Vatellus lateralis Miller, 2005
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2005.00180.x |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2630926F-C14F-217D-6EE5-FE3484423531 |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Vatellus lateralis |
status |
comb. nov. |
VATELLUS LATERALIS (SHARP, 1882) View in CoL COMB. NOV.
Macrovatellus lateralis Sharp, 1882b: 283 View in CoL ; Zimmermann, 1920: 30; Trémouilles, 1995: 27.
Macrovatellus rudis Sharp, 1882b: 283 View in CoL ; Zimmermann, 1920: 30; Trémouilles, 1995: 27, syn. nov.
Macrovatellus marginalis Sharp, 1882b: 284 View in CoL ; Zimmermann, 1920: 30; Trémouilles, 1995: 27, syn. nov.
Macrovatellus deplanatus Zimmermann, 1919: 125 View in CoL ; 1920: 30; Trémouilles, 1995: 27, syn. nov.
Type information: Macrovatellus lateralis : Lectotype (designated here to clarify assignment of this name with this species) ♂ in BMNH labelled, ‘Type [circular disc with red border]/ Uruguay. [green line transversely across middle of label]/Sharp Coll 1905–313/Type 438G Macrovatellus lateralis Uruguay 11.5. [handwritten]/ SYN- TYPE [circular disc with blue border]/LECTO- TYPE Macrovatellus lateralis Sharp, 1882 . des. K.B. Miller 2002 [red label with black line border].’ There is a single paralectotype in BMNH labelled, ‘Type 438 E [handwritten]/Para-type [circular disc with yellow bor- der]/ Uruguay. [green line transversely across middle of label]/Sharp Coll 1905–313/ Macrovatellus lateralis, Sharp Paratype. [handwritten]/SYN- TYPE [circular disc with blue border]/ PARALECTOTYPE Macrovatellus lateralis Sharp 1882 . des. K.B. Miller 2002 [blue label with black line border].’
Macrovatellus rudis : Lectotype (designated here to clarify assignment of this name with this species) ♂ in BMNH labelled, ‘Type [circular disc with red border]/ S.America. Colombia. [green line transversely across middle of label]/Sharp Coll 1905–313./Type 430 ♂ Macrovatellus rudis Am.Mer. [handwritten]/SYN- TYPE [circular disc with blue border] / LECTOTYPE Macrovatellus rudis Sharp 1882 . des. K.B. Miller 2002 [red label with black line border].’ Sharp indicated that he had multiple specimens (both males and females) when he described this species. However, only a single male in BMNH was examined that appears to be of the original syntype series. It is selected as the lectotype.
Macrovatellus marginalis : Lectotype (designated here to clarify assignment of this name with this species) ♀ in BMNH labelled, ‘Type [circular disc with red border]/ S. America: Brazil. [green line transversely across middle of label]/Santa Rita Sep Sahlberg 1850 [handwritten]/Type 441 Macrovatellus marginalis Santa Rita [handwritten]/SYN- TYPE [circular disc with blue border].’ Sharp had an additional female specimen. Of the two specimens in BMNH labelled as this species and from Sharp’s collection, only one is a female with label information that would indicate it is one of the two original syntypes. Thus it is selected as the lectotype. The other male specimen is probably not of the original type series.
Macrovatellus deplanatus: The type of this species is apparently not in MNHU (M. Uhlig, pers. comm.) nor in ZSBS (M. Baehr, pers. comm.) (the latter the location of most of Zimmermann’s types). The type locality and Zimmermann’s description (1919) strongly suggest that the species is the same as the one treated here as V. lateralis . Two specimens of V. lateralis in ZSBS labelled as ‘ M.? deplanatus ’ (clearly not the types as they are labelled as having been collected in Venezuela) were identified by Guignot, suggesting that he regarded V. lateralis and M. deplanatus as similar, at least. Based on these lines of evidence, I have synonymized this name with V. lateralis . However, until the types are found, this synonymy should be regarded as provisory.
Type locality: Macrovatellus lateralis : Uruguay. Macrovatellus rudis : South America.
Macrovatellus marginalis : Brazil, Santa Rita. Macrovatellus deplanatus : Brazil, Santos.
Diagnosis: This species may be distinguished from other Vatellus by the following combination of characters: (1) dorsal and ventral surfaces distinctly alutaceous, elytral surface sculpture as in Figure 5 View Figures 2–7 ; (2) eyes large, protruding ( Fig. 161 View Figures 161–168 ); (3) transverse pronotal crease distinctive ( Fig. 161 View Figures 161–168 ); (4) male pro- and mesobasotarsomeres ( Fig. 165 View Figures 161–168 ) much broader than in female ( Fig. 166 View Figures 161–168 ); (5) apical lobe on abdominal sternum VI present but not strongly expressed ( Fig. 167 View Figures 161–168 ); (6) male and female genitalia distinctive ( Figs 169– 173 View Figures 169–173 ). This species is very similar to V. mexicanus from which is distinguishable by the median lobe more slender and apically slightly deflexed and the intermediate duct between the spermatheca and receptacle longer and more strongly sinuate. The apices of the lateral lobes extend to or beyond the apex of the median lobe in V. mexicanus ( Fig. 140 View Figures 139–146 ) whereas in V. lateralis the apices of the lateral lobes end well short of the apex of the median lobe ( Fig. 139 View Figures 139–146 ).
Description:
Habitus. Lateral outline distinctly discontinuous in dorsal aspect, lateral elytral margins evenly rounded ( Fig. 161 View Figures 161–168 ), body not dorsoventrally flattened. Measurements are given in Table 1.
Coloration. Head yellow; pronotum brown, irregularly yellow along anterior and lateral margins; elytron dark brown to yellow-brown with yellow maculae subapically and laterally along margins, basally with few yellow maculae ( Fig. 161 View Figures 161–168 ); venter and appendages red brown to light brown, infuscate, especially laterally on metacoxae.
Sculpture and structure. Head with punctation distinct, variable in size, coarse medially between eyes, becoming finer anteriorly, interpuncture surfaces smooth, shiny to slightly microreticulate, surface posterior to eyes alutaceous, rough; anterior clypeal margin rounded; eyes large, strongly protruding ( Fig. 161 View Figures 161–168 ). Pronotum densely punctate, but punctures strongly obscured by rough, alutaceous sculpturing similar to Figure 5 View Figures 2–7 , pale setae moderately long; pronotum cordate, lateral pronotal margin rounded anteriorly, broadest near anterior angles, posterior angles acute ( Fig. 161 View Figures 161–168 ); lateral bead obscured; transverse sulcus distinctly impressed. Elytron with punctation dense but edges of punctures strongly obscured by dense alutaceous microsculpturing similar to Figure 5 View Figures 2–7 , light setae moderately dense and conspicuous. Prosternum short, roughly sculptured, glabrous; prosternal process broad with distinctly rounded medial carina, lateral margins rounded, apex triangularly produced, glabrous, apex pointed. Metasternum with punctation dense laterally, punctures large and shallow, somewhat obscured by alutaceous sculpturing; anteromedial margin slightly produced ventrally. Abdominal sternal sutures not unusually modified; sterna with punctation dense over entire lateral surface, finer medially, obscured by alutaceous sculpturing; sixth abdominal sternum with apical lobe inconspicuously produced, triangular, not strongly produced ( Fig. 167 View Figures 161–168 ); speleum broad basally, sides strongly convergent, apex moderately rounded, not strongly curved ( Fig. 168 View Figures 161–168 ). Metacoxae with lateral portion densely punctate over entire surface, punctures shallow, somewhat obscured by alutaceous sculpturing; metacoxal lines strongly approximate posteriorly, strongly divergent anteriorly ( Fig. 163 View Figures 161–168 ); medial portion moderately punctate, punctures finely setose. Metatrochanter rounded, offset ( Fig. 164 View Figures 161–168 ); metatarsal claws minutely dentate.
Male genitalia. Median lobe in lateral aspect evenly curved, apically gradually narrowed, becoming slen- der, apex narrowly rounded, distinctly but not sharply curved dorsally, with few subapical setae, basal portion elongate and moderately broad ( Fig. 170 View Figures 169–173 ); in ventral aspect moderately broad, margins slightly convergent apically, somewhat sinuate basomedially, apex narrowed relatively abruptly, apex acutely rounded ( Fig. 171 View Figures 169–173 ). Lateral lobe relatively broad, apical portion evenly and shallowly curved, broad to broadly rounded apex, apical an apicomedial margin with dense series of fine setae; subapical stout, curved setae absent ( Fig. 169 View Figures 169–173 ).
Female genitalia. Gonocoxosternite moderately robust, medial margin moderately broad, very irregular; anterior margin strongly concave; anterior lobe relatively slender and elongate ( Fig. 172 View Figures 169–173 ). Gonocoxa broad, medial margin broadly rounded, apex broadly rounded; apodeme short and slender ( Fig. 172 View Figures 169–173 ). Bursa copulatrix moderate in size, not modified; spermathecal duct moderately long; receptacle ovoid, about half the size of spermatheca; intermediate duct moderately long, strongly sinuate ( Fig. 173 View Figures 169–173 ); spermatheca subspherical, triangular process moderately long, broad; fertilization duct short ( Fig. 172 View Figures 169–173 ).
Sexually dimorphic characters. Mesotrochanter and mesofemur of male with setal brushes well developed, that of mesofemur moderately elongate. Male with pro- and mesobasotarsomeres ( Fig. 165 View Figures 161–168 ) considerably broader than in female ( Fig. 166 View Figures 161–168 ).
Intraspecific variation. This species varies substantially in size and shape. There is also considerable variation in degree of expression of the cuticular microsculpture with females exhibiting it to a greater degree. The extent of the maculations is highly variable, but maculae are generally distinct though in some cases they may be difficult to distinguish from the background coloration.
Natural history: This species is known from black lights, lowland marshes and subtropical moist forest.
Distribution: Vatellus lateralis has been collected from Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay ( Fig. 311 View Figure 311 ).
Phylogenetic relationships: This species is part of the clade containing species similar to V. mexicanus ( Fig. 316 View Figures 315–316 ). However, within this group this species does not have clear affinities with any other particular species. It is very similar to V. mexicanus in many features.
Discussion: The species is widespread and relatively commonly collected throughout tropical South America. It has been described several times. Examination of the types of V. lateralis , V. rudis and V. marginalis indicate that these names refer to the same species. Vatellus lateralis comes first in Sharp’s (1882b) monograph, so I selected it as the senior name. The strong similarity between this species and V. mexicanus may indicate that the two should be classified as a single species. However, consistent differences in male and female genitalia and allopatric distributions suggest that the two are distinctive. Specimens distributed between the southern range of V. mexicanus and the northern range of V. lateralis should be examined in the future for intermediate character states.
Material examined: Bolivia: Beni, Beni Stn. Palm Camp , NE San Borja, at light, R.W. Brooks (1, USNM) ; Santa Ana , 14 August 1937, HE Hinton (16, BMNH) ; Trinidad, July–August 1937, HE Hinton (6, BMNH) ; Trinidad, 29–30 July 1937, HE Hinton (4, BMNH) ; Beni , 7.0 km SW Trinidad. 14∞52¢12≤S 64∞57¢32≤W, 18 July 1998, weedy pond, KB Miller (6, KBMC) ; Beni , Prov. Cercado 9.5 km N Trinidad. 14∞46¢34≤S 64∞50¢00≤S, 17 June 1999, shallow marsh, KB Miller (2, KBMC) . Brazil: Alto da Serra be Sao Paulo 1929 (2, MNHN) ; Bahia Encruzilhada , 960 m, 7 November 1972, Moacir Alvarenga (1, FSCA) ; Caraca , Minas Gerais, December 1885, E Gouveille (4, MNHN) ; Caraqa , 1884, P Germain (17, MNHN) ; Encruzilhada , 980 m, Bahia, November 1974, M Alvarenga (3, MNHN) ; Minas Gerias Aguas Vermlehas , December 1983, BLT, Moacir Alvarenga (6, FSCA) ; Minas Gerias, Aguas Vermelhas , December 1983, BLT, M Alvarenga (7, FSCA) ; Par. Curitiba , 29 June 1969, P and P. Spangler (7, USNM) ; Prov. Minas Gerais Aquas Vermelhas , December 1998, FZ Vaz-de-Mello (33, LHIC) ; Rio Grande del Norte, Natal , March 1952, M Alvarenga (3, FSCA) . Paraguay: Central Department, Cacupe Road, Arroyo Yagua Resa y Ypacai , 10 April 1980, PJ Spangler, MM Culzoni, D Wood (1, USNM) . Peru: Madre de Dios; Rio Tambopata Res. , 30 air km SW Pto Maldonado, 26–30 November 1979, subtropical moist forest, JP Heppner (1, USNM) . Uruguay: (1, MNHN) ; Artigma Supulturez, Rio Charreis Pionda de Negro Muezto , 10 December 1966 b, CS Carbonell, MA Mono, FR San Martin (1, FSCA) ; Montevideo, Al Cassabo , 26 March 1932 (1, FSCA) ; Payendui Rio Uruguay Barra Arroyo Guavigo , 9–11 February 1970, MS Moratorio, MA Mono, GJ Wibmer (1, FSCA) ; Rivera Arriera , 3–7 February 1933, CS Carbonell (1, FSCA) ; Rocha Ruta 10, Aguas Dulces , 09–11 October 1970, MS Moratorio, MA Mono, GJ Wibmer (2, FSCA) .
VATELLUS HAAGI WEHNCKE, 1876 View in CoL
( FIGS 174–188 View Figures 174–181 View Figures 182–188 , 313)
Vatellus haagi Wehncke, 1876: 357 View in CoL .
Macrovatellus haagi View in CoL ; Sharp, 1882b: 284 (comb. nov.); Régimbart, 1899b:1, 1903: 46; Zimmermann, 1919: 124, 1920: 30; Trémouilles, 1995: 27.
Type information: Lectotype (designated here to clarify assignment of this name with this species), ♂ in MNHN labelled, ‘[small, light purple square]/Haag [handwritten, black line around label]/Brazilia [handwritten, green label with black line around border]/ Haagi [handwritten, black line around border, additional illegible word below “Haagi”/ LECTOTYPE Vatellus haagi Wehncke, 1876 . des. by K.B. Miller 2003 [red label with double black line border].’ Wehncke (1876) did not indicate the number of specimens on which he based his description, although Nilsson (2001) concluded that there are syntypes. Wehncke’s specimens went to Oberthur and thence to the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris ( MNHN). A single specimen in MNHN was examined that matches his description, and the label information currently on the specimen suggests that it, at least, is a specimen on which he based the Description: It is selected as the lectotype.
Type locality: Brazil, Corrientes. Diagnosis: This species may be distinguished from other Vatellus by the following combination of characters: (1) dorsal and ventral surfaces distinctly alutaceous, elytral surface sculpture as in Figure 5 View Figures 2–7 ; (2) eyes large, protruding ( Fig. 174 View Figures 174–181 ); (3) transverse pronotal crease distinctive ( Fig. 174 View Figures 174–181 ); (4) male pro- and mesobasotarsomeres ( Fig. 178 View Figures 174–181 ) much broader than in female ( Fig. 179 View Figures 174–181 ); (5) apical lobe on abdominal sternum VI present but not strongly expressed ( Fig. 180 View Figures 174–181 ); (6) male and female genitalia distinct ( Figs 182–188 View Figures 182–188 ). In this species the male median lobe is apically broadly truncate in ventral aspect ( Figs 183, 185 View Figures 182–188 ) and distinctly deflexed in lateral aspect ( Fig. 182 View Figures 182–188 ). The apex is strongly beset with short, proximally directed spines ( Fig. 185 View Figures 182–188 ). The female bursa is the largest of any Vatellus and is broad, strongly dorsoventrally compressed and strongly sinuate ( Figs 186, 187 View Figures 182–188 ). The prosternal process is apically relatively blunt, not flattened and apically pointed as in most Vatellus .
Description:
Habitus. Body outline strongly discontinuous in dorsal aspect, lateral margins of elytra strongly rounded ( Fig. 174 View Figures 174–181 ), not dorsoventrally compressed. Measurements are given in Table 1.
Coloration. Head yellow; pronotum yellow, yellowbrown medially, narrowly brown along anterior and broadly along posterior margins; elytron dark brown to yellow-brown with yellow maculae subapically and laterally along margins, basal margin irregularly and broadly yellow ( Fig. 174 View Figures 174–181 ); venter and appendages redbrown to light brown, infuscate, especially laterally on metacoxae.
Sculpture and structure. Head with punctation distinct, variable in size, coarse medially between eyes, becoming finer anteriorly, interpuncture surfaces smooth, shiny to slightly microreticulate, surface posterior to eyes alutaceous, rough; anterior clypeal margin rounded; eyes large, strongly protruding. Pronotum densely punctate, but punctures strongly obscured by rough, alutaceous sculpturing similar to Figure 5 View Figures 2–7 , pale setae moderately long; pronotum cordate, lateral pronotal margin rounded anteriorly, broadest near anterior angles, posterior angles slightly obtuse; lateral bead obscured; transverse sulcus distinctly impressed. Elytron with punctation dense but edges of punctures strongly obscured by dense alutaceous sculpturing similar to pronotum, light setae moderately dense and conspicuous. Prosternum short, roughly sculptured, glabrous; prosternal process broad, flat, medially with conspicuous protrusion to rounded carina, lateral margins parallelsided, apex broad, truncate with fringe of fine setae. Metasternum with punctation dense laterally, punctures large and shallow, somewhat obscured by alutaceous sculpturing; anteromedial margin narrowly produced ventrally, apex acute. Abdominal sternal sutures not unusually modified; sterna with punctation dense over entire lateral surface, finer medially, obscured by alutaceous sculpturing; sixth abdominal sternum with apical lobe narrow, triangular, not strongly produced; speleum broad basally, sides strongly convergent, apex narrowly rounded, not strongly curved. Metacoxae with lateral portion densely punctate over entire surface, punctures shallow, somewhat obscured by alutaceous sculpturing; metacoxal lines strongly approximate posteriorly, strongly divergent anteriorly ( Fig. 176 View Figures 174–181 ); medial portion moderately punctate, punctures finely setose. Metatrochanter rounded, offset ( Fig. 177 View Figures 174–181 ); metatarsal claws minutely dentate.
Male genitalia. Median lobe in lateral aspect moderately narrow, slightly expanded medially, apex narrowly rounded, distinctly curved dorsally, with large field of short spines over ventrolateral surfaces, basal portion long, narrow ( Fig. 182 View Figures 182–188 ); in ventral aspect with lateral margins approximately parallel, apex abruptly truncate, broad ( Figs 183, 185 View Figures 182–188 ). Lateral lobe very long, slender, with apical portion evenly curved, apically distinctly expanded and broadly rounded, densely covered with long, fine setae along lateral and apical margins; with long, stout, subapical setae absent ( Fig. 184 View Figures 182–188 ).
Female genitalia. Gonocoxosternite broad, robust, apical angle rounded, medial margin membranous, anterior margin distinctly concave, anterior lobe very long, robust, apically expanded and truncate ( Fig. 186 View Figures 182–188 ). Gonocoxa robust, main portion broadest medially, apex obtusely rounded, with numerous spinous setae along apicoventral margins and over dorsal surface, apodeme narrow, as long as main portion ( Fig. 186 View Figures 182–188 ). Bursa copulatrix very long, robust, broad and dorsoventrally flattened, apex folded dorsally ( Figs 186, 187 View Figures 182–188 ); spermathecal duct moderately long, narrow; receptacle spherical, about two-thirds size of spermatheca ( Fig. 186 View Figures 182–188 ); intermediate duct relatively short, curved but not strongly coiled or twisted ( Fig. 188 View Figures 182–188 ); spermatheca subspherical, produced posteriorly, triangular process relatively narrow basally, broadly expanded and rounded apically; fertilization duct short, curved ( Fig. 186 View Figures 182–188 ).
Sexually dimorphic characters. Male with welldeveloped mesotrochanteric brush of setae and mesofemoral brush well-developed in elongate cupshaped form. Male pro- and mesobasotarsomeres ( Fig. 178 View Figures 174–181 ) much more broadly expanded than in female ( Fig. 179 View Figures 174–181 ), similar in length ( Figs 178, 179 View Figures 174–181 ).
Intraspecific variation. This species is somewhat variable in coloration and extent of maculations on the elytra. However, the species is, in general, relatively uniform in characters.
Natural history: Vatellus haagi has been collected at lights and from roadside pools.
Distribution: Vatellus haagi is found is southern South America and has been collected from Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay and Uruguay (Fig. 313).
Phylogenetic relationships: This species is part of the clade containing species similar to V. mexicanus ( Fig. 316 View Figures 315–316 ). However, within this group this species does not have clear affinities with any other particular species.
Material examined: Argentina: Ao. P Verne , 4 km N Va San Jose, 15 November 1973, OS Flint (1, USNM) ; Bs. As. Laguna Chascomus at Ao. San Felton , 20 February 1974, OS Flint (1, USNM) ; Buenos Aires, 17 November 1912 (3, BMNH) ; Buenos Aires, v Belgrano , 10–15 October 1905, R Thaxter (1, MCZC) ; Chaco, Charata , March 1991 (1, LHIC) ; Concordia , Prov Etre Rios (1, MNHN) ; Cord, Carlos Paz , 26–27 May 1969, PJ Spangler (1, USNM) ; Eldorado Misiones , 8 December 1964 (1, MNHN) ; Entre Rios, Colon , 1 February 1988 (1, LHIC) ; Estancia la Noria, Rio San Javier , Santa Fe, 19 December 1911, GE Bryant (2, BMNH) ; Hohenau. Alto-Parana , 6 September 1937, H Jacob (1, BMNH) ; Misiones, Jardin America, Salto Tabay , 22 December 1990, riverside forest UV light, S & J Peck (1, CMNC) ; Prov. Buenos Aires, Colon , 29 December 1991, at light, Archangelsky (3, LHIC) ; Prov. Chaco San Bernardo , 1 February 1982, at light, Dilorio (3, LHIC) ; Prov. Entre Rios, Department Colon / Liebig , October 1989, R Foerster (9, LHIC) ; Rio Paraguay, Formosa , 4 December 1973, OS Flint (1, USNM) ; Santa Fe Reconquista, 13 February 1979, RE Woodruff, H Cordo (1, FSCA) ; Villa Ana , FCSFe, 25 December, at light, KJ Hayward (1, BMNH) ; Villa Ana, P.C.S. Fe , January 1926, KJ Hayward (1, USNM) . Bolivia: San Antonio de Parapeti Rio Parapeti Santa Cruz, 15–19 July 1964, B Malkin (1, FSCA) ; Santa Cruz, 11–12 May 1969, P and P Spangler (2, USNM) ; Santa Cruz, 60 mi N Santa Cruz, Saavedra Exp. Sta. , 3–5 January 1960, R Cumming (1, USNM) ; Santa Cruz, Ayacucho , 13–14 May 1969, P and P Spangler (12, USNM) ; Sta. Cruz, Prov. Chiquitos, 1.3 km WSW San Jose , 28 June 1999, stream pool, KB Miller (16, KBMC) . Paraguay: December 1936 (1, MNHN); (1, MNHN) ; Asuncion, 7 October 1980, DC Lowrie (3, USNM) ; Asuncion, 8 January 1991, Dreshsel (1, LHIC) ; Cen. 15 km NE Asuncion, 21 June 1969, P and P Spangler (11, USNM) ; Cen. 2 km N Luque, 23–24 June 1969, P and P Spangler (32, USNM) ; Cen., Ypacarai , 22 June 1969, P and P Spangler (1, USNM) ; Cord. San Bernardino , 22 June 1969, P and P Spangler (18, USNM) ; Department Central, Lambare , 1991, Drechsel (1, LHIC) ; Department Central , Asuncion, 5 October 1991, U. Drechsel (1, LHIC) ; Hohenau, Alto-Parana , 5 September 1937, H Jacob (1, BMNH) ; Paraguari Department Ybycui 20 km SE, ruta La Rosada, Ybycui , 13 April 1980, roadside ponds, PJ Spangler (2, USNM) . Uruguay: Colonia, Carmelo , 11 January 1962, C Morey, M Monne, CS Carbonell (3, FSCA) ; Montevideo, Pocitos , 01 November 1932, CS Carbonell (1, FSCA) ; Payeandu , Rio Uruguay, Barra Arroyo Guaviyu , 9–11 February 1970 (1, FSCA) .
VATELLUS WHEELERI MILLER SP. NOV.
( FIGS 189–202 View Figures 189–196 View Figures 197–202 , 314)
Type information: Holotype ♂ in USNM labelled, ‘ ARGENTINA, Chaco Rcho.Barrangueras Puerto Vilelas 5 December 1973 O. S. Flint, Jr ./ HOLOTYPE Vatellus wheeleri Miller 2004 [red label with double black line border].’
Paratypes: 6 in USNM labelled same as holotype. Argentina: Corr. Ituazingo , 20 December 1990, wet grassland UV, S & J Peck (12, CMNC) . Paraguay: Department Central , Asuncion, 2 October 1992, Dreschsel (3, LHIC) ; Department Guaira, Calle Florida , LHIC (2, LHIC) ; Department Guaira, Garay , 10 August 1992, U. Dreschsel (2, LHIC) ; Department Paraguari, Sapucay , 9 April, Dreschsel (1, LHIC) .
Type locality: Argentina, Chaco, Barranqueras.
Diagnosis: This species may be distinguished from other Vatellus by the following combination of characters: (1) dorsal and ventral surfaces distinctly alutaceous, elytral surface sculpture as in Figure 5 View Figures 2–7 ; (2) eyes large, protruding ( Fig. 189 View Figures 189–196 ); (3) transverse pronotal crease distinctive; (4) male pro- and mesobasotarsomeres ( Fig. 193 View Figures 189–196 ) much broader than in female ( Fig. 194 View Figures 189–196 ); (5) apical lobe on abdominal sternum VI present but weakly expressed ( Fig. 195 View Figures 189–196 ); (6) speleum long, anteriorly expanded, strongly curved dorsally ( Fig. 196 View Figures 189–196 ); and (7) male and female genitalia distinct ( Figs 197–202 View Figures 197–202 ). The median lobe is apically relatively broadly rounded in ventral aspect ( Figs 197, 199 View Figures 197–202 ), but not as truncated as in V. haagi . The gonocoxae in this species are more robust and strongly rounded than most species ( Fig. 201 View Figures 197–202 ). However, this species is very similar to V. mexicanus , V. lateralis and V. haagi and it appears that the shape of the speleum ( Fig. 196 View Figures 189–196 ) is its strongest diagnostic feature.
Description:
Habitus. Body outline moderately discontinuous in dorsal aspect, lateral margins of elytra moderately strongly rounded ( Fig. 189 View Figures 189–196 ), not dorsoventrally compressed. Measurements are given in Table 1.
Coloration. Head yellow-brown; pronotum dark brown, irregularly yellow anterolaterally; elytron dark brown to yellow-brown with yellow maculae subapically and laterally along margins ( Fig. 189 View Figures 189–196 ); venter and appendages dark red-brown.
Sculpture and structure. Head with punctation distinct, moderately coarse, absent to extremely fine and spares in large, triangular area on frons and clypeus, interpuncture surfaces smooth, shiny to slightly microreticulate, surface posterior to eyes alutaceous, rough; anterior clypeal margin rounded; eyes large, prominently protruding ( Fig. 189 View Figures 189–196 ). Pronotum densely punctate, but punctures obscured by alutaceous sculpturing similar to that shown in Figure 5 View Figures 2–7 , pale setae moderately long; pronotum cordate, lateral pronotal margin rounded anteriorly, broadest near anterior angles, posterior angles slightly obtuse ( Fig. 189 View Figures 189–196 ); lateral bead obscured; transverse sulcus moderately impressed, visible mainly laterally. Elytron with punctation dense but edges of punctures obscured by alutaceous sculpturing as on pronotum, light setae moderately dense and conspicuous. Prosternum short, shagrined, lightly setose; prosternal process broad, lateral margins rounded, basomedially slightly tectiform, medially excavated, apex flattened, sharply triangular, acuminate to slightly obtusely pointed. Metasternum with punctation dense laterally, punctures large and shallow, somewhat obscured by alutaceous sculpturing; anteromedial margin narrowly produced ventrally, apex acute. Abdominal sternal sutures not unusually modified; sterna with punctation dense over entire lateral surface, finer medially, obscured by alutaceous sculpturing; sixth abdominal sternum with apical lobe moderately produced, rounded, somewhat flattened; speleum broad, distinctly expanded, apex dorsally hooked dorsally ( Fig. 196 View Figures 189–196 ). Metacoxae with lateral portion densely punctate over entire surface, punctures shallow, somewhat obscured by alutaceous sculpturing; metacoxal lines strongly approximate posteriorly, strongly divergent anteriorly ( Fig. 191 View Figures 189–196 ); medial portion moderately punctate, punctures finely setose. Metatrochanter strongly rounded, offset ( Fig. 192 View Figures 189–196 ); metatarsal claws minutely dentate.
Male genitalia. Median lobe in lateral aspect slightly and evenly curved throughout length, slender, basal portion elongate, relatively straight and narrow, slightly narrowed subapically ( Fig. 198 View Figures 197–202 ); apex narrowly rounded, with numerous short spines subapically on ventral margin ( Fig. 197 View Figures 197–202 ); in ventral aspect moderately broad basally, narrower in apical twothirds, apically broadly pointed ( Figs 197, 199 View Figures 197–202 ). Lateral lobe with apical portion slightly and evenly curved, apex broadly rounded, with large apical and lateral region of long, fine setae; long, stout, subapical setae absent ( Fig. 200 View Figures 197–202 ).
Female genitalia. Gonocoxosternite moderately broad, apical angle rounded, anterior margin deeply curved, anterior lobe elongate, moderately broad, sinuate ( Fig. 201 View Figures 197–202 ). Gonocoxa short, broad and robust, apex broadly rounded, apodeme short and slender ( Fig. 201 View Figures 197–202 ). Bursa copulatrix broad, irregular ( Fig. 201 View Figures 197–202 ); spermathecal duct long, narrow; receptacle large, subequal in size to spermatheca, spherical ( Fig. 201 View Figures 197–202 ); intermediate duct broad, curved, strongly curved ( Fig. 202 View Figures 197–202 ); spermatheca spherical, large; fertilization duct large, abruptly and broadly expanded ( Fig. 201 View Figures 197–202 ).
Sexually dimorphic characters. Male with welldeveloped, elongate cup-shaped brush of setae on mesofemora and mesotrochanter with dense region of setae; male pro- and mesobasotarsomeres ( Fig. 193 View Figures 189–196 ) much broader than in female ( Fig. 194 View Figures 189–196 ), female protarsomere III ( Fig. 194A View Figures 189–196 ) longer than male protarsomere III ( Fig. 193A View Figures 189–196 ).
Natural history: This species has been collected from a UV light in wet grassland.
Distribution: Vatellus wheeleri is known from southern South America and has been collected from Argentina and Paraguay (Fig. 314).
Phylogenetic relationships: This species is part of the clade containing species similar to V. mexicanus ( Fig. 316 View Figures 315–316 ). However, within this group this species does not have clear affinities with any other particular species.
Etymology: This species is named in honour of Quentin D. Wheeler (The Natural History Museum, London) for his considerable contribution to taxonomic theory and knowledge of Coleoptera , for his extensive support of me during various research projects and for his highly valued friendship.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Vatellus lateralis
Miller, Kelly B. 2005 |
Macrovatellus deplanatus
Tremouilles ER 1995: 27 |
Zimmermann A 1920: 30 |
Zimmermann A 1919: 125 |
Macrovatellus lateralis Sharp, 1882b: 283
Tremouilles ER 1995: 27 |
Zimmermann A 1920: 30 |
Sharp D 1882: 283 |
Macrovatellus rudis
Tremouilles ER 1995: 27 |
Zimmermann A 1920: 30 |
Sharp D 1882: 283 |
Macrovatellus marginalis
Tremouilles ER 1995: 27 |
Zimmermann A 1920: 30 |
Sharp D 1882: 284 |
Macrovatellus haagi
Tremouilles ER 1995: 27 |
Zimmermann A 1920: 30 |
Zimmermann A 1919: 124 |
Regimbart M 1903: 46 |
Regimbart M 1899: 1 |
Sharp D 1882: 284 |
Vatellus haagi Wehncke, 1876: 357
Wehncke E 1876: 357 |