Vipio abnormis, Li & He & Chen, 2020

Li, Yang, He, Jun-Hua & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2020, Review of six genera of Braconinae Nees (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) in China, with the description of eleven new species, Zootaxa 4818 (1), pp. 1-74 : 60-63

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4818.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:66ABE334-716A-420A-B7E7-72025C273DE9

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6493647

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3137517C-FFF8-FC38-FF60-F8E5FDB56354

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Vipio abnormis
status

sp. nov.

Vipio abnormis sp. nov.

Figs 47–48

Type material. Holotype. ♀, China, Neimenggu Prov., Houqi , 20.VI.1981, Huang Xuchang, No. 816131 ( ZJUH) . Paratype: 1♀, China, Neimenggu Prov., Zhongqi , 15. VI .1981, Huang Xuchang, No. 816130 ( ZJUH) .

Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to Vipio mongolicus Telenga, 1936 , but can be separated from the latter by the following characters: lateral grooves of first tergite smooth (crenulate in V. mongolicus ); second metasomal tergite approx. 0.9 × longer than wide (1.1–1.2 × longer than wide); second metasomal tergite without triangular medio-basal area (with well-developed triangular medio-basal area).

Description. Holotype, ♀, length of body 9.0 mm, of fore wing 7.5 mm, of ovipositor sheath 19.5 mm.

Head. Antenna incomplete, remaining part with 49 antennomeres; median flagellomeres 1.0 × as long as its width; first flagellomere 1.3 and 1.4 × longer than second and third, respectively, the latter being 1.4 × longer than wide; malar suture with some short setae and weak sculptures ( Fig. 48g View FIGURE 48 ); clypeus height: inter-tentorial distance: tentorio-ocular distance = 8: 15: 12; clypeus with two groups of bristles submedially; eye not emarginated ( Fig. 48g View FIGURE 48 ); face largely smooth, but with sparse weak punctures and some long setae laterally ( Fig. 48g View FIGURE 48 ); eye height: shortest distance between eyes: head width = 22: 35: 58; frons largely smooth except for a few weak punctures, weakly concave behind antennal sockets, with a shallow median groove ( Fig. 48h View FIGURE 48 ); vertex largely smooth, with a few short setae; shortest distance between posterior ocelli: shortest diameter of elliptical posterior ocellus: shortest distance between posterior ocellus and eye = 4: 3: 8; temples linearly narrowed behind eyes ( Fig. 48h View FIGURE 48 ).

Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.6 × its height ( Fig. 48c View FIGURE 48 ); notauli rather shallow posteriorly ( Fig. 48d View FIGURE 48 ); mesoscutum smooth and sparsely short setose posteriorly ( Fig. 48d View FIGURE 48 ); scutellar sulcus deep, moderately narrow, with crenulae ( Fig. 48d View FIGURE 48 ); scutellum smooth, with some short setae posteriorly; metanotum moderately convex medially ( Fig. 48d View FIGURE 48 ); propodeum largely smooth, without medio-longitudinal carina or groove, and sparsely setose medially, with dense long setae laterally ( Fig. 48d View FIGURE 48 ).

Wings. Fore wing ( Fig. 48a View FIGURE 48 ): SR1: 3-SR: r = 28: 26: 5; 1-SR+M nearly straight after arising from 1-M, 1.3 × longer than 1-M; 2-SR: 3-SR: r-m = 13: 26: 14; vein SR1 reaching wing margin approx. half-way between pterostigma and wing tip; cu-a more or less interstitial. Hind wing ( Fig. 48b View FIGURE 48 ): SC+R1: 2-SC+R: 1r-m = 23: 5: 18.

Legs. Length of fore femur: tibia: tarsus = 31: 37: 45; length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 44: 65: 23; length of hind basitarsus 5.1 × its maximum width.

Metasoma. First tergite as long as its apical width, median area oval and convex ( Fig. 48j View FIGURE 48 ); first tergite largely smooth except for lateral carinae, sparse crenulae of lateral grooves ( Fig. 48j View FIGURE 48 ); second tergite 0.9 × as long as its wide, weakly elevated medio-basally, but not forming a medio-basal area, and with developed antero-lateral areas; oblique anterior grooves of second tergite deep and sparsely crenulate; second tergite smooth except for crenulate anterior grooves ( Fig. 48e View FIGURE 48 ); second suture deep, crenulate, curved and wide medially ( Fig. 48e View FIGURE 48 ); third tergite 0.6 × as long as wide, without antero-lateral areas ( Fig. 48e View FIGURE 48 ); third–seventh tergites smooth ( Fig. 48e View FIGURE 48 ); hypopygium acute apically, reaching far beyond level of apex of metasoma; ovipositor sheath 2.6 × as long as fore wing.

Colour. Largely yellow ( Fig. 47); antenna, mandible apically, area around ocelli, lateral lobes of mesoscutum, metapleuron ventrally and ovipositor sheaths black ( Figs 47, 48c, 48d, 48g, 48h View FIGURE 48 ); claws, hind tibia apically and hind tarsus dark brown ( Fig. 48f View FIGURE 48 ); wing membrane infuscate, but fore wing with pale stripes around veins 1-SR+M, 2-SR+M, m-cu, 2-CU1 apically, 3-CU1 and r-m, pterostigma (except for yellow basal patch) and veins dark brown ( Figs 48a, 48b View FIGURE 48 ).

Variation. Length of body of female 8.5–9.0 mm, of fore wing of female 7.0– 7.5 mm, and of ovipositor sheath 15.5–19.5 mm; antenna of female with 56 antennomeres; apical flagellomere 1.8 × longer than its maximum width; length of mesosoma 1.6–1.8 × its height; second metasomal tergite more or less flattened medio-basally; second suture moderately shallow and weakly crenulate; ovipositor sheath 2.2–2.6 × as long as fore wing.

Biology. Unknown.

Distribution. China (Nei Menggu).

Etymology. Named after the abnormal second metasomal tergite (lacking a medio-basal area): “abnormis” is Latin for “deviating from the rule”.

VI

Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Braconidae

Genus

Vipio

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF