Eridanula, Fanti & Damgaard, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.10667579 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6B5ED1A9-FC34-4142-85AD-B35C73A427DE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10667619 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/282887DE-FFC5-FFBC-FCB5-EDC9FD3AA0C3 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Eridanula |
status |
gen. nov. |
Genus Eridanula n. gen.
Type species. Eridanula susannaebierae n. sp. The genus is at present monotypic.
Etymology. The genus name derives from Eridanos (Greek = Eridanσs; Latin = Eridanus), derived from Ancient Greek “HΡΙΔανός “ “Amber” + the Latin suffix -ula (diminutive) = small. This epithet refers to the name of the major river of Baltica: Fenno-Sarmatia (Eridanos River), which carried and deposed the Baltic amber ( Bijlsma 1981; Overeem et al. 2001; Gibbard & Lewin 2016). Gender: feminine.
Diagnosis. The unequal maxillary palpomeres, with the last segment securiform and the pronotum without modified lateral margins, places this new genus in the subfamily Cantharinae . Eridanula n. gen. is characterised by long elytra covering the abdomen; pronotum slightly longer than wide, with parallel lateral margins and narrower than elytra; head globular, very large, dorsally telescopic and with evident big eyes; claws simple without denticle (with a small denticle in the other related genera) and antennae with 17 articles: the antennomeres III-VIII dilated and slightly saucer-shaped (notably, the antennomere VIII is very saucer-shaped), the antennomere IX subquadrate and the other articles filiform and slightly enlarged (which is unknown in any extant and fossil genera).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |