Erythria

Guglielmino, Adalgisa, Poggi, Francesco & Bückle, Christoph, 2011, Contribution to the knowledge on Typhlocybinae (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae) in Italy with description of two new species, Zootaxa 2979, pp. 41-59 : 42-46

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.203776

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6193314

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2D4B87A9-FFD7-F84B-FF2B-5343D1BAFB80

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Erythria
status

 

1) Erythria View in CoL ferrarii-alpina complex

( Figs 1–4 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 )

Material examined. CG: Toscana (Firenze), Passo di Raticosa; 900m; 5/9/2006 (328); herbaceous vegetation; Guglielmino & Bückle leg.; 4 males, 1 female.—Emilia-Romagna (Modena): Monte Cimone, Sestola, 1km north of Pian del Falco; ~ 1300m; 3/9/2007 (404); herbaceous vegetation on the forest margins; Guglielmino & Bückle leg.; 5 males, 4 females.—Liguria (Genova): M. Maggiorasca, Passo Tomarlo, road to Foresta Penna ca. 1km south of fork from SP 81; ~ 1400m; 20.08.2008 (439); meadows surrounded by beech forest; Guglielmino & Bückle leg.; 23 males, 21 females.—Emilia-Romagna (Piacenza): M. Maggiorasca, SP 81 800m west of Passo Zovallo; ~ 1450m; 20.08.2008 (440); meadows within beech and fir forest; Guglielmino & Bückle leg.; 6 males, 3 females.— Lombardia (Pavia): Brallo di Pregola, Cima della Colletta, western slope; 1400–1493m; 22.08.2008 (445); mountain meadows between beech forest; Guglielmino & Bückle leg.; 18 males, 10 females.—Lombardia (Pavia): Brallo di Pregola, Cima della Colletta, rifugio; ~ 1400m; 23.08.2008 (446); meadows; Guglielmino & Bückle leg.; 1 male.—Emilia-Romagna (Piacenza): M. Lesima, road Cima della Colletta – Passo di Giove 900m east of the pass; ~ 1400m; 23.08.2008 (447); undergrowth of beech forest with Sesleria , Clematis and open meadow with Poaceae ; Guglielmino & Bückle leg.; 3 males, 6 females.—Liguria (Imperia): near S. Bernardo di Conio; 1000m; 29/8/2000 (E); meadow with Betula , Populus , Salix , Corylus ; Guglielmino & Bückle leg.; 14 males, 6 females.— Liguria (Imperia): Passo di Teglia; 1400m; 29/8/2000 (F); mountain pasture with Corylus , Alnus incana , Pinus and ferns; Guglielmino & Bückle leg.; 2 males, 2 females.—Liguria (Imperia): north of Mendatica; 1000m; 30/8/2000 (G); mixed forest with Pinus , Alnus glutinosa , Salix ; Guglielmino & Bückle leg.; 4 males, 2 females.

CP: Toscana (Firenze): Marradi: Albero; 500m; 20.09.1997; F. Poggi leg.; 5 males, 7 females.—Toscana (Firenze): dintorni Marradi; 500m; 24.09.1997; F. Poggi leg.; 5 males, 6 females.

(The locality numbers or letters in parenthesis coincide with the number system used by Guglielmino and Bückle in their faunistic and zoogeographic papers).

E. ferrarii View in CoL was described by Puton (1877) based on material collected at Stazzano (Piemonte), in the mountains north of Genova ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A). Ribaut (1936) established the genus Erythridea , later regarded by Dworakowska (1971a) as subgenus, for this brachypterous Erythria View in CoL species. Dworakowska (1977), after a detailed discussion about the whole genus Erythria View in CoL , recommended abandoning Erythridea also at the subgenus level. In 1952 Ribaut recorded E. ferrarii View in CoL from the French Maritime Alps (Var). Vidano (1959), in his excellent revision of the genera Erythria View in CoL and Erythridea , mentions E. ferrarii View in CoL localities in the province of Savona, and later ( Vidano 1965) added further records from Liguria and Toscana. Zangheri (1966) recorded the species from Emilia Romagna (but see below) and Servadei (1967) from Veneto. Old records from Trentino ( Then 1886) and Austria ( Melichar 1896) need to be confirmed. Dworakowska (1977) recorded E. ferrarii View in CoL specimens from “ Austria, Tirol, Horvath’s collection”, but the indication “Tirol” may refer also to the southern part, nowadays as “Alto Adige”, a part of Italy.

E. alpina was described by Vidano (1959), as Erythridea alpina , from Forno Alpi Graie (Piemonte) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 B). For many years this species was found exclusively in Piemonte in the alpine regions northwest of Torino ( Vidano 1959, 1965). Dworakowska (1977) mentioned E. alpina from Trentino (Rovereto) and from Emilia Romagna, the latter based on material of the Zangheri collection (Castelraniero, Faenza) which previously was published by Zangheri himself (1966) as E. ferrarii View in CoL (det. Ribaut). Recently, specimens at least very closely related to E. alpina were recorded from Toscana (Passo di Raticosa, Guglielmino & Bückle, 2008).

During our research on the Auchenorrhyncha fauna of Italy, we collected many specimens of several populations of brachypterous Erythria View in CoL in the northern Apennines between western Liguria (Province of Imperia) and northern Toscana (Province of Firenze) ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ). The populations from the Maritime Alps (A–C in Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ) include specimens with the aedeagus shaft completely without or only with slight gibbosity and diverging or rather parallel thin subapical appendages ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 A–C), corresponding more or less to the figures in Ribaut (1936) and in Vidano (1959) for E. ferrarii View in CoL . Within the same population we observe only very little variability. In the other localities east of the Maritime Alps (D–M in Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ), however, our results are more or less confusing: the collected material displays a conspicuous variability in aedeagal morphology, sometimes among specimens of the same population, in some cases to a degree that renders species identification quite difficult. This variability concerns all the characters used by Vidano in his identification key for the two brachypterous Erythria View in CoL species E. ferrarii View in CoL and E. alpina View in CoL : the shape of the aedeagus shaft and shape and direction of the subapical appendages. While the shape of the aedeagus shaft (in lateral view) is highly variable in nearly all regions, also within the same population (with distinct gibbosity, spinelike protuberance or evenly curved), the shape of the subapical appendages (to a minor degree their direction) seems to be more or less constant among specimens of the same population.

Near the type locality of E. ferrarii View in CoL , at Cima della Colletta in the Monte Lesima region (D in Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ), occur specimens with, in respect of those of the Maritime Alps, somewhat wider and distinctly converging aedeagus appendages ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 D) and thus resembling to some degree E. alpina View in CoL ; whereas on Monte Maggiorasca (E,F in Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ) populations with rather typical E. ferrarii View in CoL specimens ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 E, 3F) like those of the Maritime Alps are found. Proceeding in eastern direction we find on M. Cimone (G in Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ) specimens ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 G) similar to those from Cima della Colletta. Finally in the southeasternmost region (Passo di Raticosa and Marradi, H–M in Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ) a wide spectrum between almost typical ferrarii View in CoL and alpina View in CoL specimens on the one side and many transitional forms on the other ( Figs 4 View FIGURE 4 H–M) is observed.

We studied type material of E. alpina View in CoL and some further specimens collected near the type locality of that species (Alpi Graie). In this material we find only slight variability: all specimens present a prominent aedeagus shaft gibbosity and large, converging crenulate subapical appendages corresponding to the figures in Vidano (1959) for E. alpina View in CoL .

To explain the situation we assume that populations of the common ancestors of both species became isolated during a period of glaciation, and evolved their different " alpina View in CoL "- and " ferrarii View in CoL "-characters respectively. Later they acquired locally, due to climatic changes, a new contact with each other before having created a complete mating barrier. Thus the high variability, above all in the southeastern area (Tuscan-Emilian Apennines), may be explained by different degrees of hybridization between both taxa in that region.

The specific topography of the mountain regions in Northwestern Italy with their many valleys and mountain chains and only a narrow mountainous corridor connecting the Alps with the Northern Apennines may have favoured isolation of Erythria View in CoL populations and subsequent speciation. The ecology of both species (and probably already of their common ancestor), which live on herbaceous plants near the ground on forest margins or in open forests and, above all, their poor dispersal ability due to their reduced wings (an extremely rare character in Typhlocybinae View in CoL ), may also have played an important part. Also, macropterous Erythria View in CoL species display more or less similar ecological preferences, and live in some cases in a restricted area (e.g. E. cisalpina Dworakowska View in CoL , known from Trentino Alto Adige, E. pedemontana Vidano View in CoL from Maritime Alps and Switzerland, or E. pyrenaea Remane & Della Giustina View in CoL from French Pyrenees). They may be regarded as model for the macropterous common ancestor of E. ferrarii View in CoL and E. alpina View in CoL , for which the subsequent loss of flying ability had no substantial negative impact on its fitness.

In addition, we mention the well known case of two other Typhlocybinae View in CoL species Zyginidia pullula (Boheman) View in CoL and Z. ribauti Dworakowska , which form in Piemonte, Liguria and Emilia Romagna a large hybrid area with a high diversity of transitional forms in their genital characters (see Mazzoglio & Arzone 1993; Mazzoglio et al. 2009).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Cicadellidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF