Andricus elodeoides Liu & Pang, 2022
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1134.89267 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B0A9A45F-CDA6-4E37-8DD3-A9D31C84C698 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/208DF5CE-4BF7-5411-ADFA-A3D37BC736CE |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Andricus elodeoides Liu & Pang |
status |
sp. nov. |
Andricus elodeoides Liu & Pang sp. nov.
Figs 1-6 View Figures 1–6 , 7-13 View Figures 7–13
Type materials.
Holotype ♀; Paratypes: 10♀, 8♂♂. China, Hunan Province, Changsha City (113°07'N, 28°25'E), 2011-V-11-20, leg. Xiao-Hui Yang, deposited in Insect Collection, Central South University of Forestry and Technology (CSUFT), Changsha, Hunan.
Etymology.
The species epithet derived from Elodea , the genus name of the aquatic plants well known as waterweeds, referring to the superficial resemblance of the cluster of galls of the species to these plants.
Additional materials examined.
Same data as holotype, 3♂, 3♀ (Cheng-Yuan Su leg.) . Jinzhai (31°38'N, 115°58'E), Anhui province. 3♂, 3♀ (Cheng-Yuan Su leg.) GoogleMaps . Wuhan (30°31'N, 114°31'E), Hubei province. 3♂, 3♀ (Cheng-Yuan Su leg.) GoogleMaps . Suichang (28°37'N, 119°19'E), Zhejiang province. 1♂, 1♀ (Cheng-Yuan Su leg.) GoogleMaps . Xinyang (32°02'N, 113°53'E), Henan province,. 3♂, 3♀ (Cheng-Yuan Su leg.) GoogleMaps . Taihu (30°34'N, 116°04'E), Anhui province. 3♂, 3♀ (Cheng-Yuan Su leg.) GoogleMaps , Qingyuan (27°44'N, 119°15'E), Zhejiang province. 3♂, 3♀ (Cheng-Yuan Su leg.) GoogleMaps , Zhenghe (27°23'N, 118°52'E), Fujian province. 3♂, 3♀ (Cheng-Yuan Su leg.) GoogleMaps , Zhouning (27°13'N, 119°20'E), Fujian province. 3♂, 3♀ (Cheng-Yuan Su leg.) GoogleMaps , Guiding (26°37'N, 107°14'E), Guizhou province. 3♂, 3♀ (Cheng-Yuan Su leg.) GoogleMaps , Shaoguan (24°59'N, 113°01'E), Guangdong province GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis.
The new species is similar to A. mairei ( Kieffer 1906), but differs from the latter in having: 1) vertex and frons glabrate with long setae evenly-spaced on vertex and scatted on frons in the new species (Fig. 3 View Figures 1–6 ), whereas vertex coriaceous and vertex and frons with sparse short setae in A. mairei ( Pujade-Villar et al. 2020: fig. 1b, d); 2) male antenna F1 strongly curved medially in the new species (Fig. 10 View Figures 7–13 ), but straight in A. mairei ( Pujade-Villar et al. 2020: fig. 2b); 3) mesopleuron glabrous in the new species (Fig. 6 View Figures 1–6 ), whereas with weak longitudinal striation medially in A. mairei ( Pujade-Villar et al. 2020: fig. 3c, d, but compare with fig. 3e); 4) mature galls of A. elodeoides are straight and cylindrical, fully covered with dense resinous white hairs (Fig. 14 View Figures 14, 15 ), whereas the galls of A. mairei are curved or strongly tapering in distal half, mostly shining smooth with an apical cluster of white hairs (Fig. 15 View Figures 14, 15 ).
Description.
Female: body length 2.6-2.8 mm (N = 5).
Coloration. Head area of compound eyes and frons black and gena yellow. Antenna uniformly dark brown to black, except for scape, pedicel and F1 brownish yellow. Mandible, maxillar and labial palpi dark brown. Legs uniformly brownish yellow. Mesosoma black; metasoma mostly reddish brown and posteriorly black. Hypopygial spine reddish brown.
Forewing with distinct veins R+Sc, R1+Sc, R1, Rs, Rs+M (somewhat faint basally), M, 2r, M+Cu1, Cu1, Cu1b and Cu1a; areolet distinct and small; marginal cell about 2.6-3.0 times as long as wide; all visible veins yellow except for the distal half of R+Sc, R1+Sc, 2r, and M. The distal half of M+Cu1 black (Fig. 12 View Figures 7–13 ).
Head coriaceous, 1.2 times as wide as high in anterior view, nearly oval, broader than mesosoma in front view and 2.2 times as broad as long in dorsal view. Gena not broadened behind eyes in dorsal view. Height of eye about 3.4 times the length of malar space. Frons glabrate with evenly spaced long setae, with ocellar triangle indistinctly rugose; lower face and malar space glabrate and distinctly setose. Clypeus distinct and impressed; epistomal sulcus distinct; anterior tentorial pits small, but distinct; clypeo-pleurostomal line distinct. Transfacial distance slightly bigger than height of eye; distance between inner margin of eye and outer rim of antennal torulus slightly wider than distance between antennal toruli, but as wide as diameter of torulus (Fig. 1 View Figures 1–6 ). Posterior ocelli widely separated from each other, ratios of POL/OOL, POL/LOL, and LOL/OOL 2.1, 2.7 and 0.9, respectively. In dorsal view, posterior margin of anterior ocellus nearly aligned with anterior margin of posterior ocelli (Fig. 3 View Figures 1–6 ). Vertex glabrate, covered with scattered long setae. Gena coriarious, posteriorly with sparce long setae; postgena mostly glabrate with dense setae in outer edge. Occiput very finely imbricate and setose except medially; posterior tentorial pits distinct. Gular sulci absent; area around occipital foramen glabrous (Fig. 2 View Figures 1–6 ).
Antenna filiform with 11 flagellomeres, slightly tapering toward apex; pedicel sub-spherical; relative lengths of scape, pedicel and F1-F11: 10:6:11:9:9:8:8:8:7:7:6:6:13; placoid sensillae distinctly visible on F2-F11 (Fig. 9 View Figures 7–13 ).
Mesosoma longer than high in lateral view. Pronotum median length two ninth of length of outer lateral margin. Anterior plate of pronotum areolate to rugose and densely setose laterally (Fig. 6 View Figures 1–6 ); Mesoscutum nearly as long as width measured at anterior tip of tegulae, with some small foveae and setae along outer edge. Notauli distinct and glabrous, lined with setae along sides, and slightly broadened posteriorly. Mesoscutellum broader than long, areolate-rugose and sparsely setose. Scutellar foveae deeply impressed and glabrous, separated by a median carina. Mesopleural triangle glabrate and densely setose. Metapleural sulcus reaching mesopleuron in upper 2/3 of its height; metapleuron glabrate with sparse setae (Fig. 6 View Figures 1–6 ). Median dorsellum area rugose with dense setae. Propodeum with long and dense setae; lateral propodeal carinae distinct and parallel; median propodeal area confused-rugulose, lateral propodeal area with dense long and appressed setae (Fig. 7 View Figures 7–13 ). Nucha short, width as long in height and lateral view, and longitudinally costate with posterior punctate-areolate ring (Fig. 6 View Figures 1–6 ).
Metasoma 1.2 times as long as high in lateral view; abdominal tergite II 1.5 times as high as long in lateral view, laterally with anterior patch of short setae; tergite VII dorsally and VIII with long setae. Prominent part of hypopygium slender, distally not pointed; and ventrally with a row of short setae (Fig. 4 View Figures 1–6 ).
Male: Similar to female, but different as below. Antenna with 12 flagellomeres, length of scape 1.25 times as long as wide; pedicel almost same as long as broad. F1 strongly curved medially. Lengths of scape, pedicel and F1-F12: 10:10:7:8:8:7:7:7:7:7:7:14. Upper face black, lower face yellow (Figs 8 View Figures 7–13 , 10 View Figures 7–13 ).
Gall.
Galls are monolocular and form clusters of 50-60 galls on twigs of host plant. Galls are covered with very dense resinous white hairs, which become brown at the terminal of the galls as galls mature. Individual galls straight and cylindrical (Fig. 14 View Figures 14, 15 ), but not curved or strongly tapering in distal half as in A. mairei (Fig. 15 View Figures 14, 15 ).
Biology.
All specimens emerged from galls collected from Quercus serrata . The adults of the new species appeared in early to mid-May (which overlaps with the emergence period of A. mairei ). Populations were extremely female-biased at 95.5-97.8% (while that of A. mairei were 5.4-43.5%) (Table 1 View Table 1 ).
Distribution.
The new species is currently known from China in several provinces in the middle to lower reaches of the Yangtze River, including Henan (Xinyang), Anhui (Jinzhai, Shucheng, and Taihu), Hubei (Wuhan), Hunan (Changsha and Shaoyang), and Zhejiang (Suichang and Qingyuan).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |