Scrapter peringueyi (Cockerell, 1921), 2022

Bossert, Silas & Noort, Simon van, 2022, A group of two: Scrapter peringueyi is not a synonym of Scrapter heterodoxus (Hymenoptera, Colletidae, Scraptrinae), African Invertebrates 63 (1), pp. 1-18 : 1

publication ID	https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.63.76934
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CB17C6B2-CF80-4B11-A100-E340E5CB66A2
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/24ED8E03-1D4A-5980-990B-033ADB8596EB
treatment provided by	African Invertebrates by Pensoft (2022-01-21 14:29:52, last updated 2024-11-30 03:55:59)
scientific name	Scrapter peringueyi (Cockerell, 1921)
status	stat. rev.

Treatment

Scrapter peringueyi (Cockerell, 1921) stat. rev.

Figures 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 , 5 View Figure 5

Polyglossa peringueyi Cockerell, 1921: 205.

Material examined.

Holotype: South Africa: Knysna, C. C., October 1916, leg. L. Péringuey, ♀, SAMC . Additional material: South Africa: Knysna, C. C., October 1916, leg. L. Péringuey, ♀, SANC, Database No. HYMA04122. Cape Province, Hermanus, 34°24.76'S, 19°17.25'E, 28 September 2001, leg. B. N. Danforth, C. D. Eardley, K. L. Walker, 17 ♂, CUIC. Cape Province, Pearly Beach, Bredasdorp, September 1959, -34.6667, 19.51667, leg. South African Museum Expedition, 3♂ and 2♀, SAMC, cat. no. SAM-HYM-B007139. Cape Province, Pearly Beach, Bredasdorp, September 1959, -34.6667, 19.51667, leg. South African Museum Expedition, 41♂ and 5♀, SAMC, cat. no. SAM - HYM-B007773. Cape Province, Somerset (W.) Strand, 25 October 1925, -34.1167, 18.8333, leg. H. Brauns, 1♂, SAMC, cat. no. SAM-HYM-B007776b. Cape Province, Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve , 18 September 1975, leg. V. B. Whitehead, 1♂ and 3♀, SAMC, cat. no. SAM-HYM-B007778. Cape Province, Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve , Olifantsbos, near Skaife center, -34.2667, 18.3833, 18-19 September 1993, leg. S. van Noort, 1♀, SAMC, cat. no. SAM-HYM-B007779. Cape Province, Vermont, -34.4167, 19.1667, 10 October 1977, leg. V. B. Whitehead, 1♂, SAMC, cat. no. SAM-HYM-B007780. Cape Province, Knysna, October 1916, leg. L. Péringuey, 5♀, SAMC, cat. no. SAM-HYM-B007782. Cape Province, Hout Bay , opp. Duiker Is., -34.0333, 18.3, 11 October 1986, leg. K. Steiner, 1♀, SAMC, cat. no. SAM-HYM-B007783. Cape Province, Strandfontein, -34.0833, 18.5500, 1 November 1960, leg. F. W. Gess, 1♂, SAMC, cat. no. SAM-HYM-B007787. Cape Province, Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve , 8 October 1986, leg. K. Steiner, 1♂, SAMC, cat. no. SAM-HYM-B009504. Cape Province, Hout Bay , Duiker Point , -34.0333, 18.3, 11 October 1986, leg. K. Steiner, 1♂, SAMC, cat. no. SAM-HYM - B009505 GoogleMaps .

Diagnosis.

Scrapter peringueyi is morphologically very similar to S. heterodoxus . ♂: the male of S. peringueyi differs from that of S. heterodoxus in the shape of the projecting apical portion of the hind tibia, which is parallel-sided (tapering in S. heterodoxus ) (Figs 1E View Figure 1 , 4E View Figure 4 , 5A View Figure 5 , 5B View Figure 5 ). It further differs from S. heterodoxus in the surface sculpturing of the basal zone of the propodeum, which is substrigulate in S. peringueyi and rugulose in S. heterodoxus (Figs 1D View Figure 1 , 3D View Figure 3 , 5C View Figure 5 , 5D View Figure 5 ). The integument on the mesoscutum is shagreened between the punctation, whereas it is polished in S. heterodoxus .

♀: the female of S. peringueyi differs from S. heterodoxus in the same characters as the male, except for the shape of the hind tibia. The surface sculpturing of the basal zone of the propodeum is substrigulate, whereas it is rugulose in S. heterodoxus (Figs 2D View Figure 2 , 3D View Figure 3 , 5E View Figure 5 , 5F View Figure 5 ). The integument between the punctation on the mesoscutum is shagreened in S. peringueyi and it is polished in S. heterodoxus .

Figures

Figure 1. Male lectotype of Scrapter heterodoxus (Cockerell, 1921). A habitus, dorsolateral view, and labels B habitus, lateral view C head, frontal view D propodeum E hind leg tibia F fore wing.

Figure 2. Female non-type specimen of Scrapter heterodoxus (Cockerell, 1921), (SAM-HYM-B 007786). A habitus, dorsal view B habitus, lateral view C head, frontal view D propodeum E labels F fore wing.

Figure 3. Female holotype of Scrapter peringueyi (Cockerell, 1921), stat. rev. (SAM-HYM-B 000144). A habitus, dorsolateral view B habitus, lateral view C head, frontal view D propodeum E labels F fore wing.

Figure 4. Non-type male specimen of Scrapter peringueyi (Cockerell, 1921), stat. rev. A habitus, dorsal view B habitus, lateral view C head, frontal view D propodeum E hind leg tibia F fore wing.

Figure 5. Comparison of the shape of the male hind leg tibia and propodeal sculpture. A Scrapter peringueyi (Cockerell, 1921), stat. rev. hind leg tibial apex, non-type male specimen (deposited in CUIC) B Scrapter heterodoxus (Cockerell, 1921) hind leg tibial apex, non-type male specimen (deposited in CUIC) C Scrapter peringueyi (Cockerell, 1921), stat. rev. propodeal sculpture, non-type male specimen (SAM-HYM-B 007139) D Scrapter heterodoxus (Cockerell, 1921) propodeal sculpture, lectotype male (SAM-HYM-B 000145) E Scrapter peringueyi (Cockerell, 1921), stat. rev. propodeal sculpture, holotype female (SAM-HYM-B 000144) F Scrapter heterodoxus (Cockerell, 1921) propodeal sculpture, non-type female (SAM-HYM-B 007786).