Corallizoanthus Reimer

Swain, Timothy D. & Swain, Laura M., 2014, Molecular parataxonomy as taxon description: examples from recently named Zoanthidea (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) with revision based on serial histology of microanatomy, Zootaxa 3796 (1), pp. 81-107: 84-85

publication ID

http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3796.1.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:66323922-2C76-4AB7-98E6-59205AF86DBA

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/32546E5C-A532-FFEE-FF52-F8A9E2ACF9B5

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Corallizoanthus Reimer
status

 

Genus Corallizoanthus Reimer  in Reimer, Nonaka, Sinniger & Iwase, 2008

Type species. Corallizoanthus tsukaharai Reimer  in Reimer, Nonaka, Sinniger & Iwase, 2008, by original designation.

Diagnosis. Parazoanthidae  (?) associated with Alcyonacea  and lacking scleroprotein skeleton (diagnosis of Reimer et al. 2008 a). Known from temperate regions at 194–1763 m. Azooxanthellate. Polyps white to yellow, expand to 7.7 mm wide and 12 mm long, with 11–14 capitular ridges. Marginal musculature cyclically transitional, 323–793 Μm in length, composed of 9–32 attachment points. Encrustations of the column to the center of mesoglea (diagnosis expanded using data presented here and Swain 2010).

Remarks. Creation of Corallizoanthus  was based on intraspecific monphyly of C. tsukaharai  specimens within a polytomy of species representing Savalia  (= Gerardia  ) and Parazoanthus  (Figs. 5–7 of Reimer et al. 2008 a), and on the supposition that no described zoanthid genus lacks a skeleton and associates with Alcyonacea  (however, Parazoanthus lucificum Cutress & Pequegnat, 1960  and Epizoanthus induratum Cutress & Pequegnat, 1960  both appear to meet these criteria). A more comprehensive (in terms of taxa and data) molecular phylogeny supports reciprocal monophyly for species related to Corallizoanthus  and Savalia ( Swain 2010)  and may offer justification for the retention of this genus; although no non-molecular characters yet differentiate Corallizoanthus  from Savalia  (which appears to include the scleroprotein skeleton-free P. lucificum: Sinniger et al. 2008  ). Additionally, the marginal musculature of C. tsukaharai  described here (as cyclically transitional) seems to exclude Corallizoanthus  from the current definition of Parazoanthidae  , which is limited to macrocnemic Zoanthidea  with endodermal marginal musculature. Resolving these issues will require reexamination of the Corallizoanthus, Savalia  , Parazoanthus  , and Epizoanthus  taxa that form these clades (see Fig. 1View FIGURE 1 of Swain 2010).

Although more research is required and a complete resolution of all issues plaguing these taxonomic concepts is beyond the scope of this submission, we can make some clarifications and suggestions here. The specimens of Epizoanthus  with phylogenetic affinities to C. tsukaharai  ( Epizoanthus aff. tsukaharai  [CA] and Epizoanthus aff. tsukaharai  [ NZ] sensu Swain 2010) were conservatively assigned to genus Epizoanthus  (because of their largely mesogleal marginal musculature) in the absence of morphological data on Corallizoanthus  (which should have an entirely endodermal marginal musculature if Corallizoanthus  belongs to Parazoanthidae  ). With the data presented here on C. tsukaharai  , and a review of the morphbank images (collections 476540 & 476539) and histological slides of Swain 2010, we interpret the morphology of these specimens (particularly the marginal musculature) to be consistent with (but not identical to) C. tsukaharai  and therefore reassign them to the revised Co rallizoanthus. Whether the definition of Parazoanthidae  should be expanded to include cyclically transitional marginal musculatures or whether Corallizoanthus  (and potentially Savalia  ) should be reassigned to a different family is not yet clear. The marginal musculature of Savalia  is defined as transitional ( Ocaña et al. 1995), an interpretation that would be made by observing almost any single section of a cyclically transitional marginal musculature (see below), and could be one of the characters that unifies Savalia  and Corallizoanthus  (also supported by phylogeny, see Fig. 1View FIGURE 1 of Swain 2010) in a new family or a reinstated Savaliidae Nardo, 1844 (= Gerardiidae Roche  & Tixier- Durivault, 1951). Although Sinniger et al. 2008 suggest (but did not offer documentation) that Parazoanthus lucificum  secretes its own skeleton (an important character for identifying Savalia  ) and reassigned P. lucificum  to Savalia  (as Savalia lucifica  ), the original description ( Cutress & Pequegnat 1960) makes no mention of this character and describes the marginal musculature as endodermal (not transitional as in Savalia  ). The resolution of these apparent discrepancies is also not clear and would require the reexamination of internal microanatomy of the type specimens of Savalia savaglia (Bertoloni, 1819)  and Parazoanthus lucificum  in order to determine if specimens have been misidentified in recent research (e.g., E. induratum  has the superficial appearance of P. lucificum  , but its marginal musculature seems much more similar to Savalia  ) or if taxon definitions must be further revised.