sowerby I, 1835 (not reviewed herein) and S. radiata A. Adams & Reeve, 1850 , which has been replaced by S. radians H. Adams & A. Adams, 1855 . Hubendick (1946: 49) incorrectly considered S. radiata (Blainville, 1827) a synonym of S. australis .
External morphology. Foot sole grey, paler to foot edge; foot wall bluish to inner, evenly dark cream, with irregular black pigmented blotches, paler to foot, pustules prominent; cephalic folds thick, narrow, irregular black pigmentation darker over centre of cephalic folds; mantle wide thin translucent edge lobed thickened band; eye spots prominent, pneumostome small, under mantle.
Shell ( Figs 17A–B, V View FIGURE 17 ; Table S9). Small sized (max sl mean = 13.29 mm, SD = 1.55 mm, n = 42), circular ovate, height medium to tall; apex slightly curved, apex offset slightly to posterior and left, apical sides convex, posterior strongly concave, protoconch direction weakly heterostrophic to central (n = 1; Fig. 17V View FIGURE 17 ), shell whorl dextral, shell thick; growth striae prominent, even, unraised; radial colour bands indistinct; rib count (mean = 30, SD = 3.1, n = 42), primary ribs distinct from secondary ribs; ~ 16 pale brown to off white primary ribs, ridges raised, rounded; siphonal ridge formed by paired adjacent primary ribs, most primary ribs broaden weakly, project beyond shell lip (especially siphonal ridge) with ends slightly raised to scallop and corrugate shell edge; 0–2 finer secondary ribs between primary ribs, rib interstices darker. Interior shell margin and spatula dark brown to golden tan, often some calcification; off white to cream rays on shell margin align under primary/secondary ribs, extend to spatula; siphonal groove distinct, paler than margin; ADM scar indistinct, similar to margin and spatula; CMS straight; whitening and thickening of shell lip observed.
The neotype ( Fig. 17A View FIGURE 17 ). Shell (sl = 15.1, sw = 10.8, sh = 5.5 mm) circular ovate; thick, apex offset weakly offset to posterior and left, apical sides straight, 32 ribs, ~17 whitish primary ribs, with 0–2 in between secondary ribs, rib interstices dark, siphonal ridge formed by adjacent dual primary ribs. Interior evenly dark brown, white rays on shell lip under ribs.
Reproductive system ( Fig. 18A; n View FIGURE 18 = 4). Positioned within coelom under the respiratory cavity, hermaphroditic glands positioned to posterior against right foot wall and over foot sole, epiphallic parts between RAM and extending over BM; ED distinct entry to top of small GA, AO small, short, bent, tip blunt, bulbous, appears part of GA under ED; ED thick, short, centrally bent; AO, GA and ED all muscular white tissue; EG very large, elongated, 2 lobes, folded, soft white tissue; single thick elongated blunt flagellum F1 appears as extension of ED at EG join; BD and CD connect closely together into GA, both ducts smooth, short, broad, slightly bent, pass together through outer edge of RAM ( BD over CD) connecting into MG; BC medium to large, bulbous, white opaque test, embedded along with part of BD in soft white folds of MG; HD short, broad, coiled, links soft white folded AG to small yellowish granulated HG; AG larger than HG, both with outer sides curved reflecting the close positioning to curvature of inner foot wall at right posterior quarter of coelom; SV embedded in AG close to BC.
Spermatophore ( Fig. 18B View FIGURE 18 ). Broad head with short flagellum (length = 4.6 ± 0.57 mm, n = 2); head section cylindrical, bulbous, centrally bent, tip rounded; test thin, smooth, featureless, translucent encasing a white opaque central core; short looped tapering section merges head to filamentous flagellum; head slightly shorter, wider than translucent flagellum (head length = 2.28 ± 0.67 mm, n = 3; flagellum length = 2.38 mm, n = 1; length/head length ~ 52%; head width = 172 ± 17 μm; flagellum width = 26 ± 0 μm, n = 3); 5 SPMs tightly coiled in cream gelatinous mass in BC of one specimen ( Fig. 18B View FIGURE 18 ).
Comparativeremarks. Siphonariaradiata ( normalis group, unit 12) is the sister species of S. planucosta sp. nov. ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 , 4C View FIGURE 4 ). Both species are separated from each other species by distances of at least 11.5% in COI (Table S8). The lowest interspecific genetic distances were observed between S. radiata and S. madangensis sp. nov. (unit 88) = 10.7%, S. costellata sp. nov. (unit 13) = 11%, and S. normalis (unit 14) = 11.4%) (Table S8).
We found a sympatric congener in Sabah: Siphonaria kudatensis (for comparison refer to S. kudatensis ). Siphonaria radians has a lower, slightly larger shell with finer ribbing, a less prominent siphonal ridge, weaker edge scalloping, a larger AO, longer twisted ED, longer narrower BD with distal loop and a smaller BC. Shell geometry and sculpture of S. radiata resemble that of S. costellata sp. nov. (unit 13) and S. normalis (unit 14). However, S. radiata possesses slightly fewer and broader primary ribs, fewer secondary ribs, narrower interstices, more prominent siphonal ridge and more scalloped edge than these two species. The interior colouration also differs being generally paler browns to white with prominent red-brown rays extending to spatula in S. radiata . The SPM of S. radiata resembles that of S. normalis and S. gemina sp. nov. The record of ‘ S. cf kurracheensis’ in Way & Purchon (1981: 321) is a misidentification and likely of S. radiata . The specimen figured as ‘ normalis group, unit 12’ in Dayrat et al. (2014: 260, fig. 3N) corresponds well with the present species.
Distribution and habitat. Recorded from W coast of Thailand and Port Dickson, Malacca Strait, Malaysia ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 ). In this study, found on exposed and bare rocky shores, mid littoral level ( Fig. 17U View FIGURE 17 ).
Adams, A. & Reeve, L. (1850) Mollusca, Pt. III, In: Adams, A. (Ed; 1848 - 1850) The zoology of the voyage of H. M. S. Samarang, under the command of Captain Sir Edward Belcher, C. B., F. R. A. S., F. G. S., during the years 1843 - 1846. Reeve, Benham & Reeve. London. Preface and plate explanations (i - xv), pp. 45 - 87, pls 18-24. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.120176
Blainville, H. M. D. de (1826) Dictionnaire des sciences naturelles. Vol. 40. Levrault, Paris, 492 pp.
Blainville, H. M. D. de (1827 a) Manuel de malacologie et de conchyliologie. Levrault, Paris, pp. 649-664.
Catlow, A. & Reeve, L. (1845) The conchologist's nomenclator. A catalogue of all the Recent species of shells. Reeve Brothers, London, viii + 326 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.21812
Dayrat, B., Goulding, T. C. & White, T. R. (2014) Diversity of Indo-West Pacific Siphonaria (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Euthyneura). Zootaxa, 3779 (2), 246-276. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3779.2.7
Galindo, E. S. (1977) Index and register of seashells. Thomas C. Rice, Port Gamble, Washington, 524 pp.
Gray, J. E. (1824) On Gadinia, a new genus of patelloid shells. Philosophical Magazine and Journal, 63 (1), 274-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786442408644507
Hanley, S. (1858 b) On Siphonaria. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 26, 151-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1858.tb06367.x
Hubendick, B. (1946) Systematic monograph of the Patelliformia. Kunglige Svenska Ventenskapsakademiens Handlingar, Ser. 3, 23 (5), 1-92.
Jay, J. C. (1839) A catalogue of the shells, arranged according to the Lamarckian system; together with descriptions of new or rare species, contained in the collection. 3 rd edition. Wiley & Putnam, New York, 125 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4122
Lamarck, J. B. P. A de (1836) Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertebres. Tome 7. Bailliere. Paris, 736 pp. [Deuxieme edition] https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4846
Lamarck, J. B. P. A de (1839) Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertebres. Tome 13. Meline, Cans et Compagnie, Bruxelles, 764 pp. [Third edition].
Morrison, J. P. E. (1972) Mediterranean Siphonaria: West and east - old and new. Argamon, 3 (1 - 4), 51-62.
Paetel, F. (1889) Catalog der Conchylien-Sammlung. Paetel, Berlin, 505 pp.
Way, K. & Purchon, R. D. (1981) The marine shelled Mollusca of West Malaysia and Singapore. Part 2. Polyplacophora and Gastropoda. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 47 (3), 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.mollus.a065574
White, T. R. & Dayrat, B. (2012) Checklist of genus- and species-group names of false limpets Siphonaria (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Euthyneura). Zootaxa, 3538 (1), 54-78. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3538.1.2
FIGURE 1. Maximum Likelihood phylogram based on analyses of a concatenated sequence data set of 16S and COI. Branches are collapsed at the species level. Branch labels give unit numbers and accepted species names. Numbers on branches indicate branch support employing 10,000 ultrafast bootstraps.Available genus-group names are shown next to their type species. Scale bar indicating modelled sequence divergence.
FIGURE 4. Maximum Likelihood phylogram (partial, species not collapsed). Clades C–F (normalis, lateralis and pectinata groups) of the tree shown in Fig. 1. Branch labels give specimen identifiers for new sequences or Genbank accession numbers for imported sequences from other studies and geographic regions (see Tables S1–S2 for details). Identical haplotypes are merged into single tips. Numbers on branches indicate branch support by employing 10,000 ultrafast bootstraps. Clade names give unit numbers and accepted species names. Scale bar indicating modelled sequence divergence.
FIGURE 16. Known occurrence records of S. obliquata, S. radiata, S. diemenensis, S. australis, S. atra and S. denticulata
FIGURE 17. Shells of S. radiata, S. diemenensis, S. australis and S. capensis. A–B, U–V. S. radiata. A. Malaysia, Port Dickson, neotype AM C.585861 [M408]. B. Malacca, ZRC.MOL.24891 [SK348]. U. Port Dickson, in situ. V. Protoconch, AM C.585921 [SK337]. C–G, O–Q. S. diemenensis. C. Lectotype MNHN-IM-2000-35952. D. Tas, TS, AM C.584797 [SK047]. E. Tas, AM C.585270 [M107]. F. Vic, AM C.585286 [M168]. G. Tas, AM C.585260 [M170]. O. Animal. P. Tas, TS, in situ. Q. Protoconch, Vic, AM C.585357 [SK029]. H–J, R–T. S. australis. H. Lectotype MNHN-IM-2000-5036. I. NZ, Stewart Is, AM C.585249 [M481, SK288]. J. Stewart Is, AM C.585247 [M480, SK289]. K. Holotype of S. inculta USNM 5857. R–S. In situ and animal. T. Protoconch, AM C.265856 [SK511]. L–N. S. capensis. L. Lectotype MNHN IM 2000-38235. M. South Africa, MNHN-IM-2019- 1481 [M585]. N. IM-2019-1477 [M584]. Unlabelled scale bars = 10 mm.
FIGURE 18. Reproductive morphology of S. radiata, S. crenata and S. capensis. A–B. S. radiata, Malaysia, Malacca, ZRC. MOL.24891 [SK348]. C–E. S. crenata, Pakistan, Karachi, C. AM C.585851 [M242, SK233]. D. AM C.585338 [SK153]. E. AM C.595917 [M592, SK534]. F–G. S. capensis, Mozambique, Inhaca. F. MNHN IM-2019-1488 [SK507]. G. MNHN IM-2019-1481 [M585]. Unlabelled scale bars 1 mm.
AM |
Australian Museum |
BM |
Bristol Museum |
MG |
Museum of Zoology |
SPM |
Sabah Parks |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Siphonaria radiata ( Blainville, 1826 )
Jenkins, Bruce & Köhler, Frank 2024 |
Siphonaria ‘ normalis
Dayrat, B. & Goulding, T. C. & White, T. R. 2014: 260 |
Siphonaria radiata
White, T. R. & Dayrat, B. 2012: 67 |
Galindo, E. S. 1977: 416 |
Morrison, J. P. E. 1972: 52 |
Paetel, F. 1889: 429 |
Hanley, S. 1858: 152 |
Catlow, A. & Reeve, L. 1845: 100 |
Lamarck, J. B. P. 1839: 205 |
Jay, J. C. 1839: 39 |
Lamarck, J. B. P. 1836: 556 |
Pileopsis radiata
Blainville, H. M. D. de 1826: 462 |