Leptanilloides copalinga Delsinne & Donoso, 2015

Delsinne, Thibaut, Sonet, Gontran & Donoso, David A., 2015, Two new species of Leptanilloides Mann, 1823 (Formicidae: Dorylinae) from the Andes of southern Ecuador, European Journal of Taxonomy 143, pp. 1-35 : 8-12

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2015.143

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CA2B7F29-C4C3-4BCC-A65B-40733C856652

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3793999

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4324B13A-500B-464C-AE3F-62BCAF95A2CC

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:4324B13A-500B-464C-AE3F-62BCAF95A2CC

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Leptanilloides copalinga Delsinne & Donoso
status

sp. nov.

Leptanilloides copalinga Delsinne & Donoso sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:4324B13A-500B-464C-AE3F-62BCAF95A2CC

Figs 2 View Fig A–F, 3A–F

Diagnosis

Leptanilloides copalinga sp. nov. belongs to the L. biconstricta species-group. It can be distinguished from other species of this group by the combination of the following characters: masticatory margin of mandible feebly dentate, with teeth extremely minute, blunt and irregularly shaped ( Fig. 3A View Fig ); lateroclypeal tooth present (difficult to observe in stereo microscopy even at high magnification due to the small size of the species but obvious in SEM; Fig 3A View Fig ); head with piligerous foveolae separated by smooth interspaces equaling 2–3 diameters; reticulation on mesopleuron, metapleuron and lateral side of petiole superficial and interrupted; flange over metapleural gland opening conspicuous and sharply pointed posteriorly, resulting in a projection which surpasses propodeum declivity margin in lateral view ( Fig. 3B View Fig ); petiole slender in dorsal view, 52 ≤ PI ≤ 63 ( Fig. 3D View Fig ); and subpetiolar process straight (not distinctly bulging), with a rounded projection anteriorly ( Fig. 3C View Fig ).

Etymology

Name in apposition which refers to the Copalinga Private Reserve, the type locality, in honour of its owners Catherine Vits and Boudewijn de Roover to acknowledge their efforts for the conservation of Ecuadorian biodiversity.

Type material

Holotype

ECUADOR: Worker, Zamora-Chinchipe Prov., Copalinga Private Reserve , 1510 m, 4°4’56.6” S, 78°58’5.71” W, 2 Apr. 2010, soil sample, coll. Thibaut Delsinne and Tania Milena Arias-Penna (QCAZ, sc 4006304).

GoogleMaps

Paratypes

ECUADOR: Same data as holotype: 1 worker, gold-coated for SEM (RBINS, sc 4006301); 1 pinned (MUTPL, sc 4006303); 1 worker, 96% ethanol (RBINS, sc 4006302, specimen with DNA data). GenBank accession number: KT601697 View Materials .

Measurements (in mm) and indices

Holotype (paratype 4006303): HW 0.33 (0.34), HL 0.44 (0.44), SL 0.23 (0.21), PrW 0.2 (0.22), WL 0.56 (0.57), MH 0.17 (0.17), PL 0.17 (0.18), PW 0.09 (0.11), PPL 0.16 (0.18), PPW 0.16 (0.18), AivL 0.26 (0.26), AivW 0.3 (0.33), FFeL 0.23 (0.27), FFeW 0.09 (0.11), HFeL 0.29 (0.29), HTL 0.3 (0.29), CI 75 (76.25), SI 70 (60.66), PI 51.61 (62.5), MI 30 (30.39).

Description

Worker

With the characters typical of the genus (see diagnosis and description in Brandão et al. 1999 and Borowiec & Longino 2011) and of the L. biconstricta species-group (see diagnosis of the group above). Other characters or differences are as follows:

HEAD. Elongate and rectangular with lateral margin nearly straight and parallel. Posterior corner rounded. Posterior margin modestly convex, almost straight. Parafrontal ridge absent. Clypeal lamella strongly convex ( Fig. 3A View Fig ). Basal and masticatory margins of mandible dentate but teeth extremely minute, blunt and irregularly shaped, difficult to discern even under magnifications of about 100× ( Fig. 3A View Fig ). Basal and masticatory margins united by a broad convexity. Basal margin faintly crenulate. Labial and maxillary palps difficult to discern in situ but formula apparently 2,2. Hypostomal anterior border without distinct tooth. Scape when laid back failing to reach medial distance to posterior margin of head by nearly one maximum diameter.

MESOSOMA. Flange over metapleural gland opening conspicuous and sharply pointed posteriorly, forming a projection which surpasses propodeum declivity margin ( Fig. 3B View Fig ). Femur not conspicuously enlarged, relatively slender. Midtibia with one short (i.e., half size of foretibia strigil), pectinate spur ( Fig. 3F View Fig ), although pectination may be difficult to observe even at high magnification. Hindtibia with one broadly pectinate spur roughly as long as strigil. Metatibial gland absent or very reduced and not visible even in SEM.

METASOMA. Long and relatively slender. In dorsal view, petiole rectangular with lateral margin slightly convex, twice as long as wide ( Fig. 3D View Fig ), and as long as abdominal segment III (postpetiole). Anterior face concave, posterior face straight. In lateral view, petiole height approximately ¼ smaller than height of abdominal segment III. Petiolar tergite dome-shaped, with short anterior and posterior faces, maximum height situated in posterior half. Short tubulated portion present posteriorly. Petiolar spiracle inconspicuous, not in excavation, set near anterior rim of tergite, similar in form and slightly smaller in diameter than propodeal spiracle. Subpetiolar process with ventral margin straight to slightly concave, not distinctly bulging, anteriorly forming rounded projection ( Fig. 3C View Fig ). Maximum height of petiolar sternite situated medially. In dorsal view, abdominal segment III (postpetiole) trapezoid, with straight, parallel anterior and posterior faces. Posterior face twice as long as anterior face. In lateral view, tergite evenly convex, without well-differentiated posterior face. Sternite evenly rounded. In dorsal view, abdominal segments IV–VI subequal in length.

PILOSITY AND SCULPTURE. Mandible smooth and shiny, with few, scattered piligerous punctures. Head with abundant deep piligerous foveolae and smooth interspaces on average equaling two or three puncture diameters. Mesosoma and abdomen more finely and sparsely punctate. Fine reticulate sculpture present laterally on lower pronotum, mesopleuron, propodeum and petiole. Dorsal part of pronotum, mesopleuron, propodeum and petiole smooth and shiny. Body and appendages with abundant, short and subdecumbent to suberect hairs. Body color yellow to reddish ( Fig. 2 View Fig ), with head and mesosoma darker than petiole and gaster. Legs and antennae yellowish.

Gyne

Unknown.

Male

Unknown.

Distribution

Only known from the type locality.

Biology

Unknown. The type series was found by visual search in a 15×15× 15 cm soil core inspected for ants during 20 person-minutes (the soil content was examined over a white plastic board using a headlamp to facilitate ant detection), which suggests subterranean habits as observed in other Leptanilloides species. The habitat is a relatively well-preserved evergreen lower montane forest. Soil texture is clay loam; proportion of sand, silt and clay is 44%, 22%, and 35%, respectively; mean pH = 4 ± 0.2 SD (n = 24 soil samples).

Remarks

This species belongs to the L. biconstricta species-group. The most similar species are L. biconstricta and L. atlantica , which also possess a long and sharply pointed flange over the metapleural gland opening and a straight (not bulging) petiolar sternite with a rounded anterior projection. However, these two species have a deeper constriction between the postpetiole and abdominal segment IV. Besides, L. copalinga sp. nov. has a petiole roughly as long as the postpetiole (longer in L. biconstricta ) and its postpetiolar sternite is evenly rounded (distinctly bulging anteriorly in L. biconstricta ). Finally, L. copalinga sp. nov. is larger than L. atlantica ( Fig. 1 View Fig ). The other species of the L. biconstricta speciesgroup are easily distinguished from L. copalinga sp. nov. by, among other characters, the shape of their petiolar sternite (bulging medially in L. gracilis and L. femoralis ; bulging anteriorly in L. erinys ), the shape of the flange over the metapleural gland opening (short and rounded posteriorly in L. improvisa and L. prometea ), the head sculpture (more densely foveolate in L. sculpturata ) and the lateroclypeal tooth (absent in L. caracola ).

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF