Basileuterus tristriatus chitrensis Griscom, 1927

LeCroy, Mary, 2013, Type Specimens Of Birds In The American Museum Of Natural History Part 11. Passeriformes: Parulidae, Drepanididae, Vireonidae, Icteridae, Fringillinae, Carduelinae, Estrildidae, And Viduinae, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2013 (381), pp. 1-155 : 15

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.1206/832.1
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4627481
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2B4687A0-9E0B-FFDC-FD66-764EFF331733
treatment provided by	Felipe
scientific name	Basileuterus tristriatus chitrensis Griscom
status

Treatment

Basileuterus tristriatus chitrensis Griscom View in CoL

Basileuterus tristriatus chitrensis Griscom, 1927a: 13 View in CoL (Chitrá (4000 ft), Veraguas, Pacific slope of western Panama).

Now Basileuterus tristriatus melanotis Lawrence, 1868 View in CoL . See Hellmayr, 1935: 491–492; Zimmer, 1949: 38; Blake, 1958: 561–562; Lowery and Monroe, 1968: 72; Wetmore et al., 1984: 314– 315; Dickinson, 2003: 767; Curson, 2010b: 795; and Lovette et al., 2010: 765–766.

HOLOTYPE: AMNH 257138 View Materials , adult male, collected at Chitra , 4000 ft, ca. 08.32N, 80.55W ( Siegel and Olson, 2008), Veraguas, western Panama, on 29 January 1926, by Rex R. Benson (no. 2055). GoogleMaps

COMMENTS: Griscom cited the AMNH number of the holotype in the original description and listed two males from Santa Fé and seven males (in addition to the type), seven females and three sex? from Chitra. Paratypes in AMNH are: Santa Fe´ : AMNH 187748 View Materials , 187749 View Materials , males, 7 and 8 April 1925, by Benson ; Chitra , AMNH 246437–246453 View Materials , seven males, seven females, three sex?, December-March 1926, by Benson. I did not find AMNH 246438 in the collection .

Hellmayr (1935: 491–492) and Zimmer (1949: 38) recognized both melanotis and chitrensis; Lowery and Monroe (1968: 72) omitted melanotis, not listing Costa Rica within the range of tristriatus ; Dickinson, 2003: 767) apparently followed Lowery and Monroe and omitted melanotis. Blake (1958: 560–561) questioned the distinctness of melanotis and chitrensis ‘‘in view of the variability apparent in a representative series of melanotis from Chiriquí’’; Wetmore et al. (1984: 314–315) considered chitrensis a synonym of melanotis and correctly used the older name, melanotis Lawrence, 1868; Curson (2010b: 795) said ‘‘ melanotis (described from Costa Rica) is treated as [a] synonyn of chitrensis,’’ but, of course, if the two forms are synonyms, melanotis is senior by nearly 60 years.