Amaranthus × romanus Iamonico
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.295.1.9 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/38695332-FFE9-FF98-47AF-347097322AD4 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Amaranthus × romanus Iamonico |
status |
|
Amaranthus × romanus Iamonico View in CoL , hybr. nov. ( Amaranthus cruentus L. × Amaranthus retroflexus L.)
Type:— ITALY: Roma, Largo Preneste, 24 August 1964, Cacciato 3 (holotype RO!) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ).
– “ Amaranthu s × galii ” sensu Cacciato (1966: 628).
Diagnosis:— Herbs monoecious, annual (therophyte). Stems erect, green, slightly pubescent, branched. Leaves green, ovate to ovate-lanceolate, rhomboidal, margins entire or undulate, apex acute or obtuse (sometimes slightly emarginate), mucronate, base cuneate, usually glabrous, petioled. Synflorescences terminal, panicle-like. Floral bracts lanceolate, longer than perianth (3 ‒ 4 mm long), acute, slightly awned, with membranous borders narrowing to apex, margins entire, glabrous. Pistillate flowers mostly abortive with 5 obovate-spathulate tepals 2.5 ‒ 3.5 mm long. Fruit ellipsoidals, dehiscent. Seeds lenticular, dark-brown or reddish-brown.
Etymology:— The specific epithet is dedicated to the city of Rome, which is the locus classicus of this nothotaxon.
Morphological comparison with parental taxa:— Amaranthus × romanus differs from A. cruentus in having its stem more pubescent, the synflorescence with more densely arranged paraclades, and longer floral bracts. In comparison to A. retroflexus , A. × romanus has intensely green and less pubescent stems (never tomentose), and synflorescences with paraclades and main florescences that are longer and narrower.
Alien status:— Hybrid probably arisen in Europe ( Italy?).
Occurrence in Europe:— On the basis of the current knowledge, Amaranthus ×romanus is known in Europe with certainty only from Central Italy (Lazio region; see Iamonico 2015). The name “ Amaranthus × galii ” is also listed in the floras of three other European countries: Spain (Sennen 1929), France ( Tela Botanica 2000), and Hungary ( DAISIE 2008). However, further investigations (i.e. examination of herbarium specimens and analyses of local literature) are needed to verify the occurrence of A. ×romanus against A. ×ozanonii in France and Hungary.
Additional specimens seen:— ITALY. Lazio: Roma, Largo Preneste , 25 August 1957, Cacciato 3 ( RO!) ; Roma, lungo la via Frascati , 12 August 1964, Cacciato s.n. ( RO!) ; Roma, macerie sul ponte la stazione ferr. Prenestina , 20 August 1964, Cacciato s.n. ( RO!) ; Roma, a via Frascati , 19 September 1964, Cacciato s.n. ( RO!) ; Roma, lungo la via Demetriade nei pressi del Quadraro , strada assai polverosa, 2 October 1964, Cacciato s.n. ( RO!) ; Roma, aiola incota in Piazza dei dicembrini nei pressi
1 According to Stafleu & Cowan (1976: 76), the pages 1 ‒ 80 of the volume 5(2) of Synopsis der Mitteleuropaischen Flora was published on 30 July 1920. di Cinecittà, 08 October 1964, Cacciato s.n. ( RO!) ; Roma, su marciapiede sterrato i Via Curzio Rufo a Cinecitta, 10 October 1964, Cacciato s.n. ( RO!) ; Roma, Cinecitta, 14 August 1965, Cacciato s.n. ( RO!) ; Roma, 28 August 1965, Cacciato s.n. ( RO!) ; Roma, 20 September 1966, Cacciato s.n. ( RO!) ; Roma, prati a Centocelle, 10 September 1989, Cacciato s.n. ( RO!) .
RO |
Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.