Chelonus (Microchelonus) recavus, Zhou & Achterberg & Tang & Chen, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5412.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DB6DD20F-6EB7-4152-AC80-2F67EE06684B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10676086 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2B5587AD-F04A-7331-FF39-6AA7FF29BE93 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chelonus (Microchelonus) recavus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Chelonus (Microchelonus) recavus sp. nov.
Figs 65–68 View FIGURE 65 View FIGURE 66 View FIGURE 67 View FIGURE 68
Material examined. Holotype: 1 female, Xiangtou Mt. , Guangdong Prov., China, 11.V.2004, Zaifu Xu, No. 20048105 ( ZJUH) . Paratypes: 2 males, same label data as holotype but Nos. 20048092, 20048100 .
Diagnosis. This new species is similar to C. (M.) depressus ( Thomson, 1874) sharing the medio-posterior depression of the metasomal carapace ( Fig. 66D View FIGURE 66 ), but the two species can be separated by the following characters: antenna of female as long as head and 0.5 mesosoma combined ( Fig. 66H View FIGURE 66 ) (versus slightly longer than head and mesosoma in C. (M.) depressus ); maximum height of metasomal carapace posteriorly ( Fig. 66D View FIGURE 66 ) (versus medially); 3 rd antennomere 2.2 × longer than wide ( Fig. 66H View FIGURE 66 ) (versus 3.0 ×).
Description. Holotype, male, length of body 3.0 mm, of fore wing 1.6 mm.
Head. Head transverse, width of head 2.2 × its dorsal length, occiput slightly excavated; antennomeres 16, antenna slightly widened medially, length of 3 rd and penultimate antennomeres 2.2 × and 1.4 × their width, respectively ( Fig. 66H View FIGURE 66 ); eye 1.3 × as long as temple in dorsal view; OOL: OD: POL= 15: 6: 11; temple parallel-sided behind eyes; vertex striate-rugulose; frons distinctly concave, smooth near antennal sockets ( Fig. 66G View FIGURE 66 ); face flat, concentric punctate-rugose; clypeus densely punctulate and shiny, width of face 1.8 × its height; eyes slightly converging ventrally ( Fig. 66F View FIGURE 66 ).
Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.6 × its height; side of pronotum finely punctate, mesopleuron areolate-rugose ( Fig. 66B View FIGURE 66 ); notauli indistinct, mesoscutum evenly convex, densely alveolate-rugose; scutellum rugulose, shiny; scutellar suture comparatively deep, narrow, with carinae; propodeum coarsely rugose, tubercles small and weak ( Fig. 66C View FIGURE 66 ).
Wings. Vein r somewhat arched; marginal cell 0.5 × as long as pterostigma; pterostigma 2.8 × longer than wide; r: 3-SR: SR1=10: 11: 43; SR1 slightly curved outwards; marginal cell 1.8 × longer than submarginal cell; 1-CU1: 2-CU1=6: 18; 2-R1 absent ( Fig. 66A View FIGURE 66 ).
Legs. Hind coxa mainly smooth and shallowly punctate with dense setosity; length of hind femur, tibia and basitarsus 3.1 ×, 4.3 × and 4.3 × their maximum width, respectively; length of inner hind tibial spur 0.5 × hind basitarsus.
Metasoma. Length of carapace 2.2 × its maximum width in dorsal view, widest at middle, apically narrowed; carapace longitudinally -rugose up to basal 70%, rugulose apically ( Fig. 66E View FIGURE 66 ); carapace in lateral view 2.8 × longer than high, posterior height of metasoma 1.5 × its anterior height, medio-posteriorly with a depression in carapace in lateral view, apex of metasomal carapace slightly incurved ( Fig. 66D View FIGURE 66 ).
Colour. Body black; antenna brown but scapus yellowish; palpi light yellow; pterostigma dark brown; middle of wing and its veins medium dark brown, wing base and its veins light brown; legs almost entirely dark brown, but hind tibia with a wide pale yellowish ring basally; carapace with yellowish irregular edge band in basal 1/3.
Male. Antennomeres 23, antenna filiform, not widened medially; occiput excavated ( Fig. 68H View FIGURE 68 ); apex of metasomal carapace distinctly incurved ( Fig. 68D View FIGURE 68 ); apical aperture in posterior view large, nearly round and median process of aperture with vertical carina ( Fig. 68F View FIGURE 68 ); other characters as in female.
Biology. Unknown.
Distribution. China (Guangdong).
Etymology. Named after the medio-posterior depression of the carapace: “ recavus ” is Latin for arched inward, concave.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Microchelonus |