Phthiracarus nitens

van der Hammen, L., 1964, The Oribatid Family Phthiracaridae III. Redescription of Phthiracarus nitens (Nicolet), Acarologia 6, pp. 400-411 : 400-410

publication ID

ORI10560

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6285108

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/14D6116B-1EBD-F43F-D4B3-852910D18A88

treatment provided by

Thomas

scientific name

Phthiracarus nitens
status

 

[Redescription of Phthiracarus nitens View in CoL (Nicolet)]

Nicolet described three species of Phthiracaroid mites, which are named by him Hoplophora magna , Hoplophora stricula Koch, and Hoplophora nitens . H. magna and nitens are characterized as common, respectively very common in all woods of the surroundings of Paris; stricula is characterized as occurring rather rarely in the Bois de Satory.

Hoplophora magna is now classified with Steganacarus ; the identity is certain, although its relation to S. anomalus is a problem that must still be thoroughly studied. Hoplophora stricula sensu Nicolet is a Rhysotritia which is probably identical with duplicata , the commonest species near Paris of the genus; I remark that this is mentioned already by Grandjean (1953, p. 158) 1). Hoplophora nitens is undoubtedly a Phthiracarus because of the smooth and shining notogaster; its identity will be the subject of the present paper.

1). Oudemans (1915, p. 233) created the name Phthiracarus undatus for the nymph of Hoplophora stricula sensu Nicolet (1855, p. 399, pl. 2, hg. 2). The name could be a senior homonym of Rhysotritia duplicata if there is sufficient proof of the identity of this nymph; for the moment this appears to be doubtful.

In order to identify nitens it is essential to know the Phthiracaroid fauna of the woods near Paris. As a result of my trips I collected the following material: 220 Rhysotritia (mostly duplicata , but also ardua and minima ), 454 Steganacarus (mainly magnus ), and 580 Phthiracarus (belonging to five species). In the following list the Phthiracarus species are enumerated with the total number of specimens and the frequency (i.e. the number of samples in which they have been collected). Anticipating the conclusions drawn below, the name nitens is given in this list to the commonest species. The name P. globosus (C. L. Koch) is given to a characteristic, dark-coloured, and globular species of which the identity is certain since topotypic specimens have been collected by me in the surroundings of Regensburg (Bavaria, Germany). Because of the lack of sufficient descriptions, the remaining three species are named here PA PB, and PC respcctively. I remark that PA is a small species related to ferrugineus sensu Jacot; PB is a species with a falcate sensillus, related to testudineus sensu Jacot; PC is a species with striklingly long notogastral setae, related to crinitus sensu Jacot. Consequently, the real nitens must be chosen out of the following species.

P. globosus does not correspond with Nicolet's description and figure of nitens because of its very dark colour, the nearly globular shape of the notogaster, and the long notogastral setae. P. spec. PA is at once excluded because of its small length; P. spec. PC because of its strikingly long notogastral setae. The real nitens must finally be chosen from the remaining two species, those preliminarily named nitens and spec. PB. The first of these is the most common one that has been found in all woods investigated by me. P. spec. PB is much more rare (only present in 6 samples) and has been found in damp places only; the total number is flattered because 98 specimens of spec. PB have been collected in two samples from an alder marsh near a brooklet ( Rû de Gally). I recall that Nicolet characterizes nitens as very common in all woods of the surroundings of Paris. Apart from this, P. spec. PB is only of medium length, whilst it has a long falcate sensillus, characters that do not exactly fit in with Nicolet's description and figure. In my opinion there is sufficient evidence to regard the common species indeed as the real nitens .

In literature the name nitens is sometimes mentioned as a synonym of other spccies. Claparède (1868) lists it under contractilis Perty, Michael (1888, 1898) under dasypus Dugès, Willmann (1931) under piger Scopoli. It is probable that in recent times the common species has offen been cited under the last-mentioned name. Notes by Strenzke (1952, p. 154) on the identification of Swedish specimens as P. piger point in this directum; it is, however, not certain that Strenzke's German material belongs to nitens because he characterizes these specimens as dark-coloured.

I remark that Scopoli's original 1763 description of Acarus piger (a concise Latin diagnosis) is just sufficient to recognize the animal as a Phthiracaroid mite; its recorded occurrence on lichen in Tirol definitively excludes the possibility that it is identical with P. nitens . Oribates dasypus Dugès (1834) 1) is a Phthiracarus from " Ardennes ", a department in the North of France, near the Belgian frontier; the locality is imprecize so that a study of topotypic specimens will not be helpful to solve the problem of its identity. The important identity of Phthiracarus contractilis Perty will be the subjeet of a following number of the present series.

1). It is unknown whother this is the same species as represented by Duges and Edwards (1848) as Oribata decumana ; the figures of the last-mentioned species have some resemblance to P. nitens .

My list of localities of P. nitens must be regarded as the first certain series of records since Nicolet's original description. In the redescription comparisons are made with P. laevigatus (cf. van der Hammen, 1963), a closely related spccies with which P. nitens has probably been confounded.

I remark that similar difficulties as in laevigatus can be met with when the animal is heated with lactic acid. The use of diluted lactic acid (two parts of lactic acid and one part of distilled water) is preferable.

Phthiracarus nitens (Nicolet, 1855)

Hoplophora nitens Nicolet, 1855, p. 472, pl. 10 fig. 6.

Material. - The topotypic material from the surroundings of Paris (France) dealt with here, comprises the following specimens (localities arranged mainly from west to east.).

Parc de Versailles, litter from woods near " Grand Canal " , June 15, 1960: 25 specimens (sample 60 P 28). GoogleMaps Idem, litter from " Petit Parc " , September 16, 1961: 2 specimens (61 P 58). GoogleMaps Idem, litter from large heap of leaf-mould in " Petit Parc " , September 16, 1961: 7 specimens (61 P 59). GoogleMaps Idem, moss, mainly collected in alder-marsh near Ru de Gally , November 22, 1961: 12 specimens (61 P 74), 67 specimens (61 P 75), 4 specimens (61 P 76). GoogleMaps

Bois de Satory, near Versailles, litter from dry part with scattered trees , September 12, 1961: 2 specimens (61 P 52). GoogleMaps Idem, moss from forest floor , September 16, 1961: 35 specimens (61 P 60). GoogleMaps Idem, litter from ravine , September 16, 1961: 6 specimens (61 P 61). GoogleMaps Idem, litter from higher part , November 21, 1961: 2 specimens (61 P 71), 3 specimens (61 P 72), 1 specimen (61 P 73). GoogleMaps

Bois du Cerf Volant 1) near Versailles, mainly litter , April 5, 1960: 3 specimens (60 P 1), 6 specimens (60 P 2), 11 specimens (60 P 3), 5 specimens (60 P 4). GoogleMaps Idem, litter , June 15, 1960: 9 specimens (60 P 25), 16 specimens (60 P 27). GoogleMaps

1). I discovered this name on a local map. The woods are a continuation of the Bois de Satory.

Bois de Fausse Repose, between Ville d'Avray and Chaville, litter , June 18, 1960: 9 specimens (60 P 40). GoogleMaps

Parc de St. Cloud, litter , June 18, 1960: 22 specimens (60 P 35), 59 specimens (60 P 36). GoogleMaps

Viroflay, litter from the woods , September 19, 1961: 2 specimens (61 P 68). GoogleMaps

Bois de Meudon, litter and moss from the northern part of the woods near Sevres , June 14, 1960: 1 specimen (60 P 24). GoogleMaps Idem, litter from the western part of the woods near Chaville , June 14, 1960: 9 specimens (60 P 21). GoogleMaps Idem, moss from the same part of the woods , June 14, 1960: 2 specimens (60 P 23). GoogleMaps Idem, moss from the woods between Chaville and Velizy-Villacoublay , September 17, 1961: 2 specimens (61 P 62). GoogleMaps Idem, litter from the south-eastern part near Meudon , September 23, 1960: 9 specimens (60 P 41). GoogleMaps

Le Plessis-Robinson, litter from the woods north of the terrace , September 18, 1961: 4 specimens (61 P 64). GoogleMaps

Parc de Sceaux, litter , June 16, 1960: 31 specimens (60 P 29), 2 specimens (60 P 30), 5 specimens (60 P 31), 2 specimens (60 P 32). GoogleMaps

Bois de Vincennes, litter from the woods south-east of the Castle , June 17, 1960: 10 specimens (60 P 24), 7 specimens (60 P 34). GoogleMaps

Total: 392 specimens from 34 samples.

Because the type-material of Nicolet's Oribatid mites is no more in existence, a specimen from sample 61 P 60 is designated here as neo-type of Hoplophora nitens Nicolet; it is preserved in the collection of the Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden.

Occurrence. - In the surroundings of Paris the species is common in litter and moss in woods. It has apparently no special humidity preference because it is found in dry as well as in damp parts. It occurs in both the higher and the lower part of the woods.

Measurements. - 35 specimens from sample 61 R 60 have been measured. The results of males and females together are the following: length of prodorsum 0.300-0.435 mm; length of notogaster 0.530-0.885; height of notogaster 0.390-0.620. When ovipositor and penis are not extended it is offen difficult to establish the sex. The average length of the notogaster of the male is apparently between 0.550 and 0.620 mm, that of the female between 0.745 and 0.805.

Habitus and colour. - The species is a relatively large Phthiracarus , although somewhat smaller than P. laevigatus . In comparison with laevigatus the shape of the notogaster is more elongate, without sharp angle near c1. The notogastral hairs are thin but distinct, and of medium length; they are whitish and offen broken. The cuticle is very shining; on a carbon block only a vague irregular punctation can be discovered. The long solenidions psi of the tibiae are conspicuous, as drawn by Nicolet. The anterior apophysis of the genital valves is easily visible in a dry observation.

The colour is always more or less yellow, ochreous, or yellowish-brown; recently moulted specimens are rather light, older specimens darker. The notogastral limb and the borders of anal and genital valves are generally distinctly darker than the remaining part of the idiosoma.

Cerotegument. - When the animal is studied on a carbon block, irregular granules of white cerotegument can be observed on the prodorsum (especially in the anterior region), on the notogastral limb, and in the ano-genital region. In older specimens small irregular masses of cerotegument can also be present on the sides of the notogaster.

Cuticle. - In transparent light the cuticle appears to be hnely and densely punctate. The punctation of the lateral border of the prodorsum and of the border of the notogastral limb can be less distinct. In some of my specimens heating with lactic acid caused a nearly complete separation of epiostracum and ectostracum in the region of the opisthosoma.

Prodorsum (fig. 2 A). - The aspis presents the usual pair of anterior concavities. The lateral ridge is rather thin; it is slightly curved above the bothridium. Bothridium and sensillus are represented in ng. 2 B; the sensillus resembles that of Phthiracarus laevigatus . The prodorsal setae are very thin; they are lying close to the surface of the aspis. The interlamellar setae (il) are markedly longer than the lamellar setae (le). The rostral setae have a long canal.

Notogaster (fig. 1). - The notogaster is rather elongate and much less arched than in P. laevigatus ; the outline presents no pronounced angle near c1. The notogastral setae are of medium length, distinctly longer than in P. laevigatus . The disposition of the setae is shown in fig. 1. There are four pairs of lyrifissures (ia, im, ip, ips), two pairs of vestiges of setae (f1: f2) and the usual mark µ of a muscle (this muscle is indicated on fig. 5 as m1).

Lateral region of the podosoma. - In fig. 3 I have represented a lateral view of the podosoma of a specimen that is not completely opened; parts of aspis, notogaster, and genital valve are also drawn. The main muscles that serve for opening and closing are indicated with m1-4. Muscle m1, is attached at the lateral mark µ on the inside of the notogaster (cf. fig. 1); m2 is a large muscle attached at a reinforced point of the lateral border of the aspis; m3 and m4 are attached in the posterior part of the aspis.

The coxal regions are slightly scleritized, but the lateral part of the podosoma mainly consists of weak skin. The supracoxal seta e1 is relatively long and easily visible; I remark that I did not notice it in P. laevigatus (although present). The setae of the trochanteres, and the epimeral seta 3 a, easily visible in lateral view, are also represented in fig. 3.

Ano-genital region (fig. 4 A, B). - The genital valves present a distinct anterior apophysis as in P. laevigatus . There are 4+5 genital setae and 1 aggenital, the usual numbers for Phthiracaridae .

The anterior anal lock is right-fitting (cf. van der Hammen, 1963, p. 712). The adanal setae ad1 and ad2 are vestigial; ad3 is curved backward. Among 35 specimens from sample 61 P 60 investigated by me, I discovered two vertitions: in one case ad1 appeared to be present as a normal seta at the left side; in another case ad1 as well as ad2 appeared to be present at both sides.

I have found no specimens with extended ovipositor. I succeeded, however, in establishing the number of genital papillae (cf. fig. 5 A, B). There are three pairs, of which the anterior pair is reduced. I do not know if this number is present in all cases. The anterior pair is difficult to observe; in order to study it with certainty, it is necessary to separate the papillae from the opisthosoma. My figures have been prepared after a removed set; they clearly show the relation in size between the papillae.

Palp (fig. 2 C). - The palp closely resembles that of P. laevigatus . The formula is 2-2-7. The solenidion omega is free. The tarsus has three distinct eupathidia (acm, ul"', and ul'). I have figured the tarsus because the position of the tooth at the base of ul' suggests that this is indeed the remainder of the subultimal seta (su) which has joined ul'.

Legs. - The numbers of setae on the legs correspond with those of P. laevigatus ; d of tibiae I-IV, and l' of genu I (which are associated with solenidions) are strongly reduced. The formulae are the following.

Setae: I (1-4-2-5-16-1); II (1-3-2-3-12-1); III (2-2-1-2-10-1); IV (2-1-1-2-10-1).

Solenidions: I (2-1-3); II (1-1-2); III (1-1-0); IV (0-1-0).

I have now definitively solved the problem of the notation of the tarsal setae. We start from the fact that (tc), (p), (u), s, and (a) are cmied in the terminal part, unless they are eupathidia (on tarsus I (it), (p), (u), s, and a are eupathidia), whilst (ft) and (pv) are straight. It now appears that tarsi I and II both have two fastigials (ft) and two primiventrals (pv). On tarsus II the fastigial seta ft' has a rather lateral position; a II is absent. In my figure of tarsus II of P. laevigatus (van der Hammen, 1963, fig. 5 D) the notation a' must consequently be corrected into pv'.

The setae on tarsi III and IV have developed positions that rather strongly deviate from the original paired ones. I have prepared figures of dorsal views of these tarsi in order to clarify the homology; they can be studied in addition to my figures of lateral views of tarsi III and IV of P. laevigatus (cf. van der Hammen, 1963, fig. 6 C, D). It appears that on tarsi III and IV tc' is inserted obliquely behind tc". Most setae have slightly moved according to a direction that is upward on the antiaxial side, inward on the upperside, downward on the paraxial side, and outward on the ventral side. Tarsus III has a pair of fastigials (ft) and one primiventral (pv'), whilst tarsus IV has one fastigial (ft") and a pair of primiventrals (pv); on both tarsi the antelaterals (a) are absent. In my figures of tarsi III and IV of P. laevigatus (cf. van der Hammen, 1963, fig. 6 C, D), the notation a must consequently be corrected into pv'.

It appears that especially the antelareral setae (a) are reduced in P. nitens and P. laevigatus . On tarsus I (a) is present, but a' is an eupathidium with a ventral position (if this ventral eupathidium is a' indeed). On tarsus II a" only is present; a' as well as a " are absent on tarsi III and IV.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF