Hyla elegans Wied, 1824
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/910.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/290287EF-FFA3-FFBD-8F0A-FB38FE43A2A0 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Hyla elegans Wied, 1824 |
status |
|
Hyla elegans Wied, 1824 View in CoL
Plate 51 and figure 28 View Fig (holotype)
1824 Isis : 671 (diagnosis).
1824 Abbildungen: Lief. 7 ( fig. 1 View Fig of composite pl.). 1825 Beitra¨ge: 529.
PRESENT STATUS: Hyla elegans Wied, 1824 .
REMARKS: This elegant little frog was diagnosed in the Isis of 1824 and illustrated in the Abbildungen, before being described in the Beitra¨ge. Wied saw this frog, sticking to leaves, at only one place. The type locality, given in the Abbildungen and Beitra¨ge, is Ponte do Gentio, Rio Alcobac¸a at 17 ° 309S, 39 ° 259W ( Vanzolini, 1992: 133).
The holotype, AMNH A-784 ( fig. 28 View Fig ), is in poor condition, having lost a large patch of dorsal skin and with limbs falling off ; it is a female with a large decomposed and solidified egg mass. A measurement in 2003 gave 30 mm SVL, essentially the same as Wied’s converted 29.3 mm.
As can be seen from figure 28 View Fig , the color pattern is virtually extinct. Duellman (1974: 18) probably inferred the existence of an ‘‘hourglass-shaped dark brown dorsal mark on a creamy tan ground color’’ more from the Abbildungen plate than from this very faded specimen. If the specimen is kept in alcohol and examined under a dissecting scope, with proper light adjustment, vestiges of several markings paler than adjacent skin can be discerned, as follow: (1) a pale triangular area atop the snout in front of eyes; (2) a broad pale dorsolateral stripe extends from the eye posteriad at least past midbody; (3) hint of a pale line atop tibia. These several pale areas are obviously remnants of the color pattern shown in plate 51. Ventrally, the skin at least of the belly is strongly granular, as indicated in the plate. The coloration of the preserved frog in the Abbildungen plate may have come from Wied’s field sketch of another specimen (thought by him to be a male) that he painted in life, perched on a leaf (colored inset in Bosch, 1991: 232).
This is species no. 298 in Wied’s 1860 manuscript catalog, where it is listed in one place (p. 50) as ‘‘ H. elegans Wied (? leucophyllata D.B.)’’ and in another place (p. 79) as ‘‘ Hyla elegans W ( H. leucophyllata Holbr. ?).’’ The species was synonymized with Hyla leucophyllata (Beireis) by Gu¨ nther (1858: 112), where it remained for a long time. Bertha Lutz (1973: 103) had examined the holotype at AMNH and, although she did not disturb the synonymy, she directly associated the name elegans with the ‘‘southern form’’ of leucophyllata , which she described in useful detail. 39 Caramaschi and Jim (1982) mentioned distinguishing characters and resurrected Wied’s Hyla elegans after more than 150 years of synonymy.
AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.