Holophris Mocsáry, 1890
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4963.2.10 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0A1C4DCD-25B0-4A51-B423-F0AD6AE2AE7A |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4700764 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/162487B7-7134-FFE0-FF35-FD54E3B6FB6C |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Holophris Mocsáry, 1890 |
| status |
|
Genus Holophris Mocsáry, 1890
Holophris Mocsáry, 1890: 51 (as subgenus of Elampus Spinola, 1806 ). Type species: Ellampus (Holophris) marginellus Mocsáry, 1890 , by monotypy.
Holophris Mocsáry : Ashmead 1902: 229; Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 222 (part.); Strumia 1995: 53; Rosa 2005: 8; Madl & Rosa 2012: 103 View Cited Treatment (part.).
Omalus (Holophris) Panzer, 1801 : Linsenmaier 1959: 14 (part.).
Diagnosis. According to Rosa et al. (2016), Holophris Mocsáryis closely related to Omalus Panzer, 1801 , Philoctetes , Pseudomalus Ashmead, 1902 , and Leptopareia , but it can be differentiated from the latter four genera by the following characters: transpleural carina extending below propodeal angle; head, in frontal view, with distinct convex upper profile, in lateral view, with distinct subgenal area; double omaulus triangularly shaped.
Remarks. The feminine gender of the genus name was indicated by Rosa et al. 2016; previous authors supposed it was masculine.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
Holophris Mocsáry, 1890
| Nguyen, Lien Thi Phuong & Wiśniowski, Bogdan 2021 |
Holophris Mocsáry
| Madl, M. & Rosa, P. 2012: 103 |
| Rosa, P. 2005: 8 |
| Strumia, F. 1995: 53 |
| Kimsey, L. S. & Bohart, R. M. 1991: 222 |
| Ashmead, W. H. 1902: 229 |
Holophris Mocsáry, 1890: 51
| Mocsary, A. 1890: 51 |