Lechriopini Lacordaire, 1865: 149
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.683.12080 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D7FD86CA-6374-480C-821B-A10C26CDDF32 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/15D8FCAC-64E5-4D00-4754-8907F1DE52F3 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Lechriopini Lacordaire, 1865: 149 |
status |
|
Lechriopini Lacordaire, 1865: 149
Classificatory history and current circumscription.
This tribe was originally characterized by Lacordaire (1865: 149) for the genus Lechriops by the rostral channel, which is closed (horseshoe-shaped) posteriorly to receive the rostrum and the linear, carinate femora that may or may not exceed the apex of the abdomen.
While a subclassification for the Lechriopini is not formally proposed here without also examining the South American genera, the following groups of genera are hypothesized to be related: the " Eulechriops genus complex", including Eulechriops , Macrolechriops Champion, 1906, Copturomorpha Champion, 1906, Cylindrocopturinus Sleeper, 1963, Coturpus R.S. Anderson, 1994, and Turcopus R.S. Anderson, 1994 and the " Macrocopturus genus complex", including Macrocopturus , Copturomimus Heller, 1895, Lechriops , Pseudolechriops , Hoplocopturus Heller, 1895, and Mnemynurus Heller, 1895. The genera Microzygops , Paramnemyne , Poecilogaster , Euzurus , Copturus , Microzurus and Psomus do not fit into either complex as currently conceived. Until the inclusion of the South American lechriopine genera a subtribal classification for the Lechriopini will not be further speculated here.
Variation in key character systems.
Among the genera currently placed in the tribe (sensu Lyal et al. 2006), the only characters that distinguish them (after the exclusion of Acoptus , Philinna , and Philides ) are a concealed pygidium with rapidly ascending abdominal sclerites, the presence of modification to the mesoventrite and/or the presence of sclerolepidia (just sclerolepidia in Copturomimus , most Macrocopturus and Psomus ). The mesepipleura are usually large and somewhat ascending (except in Paramnemyne and Psomus ). Other characters given by Lyal et al. (2006: 229) that separate lechriopines from zygopines are: "larger eyes, extending half-way or more down the side of the head; a longer rostrum, reaching at least the middle coxae; the middle and hind femora with the posterior distal margin extended into an acuminate projection extending beyond the anterior distal margin", but these appear to be homoplastic - many lechriopines, especially some Eulechriops and related genera, have smaller eyes like many zygopines, and many zygopines have a similar femoral apex. The presence of a carina and ventral tooth on the hind femora, and the relative lengths of the first two funicular articles are potentially indicative of infratribal relationships; in the Eulechriops genus complex the hind femora are not carinate and unarmed ventrally and the second funicular article is at most subequal to the first, while in the Macrocopturus genus complex the hind femora are ventrally toothed and carinate and the second funicular article is longer than the first.
Modification to the meso- and metaventrite to receive the rostrum varies quite a bit in this group, with the typical forms (i.e. deviating the least from Lacordaire’s original tribal construction of a closed, horseshoe-shaped channel), being found in most members of the following genera: Lechriops , Poecilogaster , Eulechriops , Macrolechriops , Copturomorpha , Coturpus , Turcopus , Copturus , Microzurus , Euzurus , Microzygops and Pseudolechriops . These genera likely do not represent a monophyletic group, and the mode of closure (whether a simple depression or a strongly carinate apex of the channel) and the location of closure (on the mesoventrite or metaventrite) can vary significantly within genera. Pseudolechriops has arcuate lateral margins of the channel forming an ovoid carina that encircles a deep excavation on the mesoventrite and the anterior margin of the metaventrite (Fig. 13 View Figures 10–18 ). A few species of the genus Macrocopturus (e.g. M. albidus Champion, 1906) and the genus Microzygops have a similarly constructed mesoventrite (Fig. 11 View Figures 10–18 ) but the majority of Macrocopturus species and the very similar Copturomimus species have the unmodified "zygopine type" of mesoventrite. The mesoventrites of the genera Hoplocopturus and Mnemynurus are interpreted as of the lechriopine type, with the sides of the channel strongly arcuate and meeting medially, forming an inverted U-shaped carina that no longer appears to serve the function of receiving the rostrum (Fig. 9 View Figures 1–9 ). Paramnemyne , Euzurus , Copturus , and Microzurus have a mesoventrite that would be classified here as the piazurine type ( Heller 1895: 5 also notes the resemblance), with the rostral channel on the mesoventrite open (in Paramnemyne and Euzurus , Figs 8 View Figures 1–9 , 12 View Figures 10–18 ) or closed (in Copturus and Microzurus , Fig. 6 View Figures 1–9 ) and without anteriorly extending carinae; at least the latter three genera likely belong in the Lechriopini considering other characters. The mesoventrite of Psomus is unmodified.
Diversity and distribution.
Two hundred and forty-two species are currently known from north of South America in nineteen genera, comprising nearly half of the genus- and the majority of the species-level diversity of North and Central American Conoderinae . An additional eight genera are known only from South America.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.