Troglohnia qiubei Lin & Li, 2023
|
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1187.112936 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A09B6A51-1026-4375-A4EA-0EFC676479F1 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/ECD0EC6E-BD4B-41F3-931F-A49F6E2F589F |
|
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:ECD0EC6E-BD4B-41F3-931F-A49F6E2F589F |
|
treatment provided by |
|
|
scientific name |
Troglohnia qiubei Lin & Li |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Troglohnia qiubei Lin & Li sp. nov.
Figs 1C View Figure 1 , 2B View Figure 2 , 3C View Figure 3 , 12A, B View Figure 12 , 13A, B View Figure 13 , 17B View Figure 17 , 18B View Figure 18 , 19B View Figure 19 , 20C, D View Figure 20 , 30 View Figure 30
Type material.
Holotype: ♂ (IZCAS-Ar44672), China, Yunnan: Wenshan Zhuang and Miao Autonomous Pref., Qiubei County, Shuanglongying Town, Puzhehei Villiage, Dongjiadashi Cave, 24.1422°N, 104.0990°E, ca 1455 m, 19.VIII.2010, Z. Yao, X. Wang and C. Wu leg. Paratypes: 5♂ 5♀ (IZCAS-Ar44673-Ar44682), same data as holotype.
Diagnosis.
Troglohnia qiubei sp. nov. can be distinguished from T. wuding sp. nov. by the male ventral retrolateral tibial apophysis almost straight and as wide as dorsal retrolateral tibial apophysis (Fig. 12B View Figure 12 ) [vs strongly curved and wider than dorsal retrolateral tibial apophysis (Fig. 15B View Figure 15 )], embolic tooth terminal flat (Fig. 12A View Figure 12 ) [vs terminal finger-shaped (Fig. 15A View Figure 15 )], process on anterior 1/3 of tegulum (arrowed in Fig. 12A View Figure 12 ) [vs on anterior 3/5 (arrowed in Fig. 15A View Figure 15 )] and female can be distinguished by the diameter of secondary spermathecae less than diameter of primary spermathecae (Fig. 13B View Figure 13 ) [vs almost same diameter (Fig. 16B View Figure 16 )], distance between primary spermathecae and secondary spermathecae more than half of diameter of secondary spermathecae (Fig. 13B View Figure 13 ) [vs less than half of diameter (Fig. 16B View Figure 16 )], secondary spermathecae separated by ~ 1.5 × diameters (Fig. 13B View Figure 13 ) [vs 1 × (Fig. 16B View Figure 16 )] and fertilization ducts pointing to 7:30 o’clock position (Fig. 13B View Figure 13 ) [vs 9:00 o’clock position (Fig. 16B View Figure 16 )]. T. qiubei sp. nov. also resembles T. dafang sp. nov., but can be distinguished by the tip of patellar apophysis pointed to 10:30 o’clock position (Fig. 17B View Figure 17 ) [vs 9:30 o’clock position (Fig. 17A View Figure 17 )], ventral retrolateral tibial apophysis shorter than dorsal retrolateral tibial apophysis (Fig. 12B View Figure 12 ) [vs almost as long as dorsal retrolateral tibial apophysis (Fig. 10B View Figure 10 )], conductor stalk makes up 1/2 of total conductor length (Fig. 12A View Figure 12 ) [vs 1/3 (Fig. 10A View Figure 10 )], process on tegulum present (Fig. 12A View Figure 12 ) [vs absent (Fig. 10A View Figure 10 )], copulatory openings facing each other (Fig. 13A View Figure 13 ) [vs touching each other (Fig. 11A View Figure 11 )], diameter of primary spermathecae ~ 1.5 × diameters of secondary spermathecae (Fig. 13B View Figure 13 ) [vs 2 × (Fig. 11B View Figure 11 )], distance between primary spermathecae and secondary spermathecae ~ 1 × diameter of secondary spermathecae (Fig. 13B View Figure 13 ) [vs 2 × (Fig. 11B View Figure 11 )], secondary spermathecae separated by ~ 1.5 × diameters (Fig. 13B View Figure 13 ) [vs 4 × (Fig. 11B View Figure 11 )], and fertilization ducts pointing to 7:30 o’clock position (Fig. 13B View Figure 13 ) [vs 9:00 o’clock position (Fig. 11B View Figure 11 )].
Description.
Male (holotype; Figs 12A, B View Figure 12 , 17B View Figure 17 , 20C View Figure 20 ). Total body length 2.92. Carapace 1.34 long, 1.05 wide; opisthosoma 1.58 long, 1.16 wide. AER straight and PER procurved slightly. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.04, ALE 0.09, PME 0.08, PLE 0.09; AME-AME 0.05, AME-ALE 0.01, PME-PME 0.08, PME-PLE 0.04, ALE-PLE 0.02. MOA 0.20 long, front width 0.11, back width 0.24. Clypeus 0.17 high. Chelicerae with three promarginal and four retromarginal teeth. Leg measurements: I 4.86 (1.39, 0.44, 1.12, 1.05, 0.86); II 4.64 (1.30, 0.45, 1.03, 1.04, 0.82); III 4.29 (1.18, 0.41, 0.95, 1.02, 0.73); IV 5.27 (1.40, 0.44, 1.21, 1.34, 0.88). Leg supination: femora I-III d1; tibiae III v2, IV d1 r1 v1; metatarsi III p1 v2, IV p1 r1 v2.
Coloration (Fig. 20C View Figure 20 ). Carapace yellowish, with indistinct dark yellow radial grooves, middle region with shield-shaped brown band, margin with brown pattern. Fovea longitudinal, reddish-brown. Ocular area with slight brown band; eight eyes without distinct black rims. Chelicerae, labium, gnathocoxae, and sternum yellowish. Sternum with brown marking and lighter heart region. Legs yellowish. Opisthosoma oval, grey, middle of anteriorly and laterally with rod-shaped dark patterns, middle of posteriorly with inverted dark V-shaped patterns; venter with brown patterns and brown ring around spinnerets. Spinnerets base brown and tip white.
Palp (Figs 12A, B View Figure 12 , 17B View Figure 17 ). Patellar apophysis with wide base and narrowed tip, the narrowed tip as long as the wide base. Ventral retrolateral tibial apophysis almost straight, almost 1/2 × longer than dorsal retrolateral tibial apophysis and as wide as dorsal retrolateral tibial apophysis. Cymbium 1.5 × longer than wide. Cymbial furrow almost as long as cymbium. Bulb almost oval. A triangle process presents at the prolateral edge of tegulum. Medium of tegulum with oval membranous area. Length of stalk of conductor almost half of total conductor length. Embolic tooth terminal flat. Embolus slender and whip-shaped.
Female (paratype IZCAS-Ar44682; Figs 13A, B View Figure 13 , 18B View Figure 18 , 19B View Figure 19 , 20D View Figure 20 ). Total body length 3.39. Carapace 1.36 long, 1.04 wide; opisthosoma 2.03 long, 1.44 wide. Eight eyes with distinct black rims. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.04, ALE 0.09, PME 0.08, PLE 0.09; AME-AME 0.03, AME-ALE 0.02, PME-PME 0.09, PME-PLE 0.04, ALE-PLE 0.02. MOA 0.20 long, front width 0.09, back width 0.23. Clypeus 0.17 high. Chelicerae with three promarginal and four retromarginal teeth. Leg measurements: I 4.51 (1.28, 0.46, 1.02, 0.99, 0.76); II 4.43 (1.28, 0.44, 0.98, 0.98, 0.75); III 4.25 (1.20, 0.44, 0.92, 1.03, 0.66); IV 5.37 (1.50, 0.45, 1.25, 1.32, 0.85). Leg supination: femora I-III d1; tibiae I v1, II v2, III p1 d2, r1, v3, IV p1 d2 r1 v2; metatarsi III p1 v2, IV p1 d2 r1 v1.
Coloration (Fig. 20D View Figure 20 ). As in male but carapace without shield-shaped band.
Epigyne (Figs 13A, B View Figure 13 , 18B View Figure 18 , 19B View Figure 19 ). Epigynal plate 1.45 × wider than long. Hoods 3 × depth than width. Copulatory openings arc-shaped, facing each other, circular. The width of thick copulatory ducts base 2 × wider than the thinner part. The branched shorter copulatory ducts connected to the secondary spermathecae, the other connected to the primary spermathecae. Primary spermathecae bean-shaped, longer than the width of the secondary spermathecae. Fertilization ducts directed at 7:30 o’clock position from spermathecae.
Variation.
Males (n = 4): total body length 2.54-3.21, carapace 1.10-1.47 long, 0.80-1.22 wide, opisthosoma 1.44-1.74 long, 1.09-1.20 wide. Females (n = 4): total body length 3.03-3.62, carapace 1.28-1.44 long, 1.08-1.16 wide, opisthosoma 1.68-2.30 long, 1.19-1.48 wide.
Etymology.
The specific epithet refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.
Distribution.
Known only from the type locality (Fig. 30 View Figure 30 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.