Glycine

Han, Jaeyeong, Locke, Steven P, Herman, Theresa K, Schroeder, Nathan E & Hartman, Glen L, 2022, Evaluation of perennial Glycine species for response to Meloidogyne incognita, Rotylenchulus reniformis, and Pratylenchus penetrans, Journal of Nematology 54 (1), pp. 1-13 : 6

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.21307/jofnem-2022-001
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12103334
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2237878E-FFE4-1046-FF55-F92ECBFF073A
treatment provided by	Felipe
scientific name	Glycine
status

Treatment

Evaluation of perennial Glycine View in CoL species for resistance to R. reniformis

The Bartlett test for homogeneity of variance was not significant ( P > 0.05) between trials so data were pooled for analysis ( Table 3 View Table 3 ). The perennial Glycine View in CoL species and soybean checks differed in their response to R. reniformis based on the number of eggs and vermiform nematodes per gram of root. The mean number of R. reniformis per gram of root on susceptible check PI 88788 was significantly higher than that of resistant check cv. Forrest. In contrast to M. incognita , some perennial Glycine accessions (PIs 505188, 505214, 505238, 509487, 559298, and 573045) were significantly more susceptible to R. reniformis than the susceptible check PI 88788. Only G. tomentella PI 441001 had a significantly lower number of R. reniformis per gram of root than cv. Forrest.