Cryphocricos latus Usinger, 1947
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4958.1.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:95DBC2B4-D082-4D39-9815-7C3879E2BF5C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4693104 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/207387E3-E07E-FF9A-02CB-FD9753D49BD3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cryphocricos latus Usinger |
status |
|
Cryphocricos latus Usinger View in CoL
( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18–20 )
Cryphocricos latus Usinger 1947 View in CoL : Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 40:340–341.
Type repository: Snow Entomological Museum Collection (Lawrence, USA) .
Type locality: Costa Rica: San Isidro del General , 2,000 ft.
Discussion: The holotype is a brachypterous male ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18–20 ) and allotype a brachypterous female. Seven brachypterous paratypes also are housed in the Snow Museum. The macropterous male and female were described by Herrera & González (2013). Cryphocricos latus is associated with fast current, large rocks, and coarse pebbles ( Stout 1981). These tropical streams are subject to severe seasonal spates, which result in a high rate of downstream displacement of C. latus followed by a slow recolonization rate ( Stout 1981). Because the macropterous form is uncommon except in the dry season, its ability to recolonize upstream following a spate is temporally limited ( Stout 1982).
Diagnosis: This species is similar to C. obscuratus in “all characters” but differs from it by a wider body/length ratio, length> 7 mm, and claval commissure subequal to the length of the scutellum ( Usinger 1947). Specimens that I have examined from Costa Rica and Panama readily conform to characteristics of both species; thus, I suspect that C. latus and C. obscuratus are conspecific. Moreover, specimens of Cryphocricos from Guatemala and Belize also are small, and those from Belize had body width/length ratios suggesting a C. latus identity, but body lengths spanned those of three species ( C. hungerfordi , C. latus , and C. obscuratus ) ( Sites et al. 2018); thus, considerations of conspecificity must also include C. hungerfordi .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cryphocricos latus Usinger
Sites, Robert W. 2021 |
Cryphocricos latus
Usinger 1947 |