Bembidion (Peryphus) obscurellum Motschulsky, 1845
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.62593 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:71DCAFC2-B2BB-475B-9166-2BCDC83C7F07 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/389DE621-EB16-5A8A-AAAB-A928EACB2C33 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Bembidion (Peryphus) obscurellum Motschulsky, 1845 |
status |
|
Bembidion (Peryphus) obscurellum Motschulsky, 1845 View in CoL
Bembidion (Peryphus) obscurellum turanicum Csiki, 1928
Bembidion (Peryphus) obscurellum fumipenne Fassati, 1957
Bembidion (Peryphus) obscurellum thibeticum Fassati, 1957
Bembidion (Peryphus) obscurellum insperatum Lutshnik, 1938
Notes.
Fassati (1957) describes Bembidion (Peryphus) fuscicrum thibeticum ssp. nov. and Bembidion (Peryphus) fuscicrum fumipenne nat. nov.; they are distinguished from the nominotypical form only by the coloration of the elytra. Lindroth (1963) synonymizes the following taxa with B. obscurellum Motschulsky, 1845: B. fuscicrum Motschulsky, 1855, B. fuscicrum turanicum Csiki, 1928, B. fumipenne and B. thibeticum , the last two taxa because they are only color varieties. Kryzhanovskij et al. (1995) listed B. turanicum as a subspecies of B. obscurellum and retained B. fumipenne and B. thibeticum as varieties only; moreover Belousov’s note (Kryzhanovskij et al. 1995: 85, note no. 158) reports that the subspecific situation of this polymorphic species is provisional. Recently, some authors (e.g., Lorenz 2005; Marggi et al. 2017) still list B. turanicum , B. fumipenne , and B. thibeticum as subspecies of B. obscurellum .
In light of our studies we maintain that the synonymies proposed by Lindroth (1963) were correct; moreover, our colleague Liang Hongbin (IZCAS, Beijing) confirms our opinion based on the study of hundreds of specimens from Mongolia that clearly show the variability of the species (Liang Hongbin, pers. comm.).
Regarding Bembidion (Peryphus) obscurellum insperatum Lutshnik, 1938, since its discriminating characters are not exclusive but shared by other subspecies, we evaluated the synonymy expressed in Marggi et al. (2017) and add to the distribution of the species the Russian Caucasus (ST), the region mentioned in the description, as already reported in Kryzhanovskij et al. (1995): Ciscaucasia, Western and Central Greater Caucasus. Current distribution: E: DE, NT, ST, SV; A: AF, CH, ES, IN, KA, KI, KZ, MG, TM, TR, WS, XIZ; NAR.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Bembidion (Peryphus) obscurellum Motschulsky, 1845
Neri, Paolo & Toledano, Luca 2021 |
Bembidion (Peryphus) obscurellum fumipenne
Fassati 1957 |
Bembidion (Peryphus) obscurellum thibeticum
Fassati 1957 |
Bembidion (Peryphus) obscurellum insperatum
Lutshnik 1938 |
Bembidion (Peryphus) obscurellum turanicum
Csiki 1928 |