Paratranes Zimmerman, 1994
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.767.1493 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7BE2FA83-2717-4BE9-A540-F98BFAF5F7E1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5514575 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/311F2D1B-FFCD-FF9A-0B72-522FFB539DF6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Paratranes Zimmerman, 1994 |
status |
|
Genus Paratranes Zimmerman, 1994 View in CoL
Figs 1–10 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig
Paratranes Zimmerman, 1994: 695 View in CoL .
Paratranes View in CoL – Oberprieler 1995: 306; 2004: 183 (classification, host associations). — Alonso-Zarazaga & Lyal 1999: 210 (catalogue); 2014: 560 (classification, host associations). — Oberprieler & Caldara 2012: 57 (classification, host associations). — Pullen et al. 2014: 289 (catalogue). — Anderson et al. 2018: 2 (classification, host associations). — Legalov 2018: 345 (key, catalogue, classification).
Type species
Tranes monopticus Pascoe, 1870 View in CoL , by monotypy.
Redescription
Body slender and depressed, completely shiny black; pronotal and elytral derm nearly nude, covered with very short setae ( Fig. 1A View Fig ). Rostrum moderately long, equally long in both sexes ( Fig. 4 View Fig ). Eyes dorsally well separated ( Fig. 1C View Fig ); ventrally very narrowly separated, as narrowly as procoxae ( Fig. 1B View Fig ); forehead slightly narrower than basal width of rostrum ( Fig. 1C View Fig ). Antennae inserted at about distal third of rostrum in both sexes, not sexually dimorphic ( Fig. 4 View Fig ); funicles 7-segmented but segment 7 closely approximated to club and nearly continuous in outline with it, segments 1 and 2 short, 2 slightly longer or as long as apical width of scape and slightly shorter than segments 3+4 ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); clubs stout and short, distinctly shorter than funicles, 4-segmented, with small conical apical segment, appearing 5-segmented due to funicle segment 7 being closely approximated to basal club segment. Pronotum distinctly narrower than elytra at humeri, with sides weakly to moderately arcuate ( Fig. 3 View Fig ); surface punctate, punctures separate on disc but confluent and vague laterally ( Fig. 1D View Fig ). Elytra elongate, jointly ca 0.5–0.6× as broad as long, sides subparallel or slightly diverging apicad, subapically slightly indented ( Fig. 2A View Fig ); surface nearly flat ( Figs 3–4 View Fig View Fig ). Prothorax with anterior margin laterally extended into weak ocular lobes ventrally separated by shallow emargination ( Fig. 1B View Fig ); prosternum before procoxal cavities impunctate or sparsely punctate medially; procoxal cavities confluent, with procoxae contiguous; metanepisterna without sclerolepidia. Femora distinctly sulcate beneath; meso- and metatibiae with distal setal combs continued around apex and extending to almost middle of tibia ( Fig. 2B View Fig ), metatibiae with dorso-apical corner rounded. Terminalia: tergite VII of female subtrapezoidal ( Fig. 2C View Fig ), with posterior margin subtruncate, anterior margin ca 1.5–1.9× as wide as posterior margin; tergite VIII of male subquadratic ( Fig. 2D View Fig ), with posterior margin subtruncate, of female subtrapezoidal ( Fig. 7A, C View Fig ), very long in P. monopticus , ca 0.9–1.8 × as long as width at anterior margin, posterior margin subtruncate, anterior margin ca 1.4–1.5 × as wide as posterior margin; sternite VIII of female with sclerotised parts of apical lobes slender, linear ( Fig. 7B, D View Fig ); tegmen with oval to rounded ring ( Fig. 7I–J View Fig ), manubrium distinctly shorter than parameroid lobes; penis subparallel ( Fig. 8 View Fig ), dorsum strongly sclerotised at both sides, forming a broad median groove, apical margin roundly subtruncate or slightly medially emarginate, body distinctly shorter than temones (ca 2.0–3.0 ×); endophallus ( Fig. 8A–B, D–E View Fig ) membranous, long, extending below body of penis, apically with anchor-shaped symmetrical armature composed of two strongly hooked sclerites joined medially to form a common stalk ( Fig. 9A–D View Fig ); ovipositor short ( P. zimmermani sp. nov.) to long ( P. monopticus ), ca 1.5–5.7 × as long as wide, proximal gonocoxite ca 0.8–1.4 × as long as distal gonocoxite ( Fig. 10A–B View Fig ), gonostyli subapical, broad, apically truncate, with few long setae.
Remarks
Paratranes is here classified in the tribe Orthorhinini , following Anderson et al. (2018), who included the Tranes group in this tribe based on the strongly supported relationship between Tranes Schoenherr, 1843 and the orthorhinine genus Vanapa Pouillaude, 1915 found by Shin et al. (2017) in a robust phylogenetic analysis of 522 protein-coding genes. Without considering these results, Legalov (2018) recently proposed a separate tribe for the Tranes group, Tranini (incorrectly formed as ‘Tranesini’; see Hsiao & Oberprieler (2020)), but his diagnosis of Tranini did not distinguish the group from Orthorhinini , and it further contained characters not present in all the included genera. Pending further and more detailed analysis of the phylogenetic relationships of the Tranes group, it is premature to afford it tribal status in Molytinae .
The relationships of Paratranes to the other genera of the Tranes group also remain uncertain for the moment. It agrees with Tranes , Miltotranes Zimmerman, 1994 and Howeotranes Zimmerman, 1994 in lacking sclerolepidia along its metanepisternal sutures, which are present in Demyrsus Pascoe, 1872 and Siraton Hustache, 1934 ( Oberprieler & Caldara 2012; Lyal 2014; Hsiao & Oberprieler 2020), but how closely related it may be to the cycad-associated genera, Tranes and Miltotranes , is as yet unknown. The similarity of the anchor-shaped sclerite of the endophallus in Paratranes and Tranes lyterioides (Pascoe, 1875) suggests a close relationship between these taxa and that Tranes in its current concept may be nonmonophyletic. The taxonomy of Tranes is currently under investigation (unpubl. data 2020).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Paratranes Zimmerman, 1994
Hsiao, Yun & Oberprieler, Rolf G. 2021 |
Paratranes
Anderson R. S. & Oberprieler R. G. & Setliff G. P. 2018: 2 |
Legalov A. A. 2018: 345 |
Pullen K. R. & Jennings D. & Oberprieler R. G. 2014: 289 |
Oberprieler R. G. & Caldara R. 2012: 57 |
Oberprieler R. G. 2004: 183 |
Alonso-Zarazaga M. A. & Lyal C. H. C. 1999: 210 |
Oberprieler R. G. 1995: 306 |
Paratranes
Zimmerman E. C. 1994: 695 |