Rhopalophthalmus longipes Ii, 1964

Tan, Hai Siang & Azman, B. A. R., 2017, First record of Rhopalophthalmuslongipes Ii, 1964 from Malaysian waters (Crustacea, Mysida), ZooKeys 642, pp. 53-61: 55-58

publication ID


publication LSID


persistent identifier


treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Rhopalophthalmus longipes Ii, 1964


Rhopalophthalmus longipes Ii, 1964  Figs 2, 3, 4, 5

Rhopalophthalmus longipes  Ii, 1964, 180, figs 46, 47; Mauchline and Murano 1977, 75 [catalogue]; Muller 1993, 49 [catalogue]; Wang and Liu 1994, 91, figs 14; 1997, 204; 2000, 114, figs 27; Hanamura et al. 2011, 14, figs 8-10.

Material examined.

One immature female, 6.5 mm, UKMMZ-1553, Kampung Sebirah Kechil, Pulau Tinggi, Sultan Iskandar Marine Park, Johor, 02°18.581'N, 104°05.624'E, epibenthic sledge, 25th March 2012, 30.1 °C, depth 7 m, coll. Azman, B.A.R., Tan, H.S. and Shamsul, B.; eight immature females, six juveniles, UKMMZ-1554; three juveniles, UKMMZ-1555; two immature females, four juveniles, UKMMZ-1556; same station. Largest immature female, 6.9 mm, juveniles, 1.9-3.5 mm, males not collected. In the females, smaller than 5.9 mm, the pleopods are not fully developed. Juveniles: in the smallest specimens at our disposal, measuring 1.9 mm, the eyes are somewhat larger and with stouter stalk than in the adult.


Based on immature female, 6.5 mm, UKMMZ-1553, Figs 2A, 5A.

Carapace short; anterior dorsal part of carapace between postorbital spines slightly produced, forming evenly rounded rostral plate; the postorbital spines sharp, supported by very short, feebly developed carina; antero-lateral angles of the carapace ( “cheeks”) somewhat sinuous or slightly concave; posterior dorsal margin excavate, leaving the last two to three posterior thoracic somites exposed completely in dorsal view; cervical sulcus well marked dorsally and laterally around anterior one-third, nodules not present on the dorsal surface of carapace, just posterior to cervical groove in addition to posterior one.

Eyes large and globular, somewhat shorter than the first joint of antennular peduncle; cornea well pigmented; the whole eye, including the stalk, nearly 1 ½ times as long as broad, stalk nearly cylindrical, cornea occupying ⅓ of the eye and somewhat narrower than the distal end of the stalk (Fig. 3A).

Antennular peduncle somewhat slender, first segment of antennular peduncle 1 ⅓ times as long as the combined length of distal two segments, armed with several setae along lateral margin; second segment shortest, slightly shorter than wide; third segment longer than wide, with three moderate setae, distal outer corner produced into a triangular process under the base of the outer flagellum and a rounded process bearing two protrusions (Fig. 3B) apically near the middle distal end (Fig. 3C).

Antennal scale extending beyond the distal end of the antennular peduncle, approx. 6⅓-7 times as long as wide, the margins nearly parallel and equal width throughout; apex almost truncate; a distinct oblique suture marking off the small distal segment; disto-lateral spine slender, prominent and extending beyond the apex of the scale; sympod composed of four spines on the inner ventral face at the base of peduncle (Fig. 3E), two longer and two short spines, the most inner lateral spine around five times longer than the mesial one (Fig. 3D).

Labrum transverse, without process in front, mandibles with moveable lacinia thick, molar process thick, slightly produced, with teeth on the end, the palp moderately short, very feebly expanded. Maxilla (Fig. 3F) with the lobe from third segment deeply cleft, the palp elongated, the exopod rather small.

Abdominal somites smooth, second to fifth somites nearly sub-equal in length, first and sixth somites 1 ½ times as long as fifth one (Fig. 5A).

Endopods of pereopods (Figs 4A, B, C, D, E, F, 5B) slender and gradually increase in length posteriorly, remarkable in having proportionately long endopod particularly in seventh one; endopod of third to sixth pereopods similar in shape but length increasing posteriorly; endopod of third pereopod (Fig. 4C) slightly stouter than the fourth one, carpo-propodus divided into three articles, basal article sub-equal or slightly longer than the carpo-propodus; endopod of fourth to sixth pereopods (Figs 4D, 4E, 4F) having three-segmented carpo-propodus; endopod of seventh pereopod (Fig. 5B) longest, approx. 2½ times as long as the exopod, carpo-propodus divided into four articles, carpus noticeably long, as long as or longer than pereopod normally un-articulated, barely reaching mid-length of basal plate of exopod.

Pleopods un-articulated, length generally increasing on posterior somites but that on third pleopod somewhat short, comparable to first one (Figs 5C, 5D, 5E).

Uropod two-segmented in both endopod and exopod; endopod sub-equal in length with telson, proximal segment with a strong stout seta at the middle of the ventral inner margin, distal segment ¼ of the endopod in length; exopod with outer margin very fine setose, somewhat longer than endopod with distal segment ⅖ of the exopod in length and 10½ times as long as wide (Fig. 5F).

Telson comparatively narrow and slender, 4 ⅖ times as long as basal wide, nearly same length as the sixth abdominal somite, extends distinctly beyond the articulations of the uropod, abruptly constricted beyond the articulations of the uropod but not forming discernible waist, and hardly broadens to first ½ point with the lateral margins nearly parallel, in the next half gradually narrows distally with convex margins somewhat concave, and accordingly rather slightly broadens distally near the apex; distal half of the lateral margin armed with 7-9 strong spines, increasing in length posteriorly in the distal part but become again somewhat shorter towards the apex; apex narrowly rounded and armed with four extremely strong spines; the apical spines nearly equal in length with each other, ⅕ of the total length of the telson and furnished with secondary spinules, which are flattened like saw-teeth (Fig. 5G).

Type locality.

Shizuoka, Japan


Shizuoka, Nagasaki, Japan (Ii, 1964); Nansha Islands, the Spratlys (Wang and Liu, 1994); East China Sea (Wang and Liu, 1997); off Amami Island, south-western Japan; south-western part of South China Sea and western part of Timor Sea ( Hanamura et al., 2011) and Pulau Tinggi, Johor, Malaysia (present study).


Rhopalophthalmus longipes  was first described by Ii (1964) based on the specimens collected from Japan. This species can be easily distinguished from others species in having a very narrow telson and secondary spinules on the apical spines of telson. Another distinct character within the genus is the endopod of third to seventh thoracopods gradually increasing in length posteriorly and the seventh endopod of thoracopod being more than twice as long as the exopod.

Rhopalophthalmus longipes  resembles Rhopalophthalmus orientalis  , which was described by Tattersall (1957) from Japanese waters by having two long spines and two shorter spines at the antennal sympod and possessed peculiarly flattened teeth-saw like secondary spinules on the apical spines of telson. However, the seventh endopod of thoracopod in latter species is not as long as twice the length of exopod compared to Rhopalophthalmus longipes  and the telson is conspicuously slender in the distal half compared to Rhopalophthalmus orientalis  , which is moderately broad in distal half. In addition, Rhopalophthalmus orientalis  has small triangular rostrum, which is not found in the Rhopalophthalmus longipes  . Rhopalophthalmus longipes  also shows resemblance to Rhopalophthalmus terranatalis  O. Tattersall, 1957 collected from estuarine waters around the coasts of Natal from Richard’s Bay (on the east to Langebaan Bay of the south-west coast), but seventh thoracic endopod of the latter species has seven sub-segments instead of four sub-segments with an unusually elongated carpus in Rhopalophthalmus longipes  .

The specimens found in this study exhibit some slight differences from the Rhopalophthalmus longipes  of Hanamura et al. (2011) as the small nodules near the cervical sulcus of the carapace were absent. The specimens at hand also differ from the speci mens described by Ii (1964) and Hanamura et al. (2011) by the combination of these characters; 1) presence of a triangular process under the base of the outer flagellum; 2) presence of a rounded process bearing two protrusions apically near the middle distal end of third segment of antennule peduncle; and 3) telson armed with only 7-8 moderately strong setae.