Bathynomus raksasa, Sidabalok & Wong & Ng, 2020
|
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.947.53906 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1A80132D-D679-49C0-90D1-069770305473 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/84D71359-90FB-4CC6-856F-B96402F23211 |
|
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:84D71359-90FB-4CC6-856F-B96402F23211 |
|
treatment provided by |
|
|
scientific name |
Bathynomus raksasa |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Bathynomus raksasa sp. nov. Figs 2 View Figure 2 , 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 , 5 View Figure 5
Material examined.
Holotype, male, 363 mm; Indonesia, Sunda Strait (between Sumatra and Java); 6°00.828'S, 104°49.428'E; 26 Mar. 2018; SJADES exped.; station CP 13, beam trawl 1259 m; MZB Cru.Iso 097. Paratype, female, 298 mm; Indonesia, Indian Ocean (East of Tinjil Island); 6°59.778'S, 105°55.224'E; 28 Mar. 2018; SJADES exped.; station CP 28, beam trawl 957 m; ZRC 2020.0015.
Comparative material.
Bathynomus giganteus A. Milne-Edwards, 1879 - 1 male, 354 mm; U.S.A., Virginia, 100 miles off Virginia Beach; 36.483N, 74.8W; 30 May 1962; 73 m depth; ZRC 2014.0837. Bathynomus doederleini Ortmann, 1894 - 6 males, 100, 120, 120, 128, 136, 145 mm; 7 females, 88, 90, 94, 130, 130, 138, 145 mm; 3 juveniles; Taiwan; AM P68684. 1 male, 125 mm; 1 female, 85 mm; 4 juveniles; Taiwan, Tashi port; 1990s; P. K. L. Ng leg.; deep-water; ZRC 1998.417. Bathynomus sp. - 1 subadult, not sexually mature, pereopod 7 not fully developed, 107 mm; Indonesia, Indian Ocean (East of Tinjil Island); 6°56.664'S, 105°55.315'E; 28 Mar. 2018; SJADES exped.; station CP 26, beam trawl 517 m; MZB Cru.Iso 098. 1 juvenile; Indonesia, Sunda Strait (between Tabuan Island and Sumatra); 5°45.126'S, 104°51.080'E; 25 Mar. 2018; SJADES exped.; station CP 08, beam trawl 442 m; ZRC 2020.0016. 2 juveniles, 60, 63 mm; Indonesia, Indian Ocean (Pelabuhan Ratu Bay); 7°01.116'S, 106°26.421'E; 3 Apr. 2018; SJADES exped.; station CP 55, beam trawl 379 m; ZRC 2020.0017.
Type-locality.
Indonesia, Sunda Strait: between Sumatra and Java, 06°00.828'S, 104°49.428'E.
Diagnosis.
Narrowly rounded clypeus apex (Fig. 2C View Figure 2 ); prominent longitudinal carina on clypeus (Fig. 2C View Figure 2 ); convex lateral margins of uropodal exopod and endopod (Fig. 3D, E View Figure 3 ); produced distolateral corners of uropodal exopod and endopod with acute tips (Fig. 3D, E View Figure 3 ); uropodal exopod with medium-length setal fringe (69%) (Fig. 3D, E View Figure 3 ); pleotelson 1.6 times wider than long with posterior margin medially concave (Fig. 2D View Figure 2 ); 11-13 spines on pleotelson (Fig. 2D View Figure 2 ).
Description of holotype male.
Body (Fig. 2A View Figure 2 ) 363 mm long, 155 mm wide at pereonite 5, length 2.3 times width. Head (Fig. 2B View Figure 2 ) with ridge above eyes discontinuous; clypeus (Fig. 2C View Figure 2 ) with prominent longitudinal carina, distal margins slightly concave, apex narrowly rounded.
Antenna 2 (Fig. 2A, E View Figure 2 ) flagellum extending to end of pleonite 2.
Pereopod 1 (Fig. 3A View Figure 3 ) ischium with 2 posteroproximal robust setae, 2 robust setae on posterodistal margin; merus with 4 short robust setae on anterodistal angle, posterior margin with 4 robust setae in proximal row and 2 robust setae in distal row; propodus length 2.3 times width, with 5 robust setae on posterior margin. Pereopod 2 (Fig. 3B, C View Figure 3 ) ischium with 3 robust setae on posterior margin and 2 robust setae on posterodistal margin; merus with 7 short robust setae on anterodistal angle, posteromedial margin with 3 robust setae in proximal row and 2 robust setae in distal row; propodus with 4 robust setae on posterior margin. Pereopod 7 coxa (Fig. 2F View Figure 2 ) distally attenuated, curved posteriorly.
Pleonite 3 (Fig. 2F View Figure 2 ) not extending beyond pleonite 5.
Uropod (Figs 2D View Figure 2 , 3D, E View Figure 3 ) not extending beyond pleotelson; peduncle with 3 robust setae; exopod and endopod with smooth lateral and distal margins; exopodal lateral margin convex with 10 robust setae along margin, setal fringe medium to continuous in length (69%), medial margin straight, distomedial corner rounded, distal margin convex with 5 robust setae, distolateral corner slightly produced, acute; endopodal lateral margin convex, distally sinuate, with 4 robust setae; medial margin straight; distomedial corner rounded; distal margin straight with 11 robust setae; distolateral corner produced, acute.
Pleotelson (Fig. 2D View Figure 2 ) broader than long, 1.6 times as wide as length, posterior margin medially concave, smooth (minute pores), conspicuous longitudinal carina on dorsal surface, with 11 distal and 2 lateral straight acute prominent spines along distal margin, without setae between spines, central distal spine simple.
Female.
Similar to male.
Variation.
Robust setae count on female as follows: exopodal lateral margin with 7-10 robust setae, distal margin with 4 or 5, endopodal lateral margin with 3-5 and distal margin with 8-10; pleotelson with 9 distal and 2 lateral straight acute prominent spines along distal margin.
Etymology.
The epithet is the Indonesian word " raksasa " for giant, alluding to its enormous size and the significance of the find. The name is used as a noun in apposition.
Remarks.
Bathynomus raksasa sp. nov. can be readily identified by its large size (330 mm on average), narrowly rounded clypeus apex, produced and acute distolateral corners of uropodal rami, wider rather than long pleotelson with medially concave posterior margin and the presence of 11-13 pleotelson spines. Bathynomus raksasa sp. nov. is the sixth “supergiant” species from the Indo-West Pacific and is one of the largest known members of the genus.
In general appearance, B. raksasa sp. nov. is most similar to B. giganteus and B. lowryi . All three are large, averaging 300 mm in length, possess a prominent longitudinal carina on the dorsal surface of the pleotelson and have acute spines on the distal margin of the pleotelson. The new species is closest to B. giganteus , sharing the relatively medium length of antenna 2 (reaching to between the posterior of pereonite 2 and anterior of pereonite 3), lateral and posterior shape of the uropodal exopod and endopod, and the pleotelson spine count. Bathynomus raksasa sp. nov., however, differs markedly from B. giganteus by its more conspicuous longitudinal carina on the clypeus ventral surface (Fig. 4A View Figure 4 ) (vs. less conspicuous in B. giganteus ; Fig. 4B View Figure 4 ), absence of a transverse carina on the anterior of the head (Fig. 4C View Figure 4 ) (vs. carina present in B. giganteus ; Fig. 4D View Figure 4 ), the relatively shorter uropodal endopod (0.12 total body length, Fig. 4E View Figure 4 ) (vs. relatively longer, 0.15 body length in B. giganteus ; Fig. 4F View Figure 4 ), the body surface, including that of the pleotelson, being covered with small low granules and smooth to the touch (Fig. 5A View Figure 5 ) (vs. granules more prominent and the surfaces distinctly rough in B. giganteus ; Fig. 5B View Figure 5 ), the almost flat posterior ventral surface of the pleotelson (Fig. 5C View Figure 5 ) (vs. surface distinctly concave in B. giganteus ; Fig. 5D View Figure 5 ), the straight spines of pleotelson (Fig. 5E View Figure 5 ) (vs. gently curved upwards in B. giganteus ; Fig. 5F View Figure 5 ), the pleotelson is broader than long (Fig. 5A View Figure 5 ) (vs. as long as broad in B. giganteus , Fig. 5B View Figure 5 ), and the posterior margin of the pleotelson is broad and medially concave (Fig. 5A View Figure 5 ) (vs. broadly rounded in B. giganteus , Fig. 5B View Figure 5 ). Bathynomus raksasa sp. nov. can easily be distinguished from B. lowryi in possessing a relatively longer antenna 2 which reaches to the ends of pereonite 2 (vs. shorter antenna 2 which reaches only to the anterior part of pereonite 2 in B. lowryi ), the narrowly rounded clypeus apex (vs. apex truncate in B. lowryi ), straight pleotelson spines (vs. spines upwardly curved in B. lowryi ) and the larger number (13) of robust setae on the pleotelson (vs. 9 in B. lowryi ) ( Bruce and Bussarawit 2004: figs 1, 6).
Bathynomus raksasa sp. nov. shares the same general uropodal exopod and endopod shape as B. crosnieri , B. kensleyi and B. richeri but can easily be distinguished from them in its possession of a conspicuous longitudinal carina on the dorsal surface of the pleotelson (Fig. 5A View Figure 5 ). Although the number of spines on the margin of the pleotelson (at least 11) is similar to those of B. crosnieri and B. richeri , the presence of the longitudinal ridge on the pleotelson easily separates B. raksasa sp. nov. from these species. Bathynomus raksasa sp. nov. also has the same number of spines on the margin of the pleotelson but can easily be distinguished from B. keablei in having the distolateral corners of the uropodal exopod and endopod distinctly produced (Fig. 3D, E View Figure 3 ) (vs. rounded and not produced in B. keablei ; see Lowry and Dempsey 2006: fig. 17).
The appendix masculina is absent on the holotype male of B. raksasa sp. nov. (Fig. 5G View Figure 5 ) but this is almost certainly not a species-character. It is known to be sometimes absent in B. doederleini from Taiwan (present study); with five out of seven males below the size of 130 mm lacking it. The largest males of B. doederleini (136-145 mm) possess appendix masculina. The absence or presence of appendix masculina has been previously used by Soong and Mok (1994) to determine the maturity of males of Bathynomus doederleini ; "mature males" were males with appendix masculina and "maturing males" were those without appendix masculina and testes. Barradas-Ortiz et al. (2003) reported that some adult males of B. giganteus from Brazil (mostly smaller specimens below 290 mm) lacked appendix masculina, especially in summer. They suggested that these smaller males might have been less reproductively active in summer and/or the appendix masculina may be a non-permanent organ which is lost or regrown when the animals moult ( Barradas-Ortiz et al. 2003). Barradas-Ortiz et al. (2003) also noted that larger male specimens of B. giganteus tend to keep the organ for longer periods than smaller ones, although even large individuals (310 mm) sometimes do not possess the structure. We cannot be certain that either of the patterns above apply to B. raksasa sp. nov. as only one male was collected. The appendix masculina (Fig. 5H View Figure 5 ) is present on the large male American specimen of B. giganteus (ZRC 2014.0837) examined here.
The SJADES cruise also obtained four juvenile and subadult specimens from southern Java (here identified as Bathynomus sp.) (Fig. 6 View Figure 6 ) which we are unable to identify to the species level, especially as the diagnostic characters may not be developed. They are clearly not Bathynomus raksasa sp. nov. with a different pleotelson spination, shapes of pleotelson and uropodal rami. The largest specimen in the lot (107 mm) has an almost fully-developed pereopod 7 which indicates that the adult would not be too much larger in size. This, along with the presence of setae between the pleotelson spines, suggest that this species belongs to the “giant” group. The number of spines on the posterior margin of the pleotelson ranges between 5+2, 7+2 and 9+2. Soong and Mok (1994) used the development of pereopod 7 as one of the characters to classify the development stages of Bathynomus doederleini . According to Soong and Mok (1994), individuals with "small, white" pereopod 7 and lacking either oostegites or penes and/or appendix masculina were categorised as "subadult I" which equals to stage 2 of five development stages they proposed. However, we will not apply this approach to Bathynomus sp. because of the limited specimen number.
Bathynomus sp. superficially resembles the poorly known Bathynomus affinis Richardson, 1910, described from the Philippines from one specimen. There is, however, a problem with what has been identified as " Bathynomus affinis " by Lowry and Dempsey (2006: 169, figs 2, 3), who listed among their material, the type from the Philippines as well as two females from the Arafura Sea, providing figures of the latter. Bruce (1986: fig. 87A-E) had earlier figured the uropods, and pereopods 1 and 3 of the type specimen (sex not specified). The problem is that the distolateral corners of uropodal rami of the holotype from the Philippines is distinctly acute and curved ( Bruce 1986: fig. 87A-C) whereas that of Lowry and Dempsey (2006: fig. 3D, E) from the Arafura Sea is distinctly wider and not produced. Significantly, Richardson’s (1910: fig. 1) figures of the uropods are the same as those by Bruce (1986). The material from Arafura Sea are thus unlikely to be B. affinis s. str.
Our material of Bathynomus sp. from Java resembles the " B. affinis " of Lowry and Dempsey (2006) in possessing the same relative length of antenna 2 (reaching between pereonites 3 and 4), straight clypeus distal margins, the setal fringe on the uropodal exopod is long and continuous ( ± 90%), and similar pleotelson spine count (5+2, 7+2 and 9+2). The marked difference in the form of the uropodal endopod distolateral corner, however, indicates they are not conspecific. In addition, the uropod of Bathynomus sp. reaches to the end of the pleotelson (Fig. 6D View Figure 6 ) (vs. slightly extended beyond the pleotelson; Lowry and Dempsey 2006: fig. 2F) and the pleotelson central spine is weakly bifid (Fig. 6C View Figure 6 ) (vs. simple; Lowry and Dempsey 2006: fig. 2F). The uropods of our material from Java agree very well with the figures by Richardson (1910) and Bruce (1986), but until a complete redescription of the holotype of B. affinis is done and more character states are known, we are not certain if they are actually conspecific.
Bathynomus sp. differs from B. pelor Bruce, 1986 (from northwestern Australia) in having a longer antenna 2 that reaches to the middle of pereonite 4 (Fig. 6E View Figure 6 ) (vs. middle of pereonite 2; Bruce 1986: fig. 91A), weakly bifid pleotelson central spine (Fig. 6C View Figure 6 ) (vs. strongly bifid; Bruce 1986: fig. 91B), and the conspicuous longitudinal carina on the pleotelson (Fig. 6D View Figure 6 ) (vs. inconspicuous; Bruce 1986: fig. 91C). Both species share similar shape of uropodal rami with more acute and curved distolateral corner on the endopod of Bathynomus sp. (Fig. 6A, B View Figure 6 ) (vs. less acute and curved; Bruce 1986: fig. 91D). It differs from B. immanis Bruce, 1986, in the slightly concave lateral of uropodal exopod (Fig. 6A, B View Figure 6 ) (vs. strongly concave; Bruce 1986: fig. 90C, D), greater length of fringing setae ( ± 80%) on the lateral uropod exopod (Fig. 6A, B View Figure 6 ) (vs. 66%; Bruce 1986: fig. 90C, D) and the weakly bifid pleotelson central spine (Fig. 6C View Figure 6 ) (vs. simple; Bruce 1986: fig. 89 D). The two species together with B. doederleini share similar uropodal endopod shapes (Fig. 6A, B View Figure 6 ).
Bathynomus sp. shares with B. kapala Griffin, 1975 (from Australia) a similar bifid central pleotelson spine but can easily be distinguished by its relatively longer antenna 2 (Fig. 6E View Figure 6 ) (middle of pereonite 4 vs. within pereonite 3; Lowry and Dempsey 2006: fig. 14 C), the straight head ridge (Fig. 6F View Figure 6 ) (vs. curved; Lowry and Dempsey 2006: fig. 14 D), a narrowly rounded clypeus apex (6G) (vs. broadly rounded; Lowry and Dempsey 2006: fig. 14 E), with only one row of fringing setae on the anterior margin of the basis of pereopod 7 (Fig. 6H View Figure 6 ) (vs. with two rows; Lowry and Dempsey 2006: fig. 23 F) and the uropodal endopod distolateral margin is subacute and only slightly produced (Fig. 6A, B View Figure 6 ) (vs. not produced; Lowry and Dempsey 2006: fig. 15 D, E).
Compared to B. doederleini , Bathynomus sp. has pereopod 7 coxa more slender (Fig. 6I View Figure 6 ) (vs. relatively broader; Lowry and Dempsey 2006: fig. 10B), there is one row of fringing setae on the anterior margin of the basis of pereopod 7 (Fig. 6H View Figure 6 ) (vs. with two rows; Lowry and Dempsey 2006: fig. 23D), and the lengths of the pleotelson spines are similarly sized (Fig. 6D View Figure 6 ) (vs. uneven; Lowry and Dempsey 2006: fig. 10F).
Distribution.
Sunda Strait and Indian Ocean, South Java, Indonesia; at depths of 957-1259 m.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.