Platypalpus
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3926.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B4D5522F-B3A7-4A78-BABE-DF977AF607AD |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5675395 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1140456E-3627-FFFF-9CA2-894392946CE6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Platypalpus |
status |
|
Key to species of Platypalpus View in CoL from Middle Asia
1 Thorax yellow, at most with dark median stripe on mesoscutum............................................... 2
- Thorax black to brown................................................................................ 6
2 (1) Two pairs of vertical setae......................................................... P. amankutanensis View in CoL sp. nov.
- One pair of vertical setae.............................................................................. 3
3 (2) Occiput black. Male: stylus white on basal half............................................................. 4
- Occiput mostly yellow. Male: stylus brown................................................................ 5
4 (3) Male: left epandrial lamella yellow, with setose outgrowth ventrally. Female: abdominal segments 8–9 contrastingly brownish...................................................................... P. kandybinae Shamshev & Grootaert View in CoL
- Male: left epandrial lamella black, without setose outgrowth ventrally. Female: abdomen yellow... P. luteoloides Grootaert View in CoL
5 (3) Apical spur on mid tibia black and sharply tipped in both sexes. Male: left epandrial lamella without process ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 25 – 27 )....................................................................................... P. sublutescens View in CoL sp. nov.
- Apical spur on mid tibia yellowish, shallowly spoon-shaped and blunt tipped in female, black and saddle-like carved apically and armed with apical spine (as in P. cothurnatus View in CoL ) in male. Male: left epandrial lamella with setose process ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 13 – 15 )............................................................................................. P. sagma View in CoL sp. nov.
6 (1) Stylus white........................................................................................ 7
- Stylus brown to black................................................................................. 8
7 (6) Mesoscutum lustrous............................................................... P. penesmirnovi View in CoL sp. nov.
- Mesoscutum microtrichose............................................................ P. pallidiseta Kovalev View in CoL
8 (7) 0–1 pair of vertical setae.............................................................................. 9
- Two pairs of vertical setae............................................................................ 25
9 (8) Mesoscutum lustrous.................................................................... Platypalpus View in CoL sp. 1.
- Mesoscutum microtrichose........................................................................... 10
10 (9) Both basal antennal segments brown to black............................................................. 11
- Both basal antennal segments yellow to brownish red...................................................... 16
11 (8) Stylus thickened, lanceolate in shape...................................................... P. ozerovi Shamshev View in CoL
- Stylus thin......................................................................................... 12
12 (11) Proepisternum without process. Anterior notopleural seta present............................. P. subinfectus View in CoL sp. nov.
- Proepisternum with polished hood-like ventral process (P. m i n u t u s -complex). Anterior notopleural seta absent......... 13
13 (12) Legs entirely black. Male: finger-like apical projection on right epandrial lamella saw-toothed.......... Platypalpus View in CoL sp. 4.
- Legs partly yellow to brownish yellow. Male: finger-like apical projection on right epandrial lamella rounded.......... 14
14 (13) Postpedicel 2.5–2.9X longer than broad, stylus 1.1–1.4X longer than postpedicel. Male: left epandrial lamella nearly straight ventrally............................................................................... Platypalpus View in CoL sp. 5.
- Postpedicel shorter and stylus longer. Male: left epandrial lamella either with indentation in middle and setose outgrowth or its ventral margin forming angled line..................................................................... 15
15 (14) Male: left cercus extremely long and narrow.................................................. Platypalpus View in CoL sp. 6.
- Male: left cercus short, triangular in lateral view............................................... Platypalpus View in CoL sp. 7.
16 (10) Anterior notopleural seta present (if acrostichals closely biserial and strongly divergent, compare P. kirtlingensis View in CoL )....... 17
- Anterior notopleural seta absent........................................................................ 18
17 (16) Postpedicel yellowish in basal part (in dorsal view). Dorsocentrals biserial and as long and strong as acrostichals. Male: left cercus with lustrous hook at apex..................................................... P. longiseta (Zetterstedt) View in CoL
- Postpedicel black. Dorsocentrals nearly uniserial and at least some of them distinctly longer and more bristle-like than corre- sponding acrostichals. Male: left cercus without hook ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 36 – 38 )............................ P. zeravshanensis View in CoL sp. nov.
18 (16) Acrostichal setae very closely biserial (almost uniserial) and strongly divergent................ P. kirtlingensis Grootaert View in CoL
- Acrostichal setae broadly biserial and not strongly divergent................................................. 19
19 (16) Katepisternum entirely microtrichose. Tarsi yellow except contrastingly black last tarsal segment................... 20
- Katepisternum at least with lustrous spot. Tarsi various..................................................... 21
20 (19) Postpedicel 2.3X longer than broad. Stylus thickened. Mid tibia with very short blunt apical spur..... P. niyazovi Shamshev View in CoL
- Postpedicel 1.5–1.7X longer than broad. Stylus thin. Mid tibia with long and pointed apical spur...................................................................................................... P. samarkandensis View in CoL sp. nov.
21 (19) Postpedicel yellow with blackish tip. Mesoscutum with two dark stripes between rows of setae. Abdomen with grey fasciae on all terga, broad in male and narrow in female................................................ P. virgatus View in CoL sp. nov.
- Not as above....................................................................................... 22
22 (21) Stylus greatly thickened. Small spur on mid tibia.......................................................... 23
- Stylus thin. Long, sharply pointed spur on mid tibia........................................................ 24
23 (22) Palpus short (1/3rd as long as proboscis), dark. Clypeus microtrichose. Male: left epandrial lamella with finger-like apical pro- jection ( Fig 30 View FIGURES 28 – 30 )..................................................................... P. tumidiarista View in CoL sp. nov.
- Palpus long (2/3rds as long as proboscis), yellow. Clypeus partly lustrous. Male: left epandrial lamella without finger-like api-
cal projection..................................................................... P. farabiensis Shamshev View in CoL 24 (22) Legs entirely yellow including apical tarsal segments. Mesoscutum densely golden-yellow microtrichose. Male: left cercus without long spine-like process at apex...................................................... Platypalpus View in CoL sp. 2.
- At least apical tarsal segment darkened. Mesoscutum light grey microtrichose. Male: left cercus with long spine-like process at apex ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 31 – 33 ).................................................................... P. uzbekistanicus View in CoL sp. nov.
25 (8) Mesoscutum at least partly lustrous, devoid of microtrichia.................................................. 26
- Mesoscutum entirely microtrichose..................................................................... 27
26 (25) Posteroventral setae on mid femur absent. Mid tibial spur nearly absent. Katepisternum largely lustrous (up to posterior margin)........................................................................ P. commutatoides sp. nov.
- Posteroventral setae on mid femur present. Mid tibial spur rather long, pale and blunt-tipped. Katepisternum with very small lustrous patch in middle (♀ only)........................................................... Platypalpus View in CoL sp. 3.
27 (25) Apical spur on hind tibia absent. Posteroventral setae on mid femur absent. Acrostichals biserial. Postpedicel 2– 3 X longer than broad; stylus as long as postpedicel; basal two segments reddish yellow. Legs entirely yellow including last tarsomere. All body setae pale....................................................................... P. spatenkai View in CoL sp. nov.
- Apical spur on hind tibia present. Posteroventral setae on mid femur present. Other characters different................ 28
28 (27) Katepisternum entirely microtrichose or with indefinite sublustrous patch in middle. Both basal antennomeres and basal third of postpedicel yellow, otherwise brownish black. Legs entirely yellow including last tarsomere. Spur on mid tibia rather short and blunt......................................................................... P. chimganensis View in CoL sp. nov.
- Katepisternum largely lustrous. Antennae black. Legs extensively darkened. Spur on mid tibia rather long and sharp-tipped (species status cannot be resolved without associated males)...................................... Platypalpus View in CoL sp. 8.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.