Coereba mexicana caucae Chapman

LeCroy, Mary, 2013, Type Specimens Of Birds In The American Museum Of Natural History Part 11. Passeriformes: Parulidae, Drepanididae, Vireonidae, Icteridae, Fringillinae, Carduelinae, Estrildidae, And Viduinae, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2013 (381), pp. 1-155 : 23

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.1206/832.1
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4611567
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2B4687A0-9E13-FFDB-FF04-76D2FC6A172D
treatment provided by	Felipe
scientific name	Coereba mexicana caucae Chapman
status

Treatment

Coereba mexicana caucae Chapman, 1914: 186 (Cali (alt. 3500 ft), Cauca Valley, Colombia).

Now Coereba flaveola caucae Chapman, 1914 . See Hellmayr, 1935: 299; Lowery and Monroe, 1968: 88; and Dickinson, 2003: 776; Hilty, 2011: 328–329.

HOLOTYPE: AMNH 109240 View Materials , adult male, collected at Cali , 3500 ft, 03.27N, 76.31W ( Paynter, 1997), Cauca Valley, Colombia, on 10 May 1911, by F.M. Chapman and W.B. Richardson. View Materials GoogleMaps

COMMENTS: Chapman cited the AMNH number of the holotype in the original description and based his description on 11 adult specimens from the Cauca Valley and the subtropical zone of the Western Andes. I could account for only nine of these specimens, including the holotype. The paratypes are: Cali , AMNH 71904 View Materials , female, undated, collected by Batty, AMNH 108478 View Materials , 108481 View Materials , 10848 View Materials 3, two males, one female, 20–27 December 1910, by Richardson ; Rio Frio , AMNH 112859 View Materials , 29 November 1911, by A.A. Allen and L.E. Miller ; San Antonio , AMNH 108480 View Materials , female, 24 January 1911, by Richardson ; Las Lomitas , AMNH 108479 View Materials , 108482 View Materials , males, 11 March and 28 February 1911, by Richardson. Of these, I did not find AMNH 108479 in the collection and AMNH 108482 View Materials was exchanged to BMNH in May 1921. Chapman questioned the inclusion of an immature specimen from Miraflores in caucae, and it is therefore not a paratype. That specimen is AMNH 109241 View Materials and is labeled as coming from E. of Palmira, but the field label indicates that it is from Mir [aflores]. See Chapman (1917b) for a description of the various AMNH expeditions to Colombia .