Creopelates lubangensis, Uyeno, Daisuke, 2015

Uyeno, Daisuke, 2015, Systematic revision of the pennellid genus Creopelates Shiino, 1958 (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida) and the proposal of a new genus, Zootaxa 3904 (3), pp. 359-386 : 368-374

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3904.3.3

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:637EF6A8-E69B-412F-8405-C229581FB8EB

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6098537

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3F30807F-FFD5-FFE7-A3D9-F882B678FA65

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Creopelates lubangensis
status

sp. nov.

Creopelates lubangensis n. sp.

( Figs 6 View FIGURE 6 C, D, 9, 10)

Type material. Holotype: postmetamorphic adult female ( NMCR 39115) (dissected), ex Gobiodon rivulatus (Rüppell) ( Perciformes : Gobiidae ), off Pangpang (13°48'N, 120°5'E), Lubang Island, Mindro, South China Sea, Philippines, 5 m depth, 23 May, 2014, leg. A. Ackiss, M. Lane, and D. Uyeno. Paratype: 1 postmetamorphic adult female (UF 40383), collection data same as those of holotype.

Description of postmetamorphic adult female. Body ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 A) 5.24 long, comprising cephalothorax, neck region and trunk; junction of neck and trunk curved. Cephalothorax ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 A–C) ovoid, 0.35 × 0.37, bearing paired rounded antennary process with inner spherical projection and posterolateral lobes both with digitate fringes; ventral surface with irregularly situated small conical protrusions; rostrum ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 D) protruding. Neck region ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 A) narrow, with paired lateral digitate lobes, constriction in anterior ⅓, with multiple posterior protrusions, fringed with series of about ten pairs of finely digitate lobes ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 A); second and third pedigers indistinctly segmented ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 B, C). Trunk ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 A, E) bean-shaped, longer than wide 2.13 × 1.42, with anterior end narrowing slightly towards neck region. Abdomen conical, bearing median depression, located between oviducal pores ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 A, E). Egg-sac uniseriate, coiled ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 A).

Antennule ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 F) unsegmented, bearing 19 setae on anterior margin: distal tip with 10 setae distally, 2 of which share common base, and 1 aesthetasc. Antenna ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 A) 3-segmented, chelate, typical pennellid; proximal segment bearing; middle segment bearing one pointed protrusion on inner medial margin; terminal segment clawlike bearing small basal element on posterior surface. Mouth tube, maxillule, and maxilla located near base of antenna on anterior part of ventral surface of cephalothorax. Maxillule ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 B) comprising one blunt, flanged seta and lobe with two distal setae. Maxilla ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 C) 2-segmented; proximal segment bearing single subterminal pointed process; terminal segment elongate, incompletely subdivided, with distal part ornamented with rows of small spinules. Maxilliped absent.

Legs 1 and 2 ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 D, E) biramous. Legs 3 and 4 ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 F, G) uniramous. Legs 1–4 evenly arrayed along posterior part of cephalothorax to neck region ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 C). Armature formula of legs 1–4 as follows:

Protopod Exopod Endopod Leg 1 1–1 1–1; 7 0–1; 7 Leg 2 1–0 1–1; 7 0–1; 7 Leg 3 1–0 0–0; 6 Absent Leg 4 1–0 0–0; 5 Absent Protopods of legs 1–4 connected to respective intercoxal sclerites ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 D–G).

Attachment site. The cephalothorax and neck of the copepod were embedded in the musculature of the host’s trunk behind the base of the pectoral fin and attached to the vertebrae, while its trunk and egg sacs remained external to the fish’s body wall ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 C, D).

Variability of female morphology. The morphology of the female paratype is as in the holotype. The measurements of the paratype are as follows (n = 1): body length 4.57; cephalothorax length 0.38; cephalothorax width 0.35; trunk length 1.96; trunk width 1.30.

Remarks. Creopelates lubangensis n. sp. differs from C. floridus , C. hoshinoi n. sp. and C. shirakawai n. sp. in having antennary processes with digitate fringes (vs. without digitate fringes). The copepod is distinguishable from C. nohmijimensis by the following character states: antennary processes with inner spherical process (vs. without such a process); the cepholothorax and neck region bearing several small conical processes (vs. without such processes); the neck region bearing multiple protrusions posteriorly (vs. without such protrusions).

Etymology. The specific name “ lubangensis ” refers to the locality where it was found, Lubang Island.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF