Metadorodocia vittata ( Waterhouse, 1878 )

Akhmetova, Lilia & Montreuil, Olivier, 2010, Revision of Metadorodocia Machatschke, 1957, a genus endemic to Madagascar (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Rutelinae: Adoretini), Zootaxa 2401, pp. 61-68 : 62-64

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.275902

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6197158

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/325687EB-936D-425D-FF60-B2F4FD1DAD17

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Metadorodocia vittata ( Waterhouse, 1878 )
status

 

Metadorodocia vittata ( Waterhouse, 1878)

Figs. 5, 6 View FIGURES 1 – 6 , 8, 10 View FIGURES 7 – 10 , 11, 12 View FIGURES 11 – 14

Adoretus vittatus – Waterhouse 1878: 287.

Adoretus vittatus – Künckel d’Herculais 1887: XVI, 10. Adoretus vittatus – Alluaud 1900: 273.

Adorodocia vittata – Ohaus 1918: 182.

Metadorodocia vittata – Machatschke 1957: 323.

Type material. Lectotype male (here designated) with the label “Madag. 78.18”,” ( BMNH); paralectotype female with the same label as the lectotype ( BMNH).

Additional material. MADAGASCAR: female, “Tananarive, 1889, R.P. Camboué leg.”; 2 males and female, “Antanarivo, Kingdon leg.”; male and female, “Fianarantsoa, Janson leg.”; female, “Fianarantsoa”; 2 males and female, “Antanaporivo”; 3 males and female, “Cowan leg.”; male, “P. Griveaud leg.”; 2 males, “Andriamena, P. Griveaud leg.”; male, “Betsileo, 14–15.II.1974, P. Viette, A. Payrieras leg.”; male, “Ranomafana, XI-2004, O. Montreuil leg” (OM personal collection); male and female, “1881”; 4 males and 2 females, no locality.

Description. Lectotype, male. 17.5 mm, with elongate, rather convex, shiny body. Color dark brown, venter of body almost black, elytra with reddish-yellow pattern.

Head with clypeus rounded, turned up on the margins, relatively short, its length shorter than 1/2 width. Genae very small, almost not protruding past eyes. Clypeus and disc of head smooth, glabrous, punctate near the eyes and on the posterior border of head and clypeus.

Pronotum brown with slightly darker lateral sides, trapezoidal, more than 2 times wider than long, its dorsal surface slightly convex. Anterior angles acute; posterior angles almost right. Dorsal surface finely microreticulated and punctulate, with bunches of rather large, rounded punctures near the base laterally. Each puncture bears very short, thin, pale seta in the center. Lateral margins with small, dense, partly joined punctures. Disc of pronotum glabrous.

Scutellum of the same dark color as elytra, subtriangular, slightly rounded laterally, with sparse punctures; bearing very short, white setae.

Elytra relatively convex, wider than pronotum, brown, with 3 longitudinal, large, yellow maculae on each elytron. Medial macula bordering the sutural margin not interrupted. Two lateral maculae almost fused in some specimens ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 7 – 10 ). Elytra sparsely, irregularly, and finely punctate, with irregular sparse, thin, paler setae of varying length. Epipleurae and apices of elytra with thick, sparse setae.

Legs include protibiae with 3 teeth on the outer margin, the middle tooth closer to the apical one.

Ve nt e r of body, excluding glabrous metasternal disc, with sparse, relatively long, thin, pale setae. Visible apical sternite of abdomen elongate, punctate.

Eight tergite shagreened, covered with sparse, short, thin, pale setae and with long erected setae near the apical margin.

Aedeagus with parameres without processes in dorsolateral view ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 7 – 10 ). Endophallus as in Fig. 12 View FIGURES 11 – 14 .

Variability. The paralectotype differs from the lectotype in the slightly larger body. Some specimens are colored dark brown to black excluding yellow maculae on elytra. Lateral macula may or may not be interrupted. Males of the species can slightly differ in the shape of parameres ( Figs. 5, 6 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ). Female similar to the male, except by the longer, more rounded and completely rugose apical sternite of abdomen ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 11 – 14 ) and stronger protibiae.

Differential diagnosis. Metadorodocia vittata can be separated from M. frolovi by the presence of two to three yellow maculae on each elytron ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 7 – 10 ) and by the parameres without processes in the dorsal side ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 7 – 10 ).

Distribution. Central Madagascar ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 11 – 14 ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Rutelidae

Genus

Metadorodocia

Loc

Metadorodocia vittata ( Waterhouse, 1878 )

Akhmetova, Lilia & Montreuil, Olivier 2010
2010
Loc

Metadorodocia vittata

Machatschke 1957: 323
1957
Loc

Adorodocia vittata

Ohaus 1918: 182
1918
Loc

Adoretus vittatus

Alluaud 1900: 273
1900
Loc

Adoretus vittatus

Waterhouse 1878: 287
1878
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF