Polistes (Polistes) dominula ( Christ, 1791 )
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4784.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8D684A40-4102-4592-9084-7589B0B40028 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3863785 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1F52051F-FFFB-6B2E-EFD5-FCC995C5FAF4 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Polistes (Polistes) dominula ( Christ, 1791 ) |
| status |
|
220) Polistes (Polistes) dominula ( Christ, 1791) View in CoL
Vespa dominula Christ, 1791: 229 . Type data: Female, male, lost. Type locality: “ Kronenberg an der Höh ”, Germany.
Polistes italic Herrich-Schäffer, 1840:196 .
Polistes pectoralis “Meg. ” Herrich-Schäffer, 1841:39.
Polistes gallica var. lefebvrei Guérin, 1844: 447 .
Polistes maculatus Rudow, 1889: 171 .
Polistes merceti Dusmet, 1903: 146 , 149.
Polistes gallicus var. rufescens Buysson, 1912: 79 .
Distribution. India: Jammu & Kashmir. Elsewhere: Afghanistan; central and southern Europe; China; Cyprus; Germany; Iran; Israel; Jordan; Kazakhstan; Kyrgyzstan; Mongolia; Northern Africa; Pakistan; Russia; Syria; Tajikistan; Turkey; Turkmenistan; intoduced into North America, South America, Australia; New Zealand. (Carpenter 1996, Bleidorn et al. 2016, Rafi et al. 2017, Fateryga 2018).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Polistes (Polistes) dominula ( Christ, 1791 )
| Gawas, Sandesh M., Kumar, Girish, Pannure, Arati, Gupta, Ankita & Carpenter, James M. 2020 |
Polistes gallicus var. rufescens
| Buysson, R. du 1912: 79 |
Polistes merceti
| Dusmet, J. M. 1903: 146 |
Polistes maculatus
| Rudow, F. 1889: 171 |
Vespa dominula
| Christ, J. L. 1791: 229 |