Phymanthus crucifer ( Le Sueur, 1817 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.203987 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6180915 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/35648787-DB1E-FFB3-88E5-FA72FAC6FBA3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Phymanthus crucifer ( Le Sueur, 1817 ) |
status |
|
Phymanthus crucifer ( Le Sueur, 1817) View in CoL
( Figure 7 View FIGURE 7 , Table 2 View TABLE 2 )
Actinia crucifera Le Sueur, 1817: 174 –175.
Cereus crucifer Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864: 31 , pl. VI, fig. 13.
Cereus Crucifer View in CoL [sic] Duchassaing, 1870: 20.
Phymanthus cruciferus Andres, 1883: 501 View in CoL .
Ragactis cruciata Andres, 1883: 471 View in CoL .
Phymanthus crucifer McMurrich, 1889a: 51 View in CoL –55.
Epicystis crucifera Verrill, 1898: 496 .
Epicystis osculifera Verrill, 1900: 556 View in CoL .
Phymantes crucifer Cutress & Cutress, 1976: 310 View in CoL .
Phimanthus crucifer Zamponi, 1981: 165 View in CoL .
Epicystis crucifer Cairns View in CoL , den Hartog, & Arneson, 1986: 177, 179, pl. 51.
Material examined.— Puerto Morelos (20°51’48.66” N, 86°51’33.32” W; 7 specimens); GoogleMaps Punta Cancún (21°9’10.5” N, 86°44’41.2” W; 1 specimen). GoogleMaps
Diagnosis.—Fully expanded tentacles and oral disc 40–100 mm in diameter. Oral disc 32–55 mm in diameter, rough, variable in color, often white with dark brown, olive-green with white, or grey with green and brown ( Figure 7 View FIGURE 7 A, B). Marginal and discal tentacles ( Figure 7 View FIGURE 7 A, B). Marginal tentacles short, about 350–360, tapering distally, with annular thickenings ( Figure 7 View FIGURE 7 A) or smooth, olive green or light brown with longitudinal colored stripes ( Figure 7 View FIGURE 7 B). Discal tentacles reduced, small, vesicle-like, arranged in radial rows on oral disc. Column margin with one row of small vesicles without holotrichs ( Figure 7 View FIGURE 7 C). Column cylindrical, smooth, 27–45 mm in diameter and 15–35 mm in height, plate-like, with rough surface, pinkish proximally and fading into whitish distally, with flamelike staining pattern. Column with longitudinal rows of adherent pink verrucae distally, 5–6 verrucae per row ( Figure 7 View FIGURE 7 C, D, F). Pedal disc well developed, 12–35 mm in diameter, bright pink or orange ( Figure 7 View FIGURE 7 D). Mesenteries hexamerously arranged in four cycles (48 pairs in specimens examined): first two cycles and some mesenteries of third cycle perfect and fertile, others imperfect and sterile; gonochoric (?), only oocytes in examined specimens. Two pairs of directives each attached to a well-developed siphonoglyph. Retractor muscles strong, restricted; parietobasilar muscles well developed with long free mesogleal pennon ( Figure 7 View FIGURE 7 E). Basilar muscles well developed. Marginal sphincter muscle absent. Zooxanthellae present. Cnidom: basitrichs, microbasic pmastigophores and spirocysts ( Figure 7 View FIGURE 7 G–M; see Table 2 View TABLE 2 ).
Natural history.— Phymanthus crucifer lives attached strongly to coral rocks and dead coral rubble, between 1–7 m depth, in the lagoon and fore-reef zones; the column is usually burrowed in sandy patches with only the oral disc visible above substratum.
Distribution.— Phymanthus crucifer is found along the Caribbean Sea, from Bermuda to Barbados (see Table 1); however, our specimens represent the first record for the Mexican Caribbean (Puerto Morelos and Punta Cancún reefs).
Remarks.— Phymanthus crucifer is the only species of the twelve valid species of the genus reported in the Caribbean Sea ( Fautin 2011). Carlgren (1949) used the presence or absence of thickenings in the marginal tentacles to differentiate Phymanthus and Heteranthus Klunzinger, 1877 , the genera within Phymanthidae . However, P. crucifer includes morphs with and without thickenings in their marginal tentacles. According to Duerden (1900), all forms are different stages of development of these organisms. Although a detailed morphological study is still needed to determine the value of thickenings in the marginal tentacles as a generic or species level character, preliminary results indicate that there are no differences in other morphological characters or cnidae within Phymanthus crucifer .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Phymanthus crucifer ( Le Sueur, 1817 )
Gonzalez-Muñoz, Ricardo, Simões, Nuno, Sanchez-Rodriguez, Judith, Rodriguez, Estefania & Segura-Puertas, Lourdes 2012 |
Epicystis crucifer
Hartog 1986: 177 |
Phymantes crucifer
Zamponi 1981: 165 |
Cutress 1976: 310 |
Epicystis osculifera
Verrill 1900: 556 |
Phymanthus crucifer
Verrill 1898: 496 |
McMurrich 1889: 51 |
Phymanthus cruciferus
Andres 1883: 501 |
Ragactis cruciata
Andres 1883: 471 |
Cereus crucifer
Duchassaing 1870: 20 |
Duchassaing 1864: 31 |
Actinia crucifera
Le 1817: 174 |