Zygops Schoenherr, 1825: c.586
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.683.12080 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D7FD86CA-6374-480C-821B-A10C26CDDF32 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0F683A15-EA8D-544B-A25B-C6BC5B1B0BFC |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Zygops Schoenherr, 1825: c.586 |
status |
|
Zygops Schoenherr, 1825: c.586 Figs 34 View Figures 19–36 , 102 View Figures 99–102
= Eccoptus Dejean, 1821: 86 [Syn.: O’Brien and Wibmer 1984: 296]. Type species: Curculio strix Olivier, 1790 [by monotypy]. Suppressed for priority (ICZN 1987).
= Eccyptus [Fischer von Waldheim], 1829: 99. Type species: Curculio strix Olivier, 1790 [by monotypy].
Type species.
Poecilma wiedii Germar, 1824.
Gender.
Masculine.
Diagnosis.
Of the genera occuring north of South America, Zygops could be mistaken only with Peltophorus with the large, exposed pygidium that is mostly visible in dorsal view and deflecting the fifth abdominal ventrite ventrally at the apex, and the sulcate subapical constriction of the prothorax. Zygops can be differentiated from Peltophorus by the shorter metatibial setal comb (Fig. 34 View Figures 19–36 ), the much longer second funicular article (usually at least 2 times longer in Zygops , 1.5-2 times longer in Peltophorus ), the metafemora ventrally with more than one tooth (in many species), the more elongate tibial uncus (Fig. 34 View Figures 19–36 ), and the less developed mesoventrite, which in Zygops is usually flattened, but in some with the posterolateral margin tumescent (e.g. Z. maculipes Desbrochers, 1891) or with small projections (e.g. the South American Z. leucogaster Desbrochers, 1891). The prosternal channel is sometimes very narrow and scarcely depressed, and the procoxae are sometimes very narrowly separated or even contiguous (e.g. in Z. maculipes ).
Notes.
The genus Eccoptus Dejean, 1821 was suppressed despite having priority over Zygops Schoenherr, 1825 (petitioned in O’Brien and Wibmer 1986, ruled by ICZN 1987) for the purpose of nomenclatural stability: the name Eccoptus had been used much less frequently (though most recently resurrected in O’Brien and Wibmer 1982) and the name Zygops formed the base for the subfamilial name in use at the time, Zygopinae .
Keys .
Champion 1906b: 21.
Phylogenetic relationships.
See Peltophorus . Most similar to Peltophorus of the genera treated here, but the distinction between Zygops and the South American genera Parazygops and Colpothorax is less distinct, based on the shape of the rostrum and the shape of the prothorax, respectively.
Host associations.
Some species have been reared from branches of various genera of Lecythidaceae ( Fassbender 2013, Fassbender et al. 2014).
Described species.
Eighteen species are known from the focal region and an additional 34 species are known only from South America ( Wibmer and O’Brien 1986: 267).
Range.
Mexico, Guatemala, Belize, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, Dominican Republic ( Poinar and Legalov 2013, fossil); South America.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Zygops Schoenherr, 1825: c.586
Anzaldo, Salvatore S. 2017 |
Eccyptus
Fischer Waldheim 1829 |